ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 March 2010, 07:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
Don't be fooled by this 5513
The sell is claiming originality here "In order to let the buyer/collector make their own judgment we have not altered the watch from its original condition and have not enhanced its appearance."
This 5513 is NOT in original condition with this dial. The correct dial with a 1111xxx serial number would be a gilt dial and showing meters first NOT feet first. IMO the seller is misrepresenting this watch. watchco-australia-numismatics2 ( 2843) Notes: Crystal exhibits a minor scratches; dial in great condition; watch may be in need of a service. In order to let the buyer/collector make their own judgment we have not altered the watch from its original condition and have not enhanced its appearance. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Rolex-Submari...item27b0476fed |
19 March 2010, 09:17 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
Now that is what you call a faded insert!
|
19 March 2010, 10:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Great observation as usual Michael, now we might need LC to contact this seller to see if he can change the listing :-)
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.