The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 June 2010, 02:22 AM   #1
33JS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Scotland
Watch: SD 50th Ann
Posts: 444
Rumours of NEW Sea Dweller!!!

Maybe now is the time to sell the BNIB 16600 SD's!!

Heard a rumour from 2 AD's that due to the poor sales of the Deep Sea (and I love mine) that Rolex will withdraw it and replace with a new, smaller cased, ceramic bezel'd, glidelock clasped Sea Dweller!

Could mean a few things:

- 16600 SD's won't appreciate much now - but still a great watch!

- DSSD's may be a very 'short run' model and actually hold their already eroded values due to limited supply.

- The "new" SD will have the BEST of all Sea Dweller worlds!

I submitted a 'letter of intent' to my favourite AD on Saturday, though it may be a long time before they hit the stores.
33JS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 02:41 AM   #2
jwkunkle
2024 Pledge Member
 
jwkunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Josh
Location: Indiana
Watch: The Next One
Posts: 645
Has Rolex ever moved that quickly before? Released a brand new model and then discontinue it immediately? Seems like there would be an awful lot of R&D wasted.
jwkunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 02:44 AM   #3
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Well first could never see the 16600 appreciate much its not changed since 1988 except for a case stamp.So sure must quite a few in this world today and all the same except for a letter or so.Cannot see the withdrawal of the DSSD Rolex has invested far too much money in this watch.But could see the SD being still part of the Rolex line up perhaps with the ceramic insert and new clasp.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 02:50 AM   #4
33JS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Scotland
Watch: SD 50th Ann
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well first could never see the 16600 appreciate much its not changed since 1988 except for a case stamp.So sure must quite a few in this world today and all the same except for a letter or so.Cannot see the withdrawal of the DSSD Rolex has invested far too much money in this watch.But could see the SD being still part of the Rolex line up perhaps with the ceramic insert and new clasp.

Could be correct on the DSSD, perhaps they will keep it as a live model, but just accept the even lower sales a new SD would create for it...

Exciting prospect though as I always loved the 16600, but felt the clasp always let it down!
33JS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 02:51 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Does Rolex launch ANYTHING outside of the annual Basel World show in March?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 02:54 AM   #6
33JS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Scotland
Watch: SD 50th Ann
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Does Rolex launch ANYTHING outside of the annual Basel World show in March?

The rumours were that they're working/planning it, it's definitely not been launched yet!
33JS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:02 AM   #7
vtsnowplow
"TRF" Member
 
vtsnowplow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 345
that would be great. maxi dial, larger 40mm case, new clasp same sd. what a watch it would be.
vtsnowplow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:03 AM   #8
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33JS View Post
Could be correct on the DSSD, perhaps they will keep it as a live model, but just accept the even lower sales a new SD would create for it...

Exciting prospect though as I always loved the 16600, but felt the clasp always let it down!
Well myself have used and abused my SD over several years with many hours underwater never had a problem with clasp.That was until one day hanging over the side of a boat with my 15 plus stone danging by the bracelet a spring-bar failed.And a good job it did watch lost to the abyss but I still got my wrist
.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:06 AM   #9
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I thought they made a big mistake by discontinuing the old SD. Maybe an update to the old SD will please enough people to make them pick one up.
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:13 AM   #10
33JS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Scotland
Watch: SD 50th Ann
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well myself have used and abused my SD over several years with many hours underwater never had a problem with clasp.That was until one day hanging over the side of a boat with my 15 plus stone danging by the bracelet a spring-bar failed.And a good job it did watch lost to the abyss but I still got my wrist
.

Cool story! Any watch would do well to hang in there for a while under those conditions.

I know the clasp was robust, but I had an old Camel Trophy watch from the 80's and the clasp on that was folded steel very much like the 16600 and I just thought that let it down. The glidelock on my DSSD is a work of art!! An SD with that would be ace!
33JS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:25 AM   #11
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33JS View Post
Cool story! Any watch would do well to hang in there for a while under those conditions.

I know the clasp was robust, but I had an old Camel Trophy watch from the 80's and the clasp on that was folded steel very much like the 16600 and I just thought that let it down. The glidelock on my DSSD is a work of art!! An SD with that would be ace!
While I would agree the glidelock like you say is a work of art,its new and has not been really tested in the field.While the plain clasp has stood the test of time on millions upon millions of Rolex watches for 4 plus decades.
So its well proved in the market place, lets hope the glidelock can measure up as well but only time will tell on that one.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:27 AM   #12
datejust1
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: G
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 6,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I thought they made a big mistake by discontinuing the old SD. Maybe an update to the old SD will please enough people to make them pick one up.
x2
datejust1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:42 AM   #13
Clogger
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SE Asia
Watch: SS Sub Date
Posts: 431
Since when have AD's really had a clue as to what is going on at Rolex R&D?? No doubt they are spinning their usual BS drivel

I know lets all discuss what it will look like for the next year only to be disapointed come Basel
Clogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:53 AM   #14
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
I agree w/ Padi...too much $ spent to make the DSSD. Can't see it going away any time soon.
I'll leave this question to the experts - has their ever been a reference that's been resurrected in Rolex history?
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 03:55 AM   #15
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Just my humble opinion........almost the worst source for Rolex information is an AD.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 04:03 AM   #16
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
I'll bet there's no more than 3 people at Rolex that really know what is going to happen. ADs would be the LAST in the food chain - and even when they are told, they still don't get it...
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 04:16 AM   #17
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Hmm, well my boss, who has had the chance to speak with the Rolex rep, as well as several important figures in Rolex UK recently, certainly hasn't heard anything like that. The Deepsea has been a decent success, we certainly don't hold on for one for too long, and in my experience, has been a steadier seller than the 16600. I think the Deepsea will be here to stay.
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 04:24 AM   #18
springbar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by nauticajoe View Post
I agree w/ Padi...too much $ spent to make the DSSD. Can't see it going away any time soon.
I hope a company like Rolex has its act together enough not to plan operations based on the sunk cost fallacy.

