ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Flaxmoore · 5 May 2010, 07:12 AM

After a year and a little change of being quite happy with my Invicta Pro Diver, tragedy hath struck- it died on me last week. It's proven to not be a battery or anything simple. My jeweler/watchmaker has it now to evaluate it, but I'm betting on it being a dead movement.

It's just out of warranty, and Invicta is being wholly unresponsive. If it's a movement, replacement would cost me about $100 by the time I'm done. With that said, I'm looking at a replacement. This time, I'm going automatic.

I love the look of the Orient Makos, old and new, and with a coupon code I found, I can snag either for under $125. $125 shipped for the 2010 Mako, $95 for the classic.

What are the pros and cons of the 2? I see the different looks, but how does the 2010 Mako justify the price difference?

5 May 2010, 07:12 AM	#1
Flaxmoore Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Casey Location: Toledo, Ohio Watch: Alpha Milsub Posts: 704	Orient New Mako vs. Orient Mako. After a year and a little change of being quite happy with my Invicta Pro Diver, tragedy hath struck- it died on me last week. It's proven to not be a battery or anything simple. My jeweler/watchmaker has it now to evaluate it, but I'm betting on it being a dead movement. It's just out of warranty, and Invicta is being wholly unresponsive. If it's a movement, replacement would cost me about $100 by the time I'm done. With that said, I'm looking at a replacement. This time, I'm going automatic. I love the look of the Orient Makos, old and new, and with a coupon code I found, I can snag either for under $125. $125 shipped for the 2010 Mako, $95 for the classic. What are the pros and cons of the 2? I see the different looks, but how does the 2010 Mako justify the price difference?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)