ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 June 2010, 12:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
rolex and panerai?
i would describe myself as a panerai guy, i own a 243, and have owned a 88 and 24. before that an omega. i joined TRF out of curiosity AND RESPECT FOR THE BRAND. i find myself very attracted to the sub no date and wonder if there are many PAM owners who also have Rolexs? no flames please i am a fan of both brands, just trying to hear from those who have both, the differences, how owning both happened? just collecting or if both brands are in a rotation? I am intentionally asking here in the PAM forum of TRF.
THANKS.... B
__________________
Bugsy |
13 June 2010, 02:07 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
I own both brands, not collecting, both brands (and a few others :) ) are in rotation. Difference-wise, obviously, is in the size; the PAM has a more substantial wrist presence, simply by virtue of the fact that it is present on a much more substantial area of the wrist. :) I've seen several folks checking it out, and it's cool because I could tell that they didn't know what it was, but were definitely into the watch (used to get the same thing a lot with my Breitling, as I was wearing it before the brand was as widely known and adopted here as it is at present).
What else...it has better lume than the Rolexes, which isn't a factor in terms of viewing for me most of the time, but the green hue it imparts at times is pretty cool-looking. What I find most impressive is how versatile it is: it adapts perfectly to either the black croc for a more dressy look, or the rubber strap for a sportier, casual look, and it pulls both looks off flawlessly. But comparing it to Rolex is to me an apple-orange thing to me as they're both quite different, which is fine with me, as wearing the same brand/style all of the time would get boring...I love all of my watches, and I buy them because they sing to me, I have no qualms about switching between brands. I kind of try to match them stylistically and color-wise to whatever I'm wearing, makes for a sharper look imo. How owning both happened? I actually came across a Panerai at a local jeweler a few years back and was intrigued; I basically knew zip about the brand or its meteoric rise in popularity over the last decade or so, but I just liked it, the dial really appealed to me for some reason that I've never been able to put my finger on; there's just something about it that tickles my fancy. Just kind of put it off until the pull was just too strong to resist, and so here I am. And I'm a very happy camper, it's in very heavy rotation right now.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
13 June 2010, 02:16 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
I'm the other way around - serial Rolex owner, but PAM-curious.
I don't see anything wrong with ownership of both brands. WISs find beauty in anything that ticks (sweeps). Wearing a 111 made me feel like it was so huge on my wrist since my point of reference is a 40mm oyster. I'm guessing you would feel the other way and find the Sub too small. But if your wrist is fine with the rotation, then all is good! Hope this helped.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
13 June 2010, 02:36 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wichita Falls,TX
Watch: Rolex,PAM
Posts: 525
|
I found this forum during my sublv purchase...then boughtan expII shortly after joining,but just bought a Pam after seeing all the pics from owners here in the forum. Didn't really even know what Panerai was 6 months ago,but my 111 is a watch i'll never part with(much like my Rolex's)!!
I think alot of us on here own both if im not mistaken! |
13 June 2010, 04:38 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dominik
Location: Zürich
Watch: Rolex, Patek, FPJ
Posts: 381
|
Yep, both brands here too. 111, 210 a Daytona and Sub.
|
13 June 2010, 08:26 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I tend to look at the brands as distant cousins. Early Pams used Rolex movements and both have a military heritage.
Certainly room for both for me. |
13 June 2010, 10:03 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Rolex and Panerai? Simple - they are perfect partners!
Cheers
__________________
|
13 June 2010, 11:42 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
__________________
My grails: |
13 June 2010, 11:52 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the Middle
Posts: 903
|
Hard to say either or. Love them both and owned (own) them both and there is clearly room for each terrific brand in my little collection!
__________________
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat |
14 June 2010, 12:47 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: UK
Posts: 953
|
I agree I find the watches complementary in style. They definitely attact two different types of fans, however, there's definitely a large overlap between the two camps.
__________________
Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009) |
14 June 2010, 11:33 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
Love them both!! there's room for both brands in my collection.
