ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chipmunk · 14 May 2010, 01:27 AM

Which is a better complement to a TT GMTIIC[B]........SS SUB CERAMIC OR SS YM PLATINUM? Getting both would be the best answer but I must space out
my purchase very carefully or else my wife will kill me already.

OceanView · 14 May 2010, 03:36 AM

Ym ss/plat. Ss sub is too similar to your gmt

JUSTROLEXES · 14 May 2010, 03:39 AM

Yachtmaster for me... It provides a unique look IMO

Chipmunk · 14 May 2010, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OceanView

Ym ss/plat. Ss sub is too similar to your gmt

I thought so too, altough I still desire to own a sub c later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by justrolexes

Yachtmaster for me... It provides a unique look IMO

I'm also leaning toward the YM.

Renoir · 14 May 2010, 04:25 AM

Another vote for the PT YM

....the ceramics would look similar to the untrained eye.

Best of luck with your decision.

shandy · 14 May 2010, 04:51 AM

Another vote. For the YM!
Can't see much point in having lot's of similar looking watches!
Sub/GMT/deepsea/seadweller all loook virtually the same to me on the wrist!
I much prefer diversity in a collection!

hennabav · 14 May 2010, 04:52 AM

The not so common YM...although I would have to wait until the ceramic comes out to really decide.

DerekS · 14 May 2010, 05:02 AM

YACHTIE!!! perfect partner to the IIc. The red second hand is great.

Joey_V · 14 May 2010, 05:04 AM

In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick.

The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII.

Just my opinion.

tkc324 · 14 May 2010, 05:08 AM

Plat YM no doubt~

SDDS · 14 May 2010, 05:09 AM

platty ym

spuds · 14 May 2010, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey_V

In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick.

The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII.

Just my opinion.

Agreed.

niner niner seven · 14 May 2010, 06:42 AM

plat

mfer · 14 May 2010, 07:01 AM

Opps. Messed up.

deleted.

Get the Sub, still!

Chipmunk · 14 May 2010, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey_V

In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick.

The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII.

Just my opinion.

Thanks for your opinion

Puffy · 14 May 2010, 07:07 AM

Platty

dont_getit · 14 May 2010, 07:31 AM

YM, but what do I know, thats the only one I have...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chipmunk

Which is a better complement to a TT GMTIIC[B]........SS SUB CERAMIC OR SS YM PLATINUM? Getting both would be the best answer but I must space out
my purchase very carefully or else my wife will kill me already.

dont_getit · 14 May 2010, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey_V

In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick.

The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII.

Just my opinion.

I have had YM for only about a week, but I can tell you that it never gets boring. The dial is just awesome, it looks different based on the lighting, outdoor(in the shade is the best looking for me). I thought it was too much blingy when I wore the first time, but once I started to wear, I cant get it off of my wrist.

Chipmunk · 14 May 2010, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dont_getit

I have had YM for only about a week, but I can tell you that it never gets boring. The dial is just awesome, it looks different based on the lighting, outdoor(in the shade is the best looking for me). I thought it was too much blingy when I wore the first time, but once I started to wear, I cant get it off of my wrist.

Thanks for that inspiring comment.

mpkRolex · 14 May 2010, 09:06 AM

I had YM for a month but sold it as it did not grow on me...Ceramic GMTII for me

mpkRolex · 14 May 2010, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey_V

In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick.

The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII.

Just my opinion.

x2

PeteNYC13 · 14 May 2010, 09:08 AM

Who are you calling boring?!

-Pete

sBmRnR · 14 May 2010, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OceanView

Ym ss/plat. Ss sub is too similar to your gmt

x2

14 May 2010, 01:27 AM	#1
Chipmunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Alvin Location: So Cal Watch: ROLEXES Posts: 5,390	Ceramic VS Platinum......... Which is a better complement to a TT GMTIIC[B]........SS SUB CERAMIC OR SS YM PLATINUM? Getting both would be the best answer but I must space out my purchase very carefully or else my wife will kill me already. __________________ "A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

14 May 2010, 03:39 AM	#3
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,120	Yachtmaster for me... It provides a unique look IMO __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

14 May 2010, 04:25 AM	#5
Renoir "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Renato Location: New York Posts: 2,396	Another vote for the PT YM....the ceramics would look similar to the untrained eye. Best of luck with your decision.

14 May 2010, 05:04 AM	#9
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	In my opinion... the YM is a nice watch. A stunner especially at first glance. However, I feel that there's too much "silver/grey" there... to me, it gets boring pretty quick. The SubC is very nice looking and has a bit of variety to the design. Definitely not so monochrome. And I think it's different enough from your TT GMTII. Just my opinion. __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

14 May 2010, 05:09 AM	#11
SDDS "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Yazan Location: Canada Posts: 4,782	platty ym __________________ Patek Philippe 5167 Patek Philippe 5905P black dial Rolex Deepsea 116660 M series Rolex Oysterquartz 17000 N series Rolex OP 41MM 124300 Green Dial

14 May 2010, 03:36 AM	#2
OceanView "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: USA Posts: 123	Ym ss/plat. Ss sub is too similar to your gmt

14 May 2010, 04:51 AM	#6
shandy Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Ian Location: canada Posts: 1,724	Another vote. For the YM! Can't see much point in having lot's of similar looking watches! Sub/GMT/deepsea/seadweller all loook virtually the same to me on the wrist! I much prefer diversity in a collection!

14 May 2010, 04:52 AM	#7
hennabav Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jon Location: New England Watch: --Rolex-- Posts: 2,391	The not so common YM...although I would have to wait until the ceramic comes out to really decide.

14 May 2010, 05:02 AM	#8
DerekS "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Derek Location: Tennessee Watch: Rolex GMT IIc Posts: 160	YACHTIE!!! perfect partner to the IIc. The red second hand is great.

14 May 2010, 05:08 AM	#10
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	Plat YM no doubt~

14 May 2010, 06:42 AM	#13
niner niner seven "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Matthew Location: Rolex&911Nation Watch: GV Posts: 547	plat __________________ 16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV

14 May 2010, 07:01 AM	#14
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Opps. Messed up. deleted. Get the Sub, still! __________________ member#3242

14 May 2010, 07:07 AM	#16
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	Platty __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

14 May 2010, 09:06 AM	#20
mpkRolex 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Watch: Pepsi Posts: 2,170	I had YM for a month but sold it as it did not grow on me...Ceramic GMTII for me

14 May 2010, 09:08 AM	#22
PeteNYC13 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Pete Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,607	Who are you calling boring?! -Pete Attached Images __________________ SS Submariner K16610 SS Submariner F16610LV SS/P Yachtmaster M16622 SS Black Dial Daytona M116520 SS Explorer II D16570

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)