ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 December 2009, 01:37 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
I think I found a fake Sub
http://cgi.ebay.it/SUBMARINER-NO-DAT...item4cecba9358
The crown caught my eye, I read (on the Rolex Report) the crown has three dots on the Subs. What do you think? |
24 December 2009, 02:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,471
|
If it is a fake, they got the perl perfect.
|
24 December 2009, 04:11 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
The pearl does not look good to me. the level of the pearl is somewhat low. I have my SD and Sub with me now and both pearls filled the space more than pictured.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
24 December 2009, 04:46 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
I don't know, but it looks good to me.
|
24 December 2009, 04:55 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Rolex Crown
Ok what is up with the Crown? I thought all Crowns had markings? Someone educate me please.
|
24 December 2009, 05:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: America
Watch: 16610
Posts: 100
|
the dial is good, the case looks good from what I can see in the limiting pics. The crown IS odd, missing the triplock dots and the teeth are too soft, also the bottom of the coronet on the crown is shaped incorrectly, too 'D' like. Bezel insert print is too thick looking, and the pearl could be an aftermarket sapphire one, as good aftermarket pearls DO exist, not just gloopy luminous paste. The bracelet has rough fitting end links, could be aftermarket as well. I believe this is a refurb with lots of NON genuine parts, even the base of the hands look like they were unprofessionally removed and re-installed. The pics are not the greatest so it IS hard to tell. I think the case, bezel ring, and dial are genuine, hands could be as well. Need MORE pics
Here's to hoping it doesnt contain an ETA 2824 |
24 December 2009, 05:29 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Quote:
|
|
24 December 2009, 05:39 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Look closely at the crown..It has the ... under the crown. The shine obscures it a little.
|
24 December 2009, 06:14 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
|
it could be a aftermarket bezel...
|
24 December 2009, 06:18 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Victor
I have come to the conclusion this Sub is a authentic case with lots of aftermarket parts which I would call it a POS. This is a really good training thread to have so many people identify problems with this watch is good for us that are still learning. |
24 December 2009, 06:23 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
|
Quote:
but it could have a authentic movement! if it does! its a good timepiece, just need to get authentic parts.. |
|
24 December 2009, 07:14 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
How did you come to that determination? IMO, the watch looks fine, the lighting is crappy, shinny pics make it difficult to see certain areas. Please point out the specific problems with the watch. Saying it's fake is easy but please tell us why. |
|
24 December 2009, 07:16 AM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Never-mind, I just saw Steve's post...But to me I can't see it. It still looks good. I guess I have much to learn. |
|
24 December 2009, 07:52 AM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Quote:
Regards David |
|
24 December 2009, 09:47 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
The dots are there. It's a crappy picture and confusing reflections, but if you look closely, the dots are there.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki" 19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 |
24 December 2009, 03:11 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
The watch is genuine and the dots are there on the winding crown indicating it is a triplock. Look at the pictures again, the three dots are there. I see nothing indicating a fake by the pics. The pearl is perfect, dial, bezel and winding crown are all good.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
24 December 2009, 03:39 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
I can see the dots and I have compared it to my 14060M.
I can't say I see any problems with that one but the pix are not good at all and with zero feedback I would want to hold that one in my hand prior to purchase.
__________________
E |
24 December 2009, 03:42 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
See that now that is why I asked questions. The only way to learn is to ask questions for the future. Thanks everyone.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.