ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 August 2010, 09:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
Rolex Service - before and after.
Before my GMT went in for its 6 year service it was running at + 2 a day. Now, after 12 weeks and back from a Rolex service its running at + 12!!!
Sounds like they forgot to regulate it so I will have to pop in to get it seen to. Hopefuly it is only a quick regulation. But it makes one worry about what else they forgot to do.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
19 August 2010, 09:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: DFW
Watch: 16610
Posts: 558
|
That stinks. Hopefully they fix it without a hassle
|
19 August 2010, 09:39 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
Well i had a breitling before i bought the two daytonas that i have now and when it was sent for service it came back with a scratched crystal.
It took the watch another 3 weeks in repair time.. Total time spend at Breitling 2months!! I hope rolex is not as bad, however, it concerns me on how you have been badly looked after. |
19 August 2010, 09:42 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,216
|
That is troubling, David. Hope you can get is sorted in short order.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
21 August 2010, 01:29 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
I feel bad now for slandering Rolex.
I took my GMT into Rolex St James's today. I love going there - so hushed and professional. They tested my GMT which was running at an exceptional + 0.5. The technician thinks that something temporarily impeded the hairspring. A glob of oil perhaps. This can sometimes happen when a watch has been freshly lubricated. They offered to keep it in and check it for a few days or else I should monitor it myself and report any further problems. I chose the latter. A couple of things he told me - 1. Crown up or crown down makes no difference on recent models, except, perhaps, when the watch is approaching its service period. 2. GMT bezels will be in stock for years to come yet. 3. Nothing yet on a Pepsi or Coke ceramic GMT. It looks unlikely - but of course the technician is not privy to Rolex Research and Development. But I think it's pretty unlikely as well.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
21 August 2010, 02:27 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
If they really want to do the pepsi/coke bezel they could always do it as 2 parts with a thin metal cover over the seam. I'm sure it would look fine, different, but fine.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
21 August 2010, 02:43 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Quote:
Considering it will be sitting in the insert, a two piece arrangement would be fine.
__________________
..33 |
|
21 August 2010, 02:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
|
21 August 2010, 03:00 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Hawaii
Watch: 5512
Posts: 911
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Milgauss GV (100m 330 feet) (2010) * Rolex Submariner 5512 (200m 660 feet) (1961) |
|
21 August 2010, 03:08 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Q Branch
Watch: 1680
Posts: 88
|
I have noticed this with my newish 11610. No matter what orientation it's in, it loses about 1.5 sec per day (not complaining). My 1680, on the other hand, is very sensitive to orientation (again, not complaining).
|
21 August 2010, 06:43 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
I think this would work. It seems the only way to get a Pepsi/ Coke back into the Rolex line up. Without these two iconic styles the Rolex line is somewhat lacking. Introducing colour in other ways - the smurf blue Subs or Green dial GMT - it's just not the same.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
21 August 2010, 06:44 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
|
21 August 2010, 06:47 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
Yes - I think there is some truth in the crown up/ crown down positioning. After all, Rolex used to issue an instruction sheet with this advice.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
21 August 2010, 06:54 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,648
|
Quote:
But sometimes my GMTIIc loses some time when it's crown up at nights... |
|
21 August 2010, 07:08 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
I had exactly the opposite experience, before my Daytona went to the Dallas RSC, it was between +6 and +8 a day! Ever since it's been back, I have been tracking it and the absolutely worst reading was -9 seconds IN A MONTH! And usually it was about 6 or 7 seconds slow for the month. I know people say they don't ever want their watch to be slow, but roughly 1 and 1/2 minutes slow PER YEAR is well within my standards.
|
21 August 2010, 07:12 AM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
|
Quote:
|
|
21 August 2010, 08:27 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.