ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 June 2010, 07:10 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 803
|
Question about lug-holes vs. no lug-holes ...
I know that the newer Submariners and Sea Dwellers use spring bars to attach the bracelet to the case. My question is do the older Sea Dwellers (and Submariner No-Date) that have lug-holes also use spring bars to attach the bracelet or do they use friction pins?
Thanks, Jonathan Bar-on |
16 June 2010, 08:53 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
They are all attached with spring-bars....
The through-hole lugs use a spring-bar with larger diameter and longer length pivots that extend through the lug... The newer ones use spring-bars with pivots that are smaller in diameter and these only extend about half way into the lug.....
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
16 June 2010, 09:42 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 803
|
Tools,
Thanks a lot for the information Is one set up more secure than the other? Jonathan |
16 June 2010, 03:43 PM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I would say that the through holes, with the proper spring bars, is quite a bit more secure and sronger (greater shear strength) than the non-hole lugs and spring-bars....
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
17 June 2010, 06:03 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal OC U.S.A.
Posts: 342
|
No doubt, the through holes are stronger.
Also it is much easier to remove or change the bracelet with through holes. Seems to be a change based on style over function. Mark |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.