But it is probably fair to say that Rolex wouldn't have spent the money in the first place if they didn't know there would be demand. Still, companies make mistakes.

That said, the best reason to be skeptical is the source. How could they know this?
springbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 04:28 AM   #19
jwkunkle
2024 Pledge Member
 
jwkunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Josh
Location: Indiana
Watch: The Next One
Posts: 645
Rolex had been criticized by some as not offering a larger diameter sport watch, following the trend of most manufacturers with the "bigger is better" mentality. I can't believe that they would finally release a bigger version, then discontinue immediately.

How does anyone know how many units have been sold and if that is considered a disappointment? I thought Rolex never releases that information.
jwkunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 05:32 AM   #20
winston
"TRF" Member
 
winston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Watch: All of them
Posts: 312
Rolex sold very few 16600 SD compared to the sub and the sales volume of the deepsea will be similar, the main issue with the deepsea is the price which puts it beyond most people when they can spend their hard earned money on other watches in the range. They will not discontinue the deep sea the Swiss are too proud to do it. That's my view anyway. I love mine!!!
__________________
==================================================
116506, 116508 Green, 116619, 116719, 116660, 126660 D-Blue, 126600, 126610LV, 226570 Polar, 116600, 116610LN, 116710LN, 116500 Panda, 16610LV, 16600, 16610, 16570 Polar, 16710 Pepsi.
winston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 05:48 AM   #21
Alessi156
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los/Lon
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by nauticajoe View Post
- has their ever been a reference that's been resurrected in Rolex history?
The Milguass was recently resurrected.
Alessi156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:08 AM   #22
acce1999
"TRF" Member
 
acce1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
Rumours are ... rumours. I'd rather see Rolex launch a Daytona with a black old style aluminium tachy bezel .... and superjubilee.
acce1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:30 AM   #23
JC1305us
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Watch: GMT II 16710 BLRO
Posts: 43
I'm sure there are MANY worse selling models from Rolex (YMII anyone?) and they ain't going anywhere. With all the R+D that went into the watch, they would be making a huge mistake. (And this from a guy that thinks the watch is too big anyway)
JC1305us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:33 AM   #24
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
That rumor is almost to good to be true. I love the classic SD and thought Rolex was out of it's mind to release something so thick and heavy with the same skinny bracelet.

I would have to really consider buying one if they released another SD model, especially if it was about 42mm and not so thick.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:34 AM   #25
1000ftSub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
Hmm, well my boss, who has had the chance to speak with the Rolex rep, as well as several important figures in Rolex UK recently, certainly hasn't heard anything like that. The Deepsea has been a decent success, we certainly don't hold on for one for too long, and in my experience, has been a steadier seller than the 16600. I think the Deepsea will be here to stay.
The deepsea is a good watch.
1000ftSub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:35 AM   #26
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Just my humble opinion........almost the worst source for Rolex information is an AD.


X2
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:39 AM   #27
dinan545bmw
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 365
Well, for what it's worth -

I just spoke with the marketing and distribution division with Rolex USA (212-758-7700) regarding this rumour.

First off, the rep was absolutely floored and stunned with what I had just shared and that it was the 'first' time he had ever even heard of this scenario - as they are well "connected" with their parent Swiss entity (his exact words).

They went on by reassuring me that there were absolutely NO present or future plans for phasing out the current production model DSSD for a new 'modified' SeaDweller model (incorporating old and new features), but at a more reasonable and lower price point.

Period.

And until they hear officially and otherwise from Geneva, the current DS will remain an integral offering in their production sports models by Rolex.

So there you have it; straight from the horse's mouth or one of the lead mules anyway!?

Well, either Rolex USA could be outright misrepresenting the facts, being very secretive or they're simply ignorant and just as totally clueless about this as all of us.

But the rep did congratulate me on my recent purchase and told me to enjoy my watch regardless of will or won't happen.

Ha ha.

Definitely won't argue with this last point for sure!

BEST REGARDS
dinan545bmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:42 AM   #28
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
Hmm, well my boss, who has had the chance to speak with the Rolex rep, as well as several important figures in Rolex UK recently, certainly hasn't heard anything like that. The Deepsea has been a decent success, we certainly don't hold on for one for too long, and in my experience, has been a steadier seller than the 16600. I think the Deepsea will be here to stay.
Ok, maybe there is one AD where their guy knows his stuff!

But you are the exception to the rule!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 06:52 AM   #29
TurboWatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,641
the perfect Rolex

A 43 mm DSSD, but reduce the depth rating to the SD which allows the thickness to be cut to around 13mm-14mm. Same domed crystal, matte maxi dial and the glidelock clasp. MSRP around $7k-$8K.
TurboWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2010, 07:34 AM   #30
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
First, I would buy one in a heartbeat. Second, Rolex is very secretive, so don't...

put too much stock in what an AD tells you. It would be one quadrillion times more likely the Forum would know about anything before an AD would.
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.