The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 November 2017, 05:18 AM   #1
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Why isn't the GMT also known as "The Moon watch"

In 1971 the entire NASA team wore Pepsi GMT's on their mission to the moon.
This seems to be an important moment in Rolex history, doesn't seem to get mentioned much.

http://www.rolexmagazine.com/2008/06...story.html?m=1
Watchgeek5000 is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:23 AM   #2
Leejjay
"TRF" Member
 
Leejjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 34
Possibly because the name The Moon Watch is used by Omega as they were there 1st. 1969 if I’m correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leejjay is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:27 AM   #3
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leejjay View Post
Possibly because the name The Moon Watch is used by Omega as they were there 1st. 1969 if I’m correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, understood. But the fact that three astronauts wore a Rolex GMT on a moon mission is pretty cool and worth recognition. Not that Rolex really needs more recognition, but as an owner of these watches it adds to its history.
Watchgeek5000 is offline  
Old 15 November 2017, 02:56 AM   #4
hulkalicious
"TRF" Member
 
hulkalicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: UK
Watch: Submariner LVC
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leejjay View Post
Possibly because the name The Moon Watch is used by Omega as they were there 1st. 1969 if I’m correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Correct. However Omega decided to ruin that by creating a new moonwatch for every bl**dy launch since which kinda spoils it imo. You can choose the buy the original Heslite moonwatch which is like a plastic screen they actually used or the same but with standard Crystal. The Heslite version is extremely light so much so it didn't work for me.
hulkalicious is offline  
Old 16 November 2017, 01:25 AM   #5
chrito
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leejjay View Post
Possibly because the name The Moon Watch is used by Omega as they were there 1st. 1969 if I’m correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes you are
chrito is offline  
Old 16 November 2017, 05:25 AM   #6
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leejjay View Post
Possibly because the name The Moon Watch is used by Omega as they were there 1st. 1969 if I’m correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To be specific it was 7/20/69. I remember it well because it was my mother's birthday. We talked on the phone as I was up in Maine at camp. Everyone was tuned in to the unfolding events.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:26 AM   #7
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Humm let me guess
FTX I is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:30 AM   #8
omx5o
"TRF" Member
 
omx5o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Tudor Ranger
Posts: 1,613
No prizes for coming second.
omx5o is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:35 AM   #9
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
Can't always be first! But cool information anyway, personally I didn't know about this story.
Watchgeek5000 is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:41 AM   #10
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
Especially after failing NASA's test
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 01:00 AM   #11
faaaaaaaasterrrrr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Another One?
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Especially after failing NASA's test
This. It’s not like Omega won a raffle.
faaaaaaaasterrrrr is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 06:38 AM   #12
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Especially after failing NASA's test
to be fair the gmt master didn’t fail the test. the daytona did and iirc it was due to the use of a gold second hand warping.

no rolex afaik failed on the moon/space though unlike 2 known omega failures.

and to be honest going to the moon, the watched were an after thought according to many interviews.
breitlings is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 07:33 AM   #13
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
to be fair the gmt master didn’t fail the test. the daytona did and iirc it was due to the use of a gold second hand warping.

no rolex afaik failed on the moon/space though unlike 2 known omega failures.

and to be honest going to the moon, the watched were an after thought according to many interviews.
Good points, but here's another one:

The GMT wasn't tested and the Daytona wasn't designed for anyone other than a weekend racing enthusiast so it stands to reason that if Rolex were given a spec and a year to build a watch to meet that spec, they could easily have been the designated official NASA watch.

Omega won the bake-off via good luck, that's all. Their racing watch passed a heat test that the Rolex racing watch failed, neither was a moon travelers watch as there was no such thing in 1963 or 1957 when the Daytona and Speedmaster were designed.

A chronograph was needed in the early years of the space program because of burns and navigation requiring precise timing. By the time we get to 1972 and the end of the space program the computers were powerful enough and redundant enough to make a chronograph unnecessary, thus the reason so many astronauts switched to GMT's with NASA's blessing.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 11:37 AM   #14
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLMARINER View Post
Good points, but here's another one:

The GMT wasn't tested and the Daytona wasn't designed for anyone other than a weekend racing enthusiast so it stands to reason that if Rolex were given a spec and a year to build a watch to meet that spec, they could easily have been the designated official NASA watch.

