ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Poohsan · 19 August 2010, 02:07 PM

I can’t get the new ceramic models out of my head. I’m not sure what is drawing me to them; clasp, bezel, case….

At this time I can’t afford to get one so I’m considering flipping two of my watches to cover the cost.

I’m wondering if I will regret the flip. My GMT is a great set with oyster and jubilee bracelets, Pepsi, Coke, and black bezels. The Sub is my daily wearer.

I also can’t decide which ceramic I would like to get. DSSD, GMT, Sub?

I know I need a GMT as travel a lot for work. But each watch has different features and I’m not sure which one will make me happy.

Oh the agony of indecision…..

Eric88 · 19 August 2010, 02:11 PM

You're just like me as I have been considering almost the exact same flip for the Sub-C. I can't stop thinking about it.

In fact, you can read all about it right here. 78 respondents to my poll should be a pretty good enabler for you to decide.

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:12 PM

Are you positively sure of you indecision?

If so, you may need to meet with the TRF Sub-c Marketing Manager (Eric88).

He will shoot ya straight!

:-)

urwtdrm · 19 August 2010, 02:15 PM

You could always buy another of the watch you miss most between the two. I can tell you my GmtIIc is still something I stare at after over two years of owning it!

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric88

You're just like me as I have been considering almost the exact same flip for the Sub-C. I can't stop thinking about it.

In fact, you can read all about it right here. 78 respondents to my poll should be a pretty good enabler for you to decide.

You backup that title so well. What a resume!

Poohsan · 19 August 2010, 02:22 PM

34 people say no way
25 say wait a while.
19 say go for it.
Hum....

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poohsan

34 people say no way
25 say wait a while.
19 say go for it.
Hum....

If common sense is not common, then minority rules.

Dr. Robert · 19 August 2010, 02:26 PM

No, non, nein, nyet!!!!!!!

Poohsan · 19 August 2010, 02:30 PM

2 for 1?

It would simplify my life. More wrist time for each watch... I hope.

Oh the agony of indecision…..

Speed · 19 August 2010, 02:37 PM

I would NOT get rid of a GMTII.

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:37 PM

Elagance is in simplicity.

Compare a front yard in Florida to one in Switzerland.

Ever heard of Swiss Flamingos?

Hope this helps in your indecision.

Poohsan · 19 August 2010, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonsundberg

Elagance is in simplicity.

Compare a front yard in Florida to one in Switzerland.

Ever heard of Swiss Flamingos?

Hope this helps in your indecision.

This logic is infallible!!

darthmouse · 19 August 2010, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speed

I would NOT get rid of a GMTII.

x2 Especially considering all the choices you have with it.

toolr · 19 August 2010, 02:47 PM

It's obviously up to you but, I wouldn't sell the GMT or the Sub. The ceramic models will be made for years to come so when you can afford to add one it will be there.

Poohsan · 19 August 2010, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darthmouse

x2 Especially considering all the choices you have with it.

Yes... It's all the goodies that make this watch great. It has tones of combinations.

Maybe I can acquire a modern clap for my GMT. Then I can have the best of both worlds.

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poohsan

This logic is infallible!!

Most front yards of the mind do not share my value systems.

Money should not determine a decision.
Values should.

If you value a Swiss landscape within the den of your watch collection, then go get your passport and fly first-class with no regrets.

tulsaokusa · 19 August 2010, 02:55 PM

Of course, any Rolex will provide an ample Swiss landscape.

;-)

Traveler · 19 August 2010, 03:07 PM

Sell 2 to get 1..ya gotta do what you gotta do I guess.

bawlin · 19 August 2010, 03:31 PM

Yes you should because I'm the market to buy both those watches.

sakuraba · 20 August 2010, 09:01 AM

I wouldn't trade 2 classics for 1 ceramic.

Discontinued references are now a finite quantity. The ceramics, however, are still recently introduced and will still command the usual new-model price.

Keep the 2 and save up for a pre-loved Ceramic. A year from now, when the hype dies down, and you still want to trade for it, it might cost you only one watch instead of 2.

dligg72 · 20 August 2010, 12:27 PM

keep your watches and buy a Sub-C when you can afford it.

ersnyder · 20 August 2010, 12:46 PM

Hold on to what you got, save your bucks and get the ceramic later.

buke45 · 20 August 2010, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speed

I would NOT get rid of a GMTII.

I agree 100% especially if it is a Pepsi

tbudd · 20 August 2010, 01:04 PM

Having owned the same watches and now owning the GMTIIc and having viewed the new Sub-c here is my opinion for what it is worth:

Trade up and get a GMTIIc. This watch is heavenly in every respect! I have owned it for over two years and I am as delighted when I look at it daily as I was the first day I bought it. Very functional and practical. I have flipped many a Rolex over the years, but I will sell my house before I sell this model and that is no joke! Yes, my priorities are screwed up! I think.

On the other hand having viewed and tried the Sub-c, I would not trade up for it. Simply because a dive watch really serves no purpose (unless you are a serious diver!). Even then, why would you dive with a 7k+ watch as beutiful as that? It is a gorgeous watch; but one ceramic is enough IMHO.

FLB03TT · 20 August 2010, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonsundberg

Elagance is in simplicity.

Compare a front yard in Florida to one in Switzerland.

Ever heard of Swiss Flamingos?

Hope this helps in your indecision.

What

tulsaokusa · 20 August 2010, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLB03TT

What

He understood.