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. |
14 June 2010, 11:38 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I own a sub, a GMT IIc and a Pam 111.
I wear them all in rotation. They all have their times to wear. The 111 dresses up and down depending on the strap. For awhile I thought I was hooked on the big watches. But, I'd rather have a variety of watches and sizes. I'm considering all sizes from the new 39mm Expy, 40mm Daytona, 42mm speedy, 45mm 210, etc and so on. My thought is that Rolex isn't the end all be all, neither is Panerai, nor any other brand. Collecting them all and making choices and decisions is what is so enjoyable to me.
__________________
member#3242 |
14 June 2010, 11:38 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Watch: EXP2-42, DJ2, SMPO
Posts: 347
|
Have a PAM-251 & DSSD....could not think of a better combo!!!!! All bases covered!!!!! Metal bracelet on the DSSD and unlimited strap choices for the PAM;-)
|
14 June 2010, 12:16 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
|
They go tougher well. As a long time Rolex guy, I eased into PAM with no problems.
-Eddie
__________________
|
14 June 2010, 12:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
I only have one PAM right now. LOVE my 111
And I own a Rolex or two as well... |
14 June 2010, 12:28 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
Up until 3 months ago I wouldn't have worn a Pam, now I own three. I didn't think I'd like the large size after being used to the 38-40 mm range. Now I won't but another watch smaller than 40 mm and truely love rotating all my watches (currently 8) in a top secret rotation that only I understand .
I love mixing up the sizes and brands of the various watches and the Pam's, with the numerous strap options, really lets you shake it up. You can't go wrong with Rolex or Paneria, IMO. |
14 June 2010, 12:40 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Colin
Location: Charleston, SC
Watch: LV, EXPII, BLNR
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
14 June 2010, 01:53 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
I own many different brands, but Panerai and Rolex are the ones I have the most of at any given time. They are alike yet very different. Both watches have interesting history and devoted followings. However, they are very different in terms of wrist presence. I also like that everyone knows Rolex and just about noone (at least in the circles I run in) know Panerai.
|
14 June 2010, 02:17 PM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
|
Quote:
the panerai is different, its BOLD |
|
14 June 2010, 02:25 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
LOL... i got my panerai after joining TRF as well.... this site is contagious....
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
15 June 2010, 05:54 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wichita Falls,TX
Watch: Rolex,PAM
Posts: 525
|
|
15 June 2010, 08:33 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Rolex/Paneri & Omega/Paneri goes well together... arent they? |
15 June 2010, 01:12 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
2 very different animals.
rolex is subtle and its elegance and comfort is shared only by owner and watch. pam is loud and tough. get both! you'll be happy with them |
15 June 2010, 09:39 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Norway
Posts: 311
|
Nothing wrong with owning both PAMs and Rollies! They`re both great brands in their own ways. I own a 312k and a sub 16610.
But the thing is, if you are used to owning a Rolex, you might be used to buying the occasional $10 NATO strap, but if you own a PAM, you gotta get used to buying the occasional $200 custom strap |
20 June 2010, 04:10 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
They're partner!!!
|
21 June 2010, 03:40 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 42
|
Two great tastes that taste great together
|
22 June 2010, 11:30 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
2 Rolexes and 2 PAMs for me. Find that they complement well:
- 88 for travel - Milgauss for more formal - 312 for everyday - DSSD when I want to feel indestructable
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
22 June 2010, 12:19 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
I love both brands.
|
24 June 2010, 09:20 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DXB
Posts: 166
|
For me, got my 111 then only the Milgauss GV. Loving both of them.
Thanks to my wife for encouraging the purchases.
__________________
PAM 183, Q series & PAM 531, R Series DJII green Romans Sub C LV "The Hulk" GMT II K Serial, Submariner TT LB Milgauss GV and PAM 111 - FLIPPED!! Oris TT3 Day/Date, Seamaster 2254.50 |
25 June 2010, 12:23 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 475
|
I also have a 243. I actually started with Rolex, then got into Panerai. Both are awesome. The Deepsea is definitely a great counterpart to the 243! The No-date may feel a bit small, but is still a great piece if you can get used to the size differences.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.