The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 June 2013, 03:23 AM   #181
EchoBlueUK
"TRF" Member
 
EchoBlueUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
40mm = perfect
EchoBlueUK is offline  
Old 16 June 2013, 04:32 AM   #182
ericg
"TRF" Member
 
ericg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Thailand
Watch: BLNR/SubC/SMP 300
Posts: 306
Perfect for me as well. I've got a 6 3/4 inch wrist and its just the right size
ericg is offline  
Old 16 June 2013, 04:33 AM   #183
Billywiz
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
NO...style never goes out of style...fashion comes and goes.
Billywiz is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 07:56 AM   #184
rmurphy
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
My 40 mm Sub is perfection
Attached Images
 
rmurphy is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 07:59 AM   #185
A.Sharp
"TRF" Member
 
A.Sharp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,062
no way
__________________
A.Sharp

"I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."
A.Sharp is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 08:13 AM   #186
accurate
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 31
I think it's just about perfect!
accurate is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 08:58 AM   #187
mruhland31
"TRF" Member
 
mruhland31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 1,028
40mm Sub is perfect for me. Does not need to be bigger...imho
mruhland31 is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:04 AM   #188
Macnavara
"TRF" Member
 
Macnavara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,355
Way to small
Macnavara is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:12 AM   #189
Grey.Coupe
"TRF" Member
 
Grey.Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
just right
Grey.Coupe is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:34 AM   #190
kuya808
"TRF" Member
 
kuya808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NW
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 117
40mm is the perfect size.
__________________
Rolex Daytona 116520 ('12)
Tudor BigBlock 94300 ('78)



See the future but live for the moment...
kuya808 is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:39 AM   #191
alexsd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: san diego
Watch: Datejust II 2012
Posts: 16
I think they need to go with a beefier model. I love the Panerai Luminor 48mm! THat will be my next purchase someday.... 40mm and under seem to Dainty for a real man..HA
alexsd is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:40 AM   #192
anothernewphone
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexsd View Post
I think they need to go with a beefier model. I love the Panerai Lumino 48mm! THat will be my next purchase someday.... 40mm and under seem to Dainty for a real man..HA
A beefier model? Because Rolex is struggling to sell 40mm watches...
anothernewphone is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:43 AM   #193
submariner123
"TRF" Member
 
submariner123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
NO! it is perfect
submariner123 is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:49 AM   #194
Swift_Movement
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Watch: The Throne
Posts: 375
The ceramic has added glitz and glam that larger pieces seek - without increasing the size. I think the 40mm is still perfect.
Swift_Movement is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 09:55 AM   #195
samsam
"TRF" Member
 
samsam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
I personally would like a 42mm Sub. I dont think 42-45mm is a trend anymore. Its a reality(at least with diving watches).
X2

It is the thickness that I don't like with bigger watches. If they fit under my shirt's long sleeves, they are fine with me.
samsam is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 10:05 AM   #196
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
For me, my 40mm Sub is perfect. I am so over this maxi watch case thing. They are fine for many people, and the watch makers ought to have models that appeal to such buyers. But there is nothing to suggest that a model with a +50 year track record of success should be changed based on current trends, sort of like changing the formula for Coke.
Next we'll be debating whether Rolex should make a Datejust 1.5
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 10:29 AM   #197
c.rod
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
yes. to small. i do not like wearing a watch that WOMEN wear on a regular basis.
not just rolex, but small watches in general.
c.rod is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 10:55 AM   #198
Lexxxus
"TRF" Member
 
Lexxxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Winnipeg CANADA
Posts: 57
I have a 7" wrist and have worn the sub for nearly 30 years and have seen it go from "Wow! That watch is huge!" to have people call it smallish.

I recently bought a Panerai 299 and while doing my research I thought it might be too large. It looks just fine on my smaller wrist but could not go any larger. Both my subs are the older style and feel like an old friend. While it is not as large as some of the obscenely large watches out there I think it is the perfect size. Though big guys with huge wrists may tend to find it almost lady-like when you compare it to the 47mm and larger Omegas and bigger stuff like the U-Boat and other alarm clocks for the wrist.

That said I tried on an Oris Divers / Small seconds the other day and it looked just fine despite being 47mm. It's the tapered case that makes it look OK even on my wrist.



Wayne
Lexxxus is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 11:18 AM   #199
Eric5964
"TRF" Member
 
Eric5964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Brtlg
Posts: 461
I think they could do different size subs like they do with Datejusts and Yachtmasters....I think a 45 mm and a 40 mm would make everyone happy

EricE
__________________
EricE

Watch addict
Michigan
Eric5964 is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 11:25 AM   #200
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by c.rod View Post
i do not like wearing a watch that WOMEN wear on a regular basis.
not just rolex, but small watches in general.
Odd that you let current women's fashion influence your watch purchasing decisions. I suppose if women everywhere started wearing Fifty Fathoms then you'd have to avoid those too.
powerfunk is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 11:31 AM   #201
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
I wouldn't let a random shot of a C list celebrity at a Miami Heat game serve as a barometer for what is fashionable wristwear for the ladies. Most women wearing the large watches are wearing Michael Korrs fashion pieces, not necessarily high end time pieces.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 12:15 PM   #202
Billywiz
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
No...can't second guess a design that has stood the test of time to the point of becoming iconic.
Elegance and style last forever... fashion comes and goes...like wrist clocks.
Billywiz is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 12:57 PM   #203
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream99 View Post
I read lots about guys saying 40mm watches being to small for them. Do you think this is the case and will Rolex eventually realise perhaps a 42-44mm Sub would be a better watch for most or would it compete with the DSSD to much for their long term stratergy ?


Too small. Too shiny.
WJGESQ is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 01:03 PM   #204
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
The 16610 is too small on my frame in my opinion, but the 116610 looks great.
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 01:07 PM   #205
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
no it's fine the way it is and has always been, most love it as it is imho
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 01:11 PM   #206
AmbSteve
"TRF" Member
 
AmbSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
40 mm isn't small regardless of wrist size...perfect fit. And, the Sub wears larger than it is.
__________________
AmbSteve is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 01:26 PM   #207
c.rod
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
i guess my opinion is jaded because i have big flat wrists.... i guess 40mm is probably perfect for most of the normal sized folks..
c.rod is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 01:41 PM   #208
Galion
"TRF" Member
 
Galion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PE - BR
Posts: 558
Very subjective question, It all depends on your body build and wrist size.
Its like asking if a size 32 pant is too small and others complaining a 36 is too big.
I never get this too big/small threads, useless imo.
__________________
126600 126603 116900 116610LV 116610LN 226570 AP15703 PAM029 HBB44
Galion is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 02:51 PM   #209
DreambreaX
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
before its big. now its small
DreambreaX is offline  
Old 24 June 2013, 03:15 PM   #210
PunkJr
"TRF" Member
 
PunkJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Adelaide
Watch: 14060 Sub
Posts: 332
Here's a pic of my Sub on my 8.75" wrist. I've never thought it was too small, but after a wearing a Speedy for a week or so, it does take a little to adjust to. I can get away with wearing a larger watch, but a 44mm on a 7" wrist
Attached Images
 
PunkJr is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.