;-)

Watch Fan · 20 August 2010, 02:37 PM

I would keep the classics and wait for the new one. The new one will only get less expensive and easier to get. You have plenty of time. The classics are getting harder to find and more expensive. Think about it!

mborkow · 20 August 2010, 02:42 PM

keep one classic and flip the other. with the $ from the flipped one, purchase a used ceramic (GMT IIc)

Tek · 20 August 2010, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

I wouldn't trade 2 classics for 1 ceramic.

Discontinued references are now a finite quantity. The ceramics, however, are still recently introduced and will still command the usual new-model price.

Keep the 2 and save up for a pre-loved Ceramic. A year from now, when the hype dies down, and you still want to trade for it, it might cost you only one watch instead of 2.

Oh yeah!

. But what ever make you happy, that's what important

wilfreb · 20 August 2010, 03:17 PM

get a Cerachrom Rolex, sell the others, you wont be disappointed.

19 August 2010, 02:07 PM	#1
Poohsan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Arron Location: phoenix, AZ Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 764	Should I flip my GMT and Sub for a new ceramic sports model? I can’t get the new ceramic models out of my head. I’m not sure what is drawing me to them; clasp, bezel, case…. At this time I can’t afford to get one so I’m considering flipping two of my watches to cover the cost. I’m wondering if I will regret the flip. My GMT is a great set with oyster and jubilee bracelets, Pepsi, Coke, and black bezels. The Sub is my daily wearer. I also can’t decide which ceramic I would like to get. DSSD, GMT, Sub? I know I need a GMT as travel a lot for work. But each watch has different features and I’m not sure which one will make me happy. Oh the agony of indecision….. __________________ 1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170

19 August 2010, 02:15 PM	#4
urwtdrm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Kyle Location: Sacramento, CA Watch: 18238 Day Date Posts: 238	You could always buy another of the watch you miss most between the two. I can tell you my GmtIIc is still something I stare at after over two years of owning it! __________________ "I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women.... The other half I wasted" -W.C. Fields 18238 Day-Date

19 August 2010, 02:22 PM	#6
Poohsan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Arron Location: phoenix, AZ Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 764	34 people say no way 25 say wait a while. 19 say go for it. Hum.... __________________ 1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170

19 August 2010, 02:30 PM	#9
Poohsan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Arron Location: phoenix, AZ Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 764	2 for 1? It would simplify my life. More wrist time for each watch... I hope. Oh the agony of indecision….. __________________ 1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170

20 August 2010, 09:01 AM	#20
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	I wouldn't trade 2 classics for 1 ceramic. Discontinued references are now a finite quantity. The ceramics, however, are still recently introduced and will still command the usual new-model price. Keep the 2 and save up for a pre-loved Ceramic. A year from now, when the hype dies down, and you still want to trade for it, it might cost you only one watch instead of 2. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

19 August 2010, 02:11 PM	#2
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	You're just like me as I have been considering almost the exact same flip for the Sub-C. I can't stop thinking about it. In fact, you can read all about it right here. 78 respondents to my poll should be a pretty good enabler for you to decide.

19 August 2010, 02:12 PM	#3
tulsaokusa Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: N/A Location: N/A Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC Posts: 773	Are you positively sure of you indecision? If so, you may need to meet with the TRF Sub-c Marketing Manager (Eric88). He will shoot ya straight! :-)

19 August 2010, 02:26 PM	#8
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,277	No, non, nein, nyet!!!!!!!

19 August 2010, 02:37 PM	#10
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	I would NOT get rid of a GMTII.

19 August 2010, 02:47 PM	#14
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,369	It's obviously up to you but, I wouldn't sell the GMT or the Sub. The ceramic models will be made for years to come so when you can afford to add one it will be there.

19 August 2010, 02:55 PM	#17
tulsaokusa Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: N/A Location: N/A Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC Posts: 773	Of course, any Rolex will provide an ample Swiss landscape. ;-)

19 August 2010, 03:07 PM	#18
Traveler Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 374	Sell 2 to get 1..ya gotta do what you gotta do I guess.

19 August 2010, 03:31 PM	#19
bawlin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Posts: 210	Yes you should because I'm the market to buy both those watches.

20 August 2010, 12:27 PM	#21
dligg72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: california Posts: 138	keep your watches and buy a Sub-C when you can afford it.

20 August 2010, 12:46 PM	#22
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	Hold on to what you got, save your bucks and get the ceramic later.

20 August 2010, 01:04 PM	#24
tbudd Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Houston Posts: 54	Having owned the same watches and now owning the GMTIIc and having viewed the new Sub-c here is my opinion for what it is worth: Trade up and get a GMTIIc. This watch is heavenly in every respect! I have owned it for over two years and I am as delighted when I look at it daily as I was the first day I bought it. Very functional and practical. I have flipped many a Rolex over the years, but I will sell my house before I sell this model and that is no joke! Yes, my priorities are screwed up! I think. On the other hand having viewed and tried the Sub-c, I would not trade up for it. Simply because a dive watch really serves no purpose (unless you are a serious diver!). Even then, why would you dive with a 7k+ watch as beutiful as that? It is a gorgeous watch; but one ceramic is enough IMHO.

20 August 2010, 02:37 PM	#27
Watch Fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: California Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 676	I would keep the classics and wait for the new one. The new one will only get less expensive and easier to get. You have plenty of time. The classics are getting harder to find and more expensive. Think about it!

20 August 2010, 02:42 PM	#28
mborkow "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: san francisco Watch: gmt2c pam372 Posts: 842	keep one classic and flip the other. with the $ from the flipped one, purchase a used ceramic (GMT IIc)

20 August 2010, 03:17 PM	#30
wilfreb "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Miami Posts: 537	get a Cerachrom Rolex, sell the others, you wont be disappointed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)