Omega won the bake-off via good luck, that's all. Their racing watch passed a heat test that the Rolex racing watch failed, neither was a moon travelers watch as there was no such thing in 1963 or 1957 when the Daytona and Speedmaster were designed.

A chronograph was needed in the early years of the space program because of burns and navigation requiring precise timing. By the time we get to 1972 and the end of the space program the computers were powerful enough and redundant enough to make a chronograph unnecessary, thus the reason so many astronauts switched to GMT's with NASA's blessing.
Someone is just peanut butter and jealous a true test is not knowing your product is going to be tested, fact Omega passed and the rest FAILED. it’s only luck when it doesn’t go there way right I know this is a Rolex forum but wow, always a good laugh!
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 12:14 PM   #15
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLMARINER View Post
Omega won the bake-off via good luck, that's all.
Ah yes. It couldn’t possibly be because omega made a better product...
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 07:35 AM   #16
dubins930
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
to be fair the gmt master didn’t fail the test. the daytona did and iirc it was due to the use of a gold second hand warping.
Yes, every single watchever made that was not part of NASA testing didn’t fail the test. No one is going to include the Rolex GMT in the “moonwatch catagory”, unless people want to sit at home trying to make themselves feel good.

My G-shock DW5600 is more qualified for being called a moonwatch according to NASA
dubins930 is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 01:35 PM   #17
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Especially after failing NASA's test
Bingo; only one watch passed NASA's testing and it bears the title. Omega even created a watch especially for it in the Alaska project but NASA wouldn't spend for retesting, The Mark II was what came out of that effort but was never certified. Rolex never made the cut. From my understanding watches weren't requested by NASA; they were bought at stores and just tested.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline  
Old 16 November 2017, 06:36 AM   #18
chrito
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
lol
chrito is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 01:24 AM   #19
DonBateman
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
Bingo
DonBateman is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 04:33 AM   #20
jlovda
"TRF" Member
 
jlovda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
This

"This was Apollo 17's Ron Evans personal Rolex GMT flown to the moon and auctioned off in 2009."

Even Apollo astronauts flip their watches rather than handing them down as heirlooms.
jlovda is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 05:47 AM   #21
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlovda View Post
This

"This was Apollo 17's Ron Evans personal Rolex GMT flown to the moon and auctioned off in 2009."

Even Apollo astronauts flip their watches rather than handing them down as heirlooms.
Mr. Evans passed away in 1990.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 06:24 AM   #22
Yoda_Eating_Pizza
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Yoda_Eating_Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: RJ
Location: Hawaii
Watch: 252
Posts: 1,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlovda View Post
"This was Apollo 17's Ron Evans personal Rolex GMT flown to the moon and auctioned off in 2009."

Even Apollo astronauts flip their watches rather than handing them down as heirlooms.
I wonder if the AD held on to the warranty card.
Yoda_Eating_Pizza is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 11:55 AM   #23
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
And yet, even some watch enthusiasts have no idea what a fifty fathoms is, but my grandmother can spot a sub.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline  
Old 6 December 2018, 11:03 AM   #24
blackhawks-fan
"TRF" Member
 
blackhawks-fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: Black Dial 216570
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
No prizes for coming second.
That's right. Second place is the first loser.
blackhawks-fan is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:38 AM   #25
traf
"TRF" Member
 
traf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
They could pull an omega and engrave the caseback “second watch worn on the moon”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
traf is offline  
Old 5 December 2018, 04:02 AM   #26
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by traf View Post
They could pull an omega and engrave the caseback “second watch worn on the moon”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:46 AM   #27
rolex75216
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
<-- because of this.
__________________
126300, 126610LN
rolex75216 is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:53 AM   #28
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Tough crowd!
Attached Images
 
Watchgeek5000 is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 05:56 AM   #29
rolex75216
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchgeek5000 View Post
Tough crowd!
Just having fun of coarse! I actually did not know about the travel to the moon and what they wore on their remarkable journey. Definitely cool! Not sure why "The Moon Watch" did not catch on?
__________________
126300, 126610LN
rolex75216 is offline  
Old 13 November 2017, 06:00 AM   #30
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolex75216 View Post
Just having fun of coarse! I actually did not know about the travel to the moon and what they wore on their remarkable journey. Definitely cool! Not sure why "The Moon Watch" did not catch on?
Cool story, again it's pretty interesting.
Watchgeek5000 is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.