The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 April 2010, 01:09 PM   #1
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Day/Date Value Retention Observation

Forgive my ignorance, but wanted to get your comments on the following observation:

Rolex Day/Date watches seem to depreciate more rapidly, on a percentage basis, than do stainless steel models, especially the "function/sport" watches such as Subs, GMTs, etc. Is this true & if so why?
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2010, 01:14 PM   #2
sakuraba
"TRF" Member
 
sakuraba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
Of the dress watches I was under the impression that the DD held its prices relatively well compared to DJs and OPs.

Compared to SS watches though, precious metal watches have not fared quite as well, DDs included.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black
F 16710 GMT Pepsi
F 16570 Explorer II white
T 16600 SD
D 16610 LV

"fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland
sakuraba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2010, 09:30 PM   #3
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
Ofcourse

A 35 year old DD will fetch something new prize then at minimum

A 35 year old SS watch has also maintained it's prize or better.

A 35 years old sportswatch will fetch 10X it's original price (any model)

I don't think there's a lot a depreciation.

There's almost nothing you've bought 35 years ago for daily use that's you can still use and kept its value like a Rolex watch.




Jack
Jackxv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2010, 01:31 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchicago View Post
...
Rolex Day/Date watches seem to depreciate more rapidly, on a percentage basis, than do stainless steel models, especially the "function/sport" watches such as Subs, GMTs, etc. Is this true & if so why?
Any used market functions on supply and demand..

The demand for Stainless Steel models is high and always has been. The demand for precious metal watches, which the DD is, is not high. Therefore market values stay high for sport watches because there is always somebody willing to pay.. Prices are pushed downward in the market for other models because the price needs to be set at a level where it will sell........

This is also true of the same sport models in Gold... they eventually drop to close to the value of their Stainless Steel counterparts...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2010, 02:05 AM   #5
hhh007
"TRF" Member
 
hhh007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Howard
Location: Midwest
Watch: 18078
Posts: 604
I find it amazing that you can buy a really nice older solid 18K gold Day-Date for about the same price as a new DSSD or GMTII in SS or whatever, I think they are a steal by comparison, especially considering gold is now near $1200.00 per oz. and what a beautiful and classic watch the older Presidents are.
__________________
Day-Date Bark Finish 18078,
TT Datejust Turn-O-Graph
Oysterquartz 17013
Explorer I 114270
hhh007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2010, 12:55 PM   #6
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by hhh007 View Post
I find it amazing that you can buy a really nice older solid 18K gold Day-Date for about the same price as a new DSSD or GMTII in SS or whatever, I think they are a steal by comparison, especially considering gold is now near $1200.00 per oz. and what a beautiful and classic watch the older Presidents are.
HHH you put it well. I've noticed the same. Only trouble about the vintage pieces is I hate to think about the potential for hacky dealer shortcuts that may have been taken to bring them to market.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.