ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 June 2010, 04:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NYC
Watch: Explorers and Subs
Posts: 620
|
Clasp Concerns
Hello fellow TRF members
Just received my Rolex Explorer II back from service, after four months, got a full service and light polish. I am now living in NYC and have a question for everyone out there. My Explorer II came with the 78360 band with 501B endlinks, and a clasp that looks like this one: Here is my watch (sorry for the bad photo) Question: I would like to change the clasp to the flip lock oyster clasp because I don't trust the clasp I have on there now, especially living in Manhattan and dealing with high levels of theft. Can I easily change over the clasp on my watch without changing out the whole bracelet? If so, is there some way that I could do this through Rolex, or an independent watchmaker, or should I just search the classifieds for someone who is selling a flip clasp? I apologize if some of the terms I used are not right, I am still learning the lingo of the different numberings and Rolex terminology. Thanks all, happy Friday! |
12 June 2010, 09:20 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
You can change out the clasp by unscrewing the links that attach it to the bracelet halves. The problem will be finding a clasp by itself that is in good condition..
You could also find yourself a 78790 bracelet that is corrrect for the Exp II and has the fliplock clasp. It too uses the 501b end-links.. Rolex or Rolex Dealers will not generally help you with these things. Since you are in New York, you could take off the bracelet, put on an old ratty strap, and take it in asking for a replacement 78790 bracelet. They may sell one to you and install it for around 800 bucks..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
12 June 2010, 09:45 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
I have a 1601 with the same clasp and I have had no trouble with it failing me and I am a safe technician that uses my hands all day drilling safes and if the clasp was not a good one it would have failed the first week I had it.
|
12 June 2010, 09:48 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
I have 2 1655 explorer 2's w/ that clasp, have had them since new, never a problem...it's my favorite style clasp, I like it better than the newer ones that mimic the oyster bracelet links.
|
12 June 2010, 08:05 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Quote:
The bigger fliplock clasp (from the 93150 bracelet) needs the divers extension part as well, or you can use it without the extension, but it is bigger. Your watch came originally with the 78360 bracelet - or with the 93150 as an option, so getting a 93150 bracelet would keep your watch to original specifications. Like you I feel more comfortable with a fliplock, or oysterlock, clasp and I prefer the smaller oysterlock since I never use the diver's extension... Nice Explorer by the way! Best, A |
|
15 June 2010, 12:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NYC
Watch: Explorers and Subs
Posts: 620
|
Thanks for the info guys
I guess now it is time to hunt down a clasp to replace it with!! It is not that I have a problem with the clasp on the watch now, but the flip lock just gives me that extra piece of mind when riding the subway back and forth to work. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.