ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mtlguy · 27 August 2010, 10:26 PM

We all know how popular the Submariner is, but is its styling really that nice compared to some other brands diving watches (Breitling)?

If you want to own a Rolex and you don't dive would you consider a nicer styped watch like the Milgauss vs the Sub-C?

z32turbo · 27 August 2010, 10:28 PM

Sub-C all the way. I don't like not having the date even on a Rolex.

Frogman4me · 27 August 2010, 10:29 PM

Sub C, I am not a fan of the lightning bolt hand

esm · 27 August 2010, 10:31 PM

Sub is an iconic Rolex, so that would be a great 1 rolex, even if you dont dive.
On the other hand, the Milgauss is a more dressy watch, it is beautiful imo.
If you want a dressy rolex, should look into the DJ range (if you must have a date function)

Andrés G · 27 August 2010, 10:32 PM

I would rather have a Sub C that any Breitling diver or a Milgauss. Since we´re talking about styling, it comes down to a personal decision.

Mtlguy · 28 August 2010, 12:26 AM

Does anyone thin the Green Milgauss look will get "tired" quick?

gmt master x · 28 August 2010, 12:35 AM

Sub-c. got mine a few weeks ago, not putting it on until my bday,,,,

Rani Drama · 28 August 2010, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmt master x

Sub-c. got mine a few weeks ago, not putting it on until my bday,,,,

HAHAH Good luck!! I tried saying that when i bought mine. My birthday is in january, then i changed the date to another memorable date, then i just started wearing it!

spuds · 28 August 2010, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rani Drama

HAHAH Good luck!! I tried saying that when i bought mine. My birthday is in january, then i changed the date to another memorable date, then i just started wearing it!

Dr. Robert · 28 August 2010, 01:09 AM

Sub.....to me the milgauss is a "sport" watch but I'm not wild about PCL'c on Rolex's sport watches.

Kokyuryoku · 28 August 2010, 01:13 AM

Sub C all the way

sakuraba · 28 August 2010, 01:18 AM

GV! But only because I already have a Sub (older).

IMHO a Milgauss is not a first/ only Rolex, but a part of a rotation. Anyone considering an only-watch-Rolex would do himself a favor by choosing a Sub.

Dustin · 28 August 2010, 01:19 AM

I'm the proud owner of a Milgauss GV for over a year now. And I'm still enjoying the looks of it. Every single day... but the next thing on my wishlist is the new Sub-C! Man, that thing is awesome!!

TattooedGQ · 28 August 2010, 01:22 AM

IMO....EVERYONE'S going to end up getting the Sub-C. There's been a huge influx here already. Be Different and get a Millie.

Friedl41 · 28 August 2010, 01:22 AM

Sub ... i love my GV Milgauss, but it is not a first/only watch - the Sub is. My 16600 Sd is my all time favorite ... at the moment with a green Nato.

DRAWTOOL · 28 August 2010, 01:22 AM

Millgauss, any style any dial....

nauticajoe · 28 August 2010, 01:24 AM

SubC has my vote.

HORNBLOWER · 28 August 2010, 01:25 AM

Definatly the Sub is the one to choose. I never really got the Milgauss appeal

R1@160@alltimes · 28 August 2010, 01:28 AM

GV since I have 16610 already

Smokeytreats · 28 August 2010, 01:51 AM

Sub is too small imo, the milgauss has the heft and weight that just feels true quality to me. I would opt for the Deepsea if you have larger wrists but that is a whole other animal all together.

fc3s2k · 28 August 2010, 02:24 AM

SUB-C for me!!!

Chipmunk · 28 August 2010, 02:34 AM

I'll get the Sub 16610. Check out the GMTIIC, you might like it. Good luck

want to be · 28 August 2010, 02:41 AM

Love the GV !

Friedl41 · 28 August 2010, 02:56 AM

Get the GMTIIc and make me jeaous ...

eric23 · 28 August 2010, 02:58 AM

Both are nice watches, I would go with the Sub-C, but that is just me!

chris russell · 28 August 2010, 03:07 AM

because the black dial model is far less hokey-looking, imho. The Sub-c is a sports watch, the Milgauss much dressier. I went for both.

kenhiraihnl · 28 August 2010, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

GV! But only because I already have a Sub (older).

IMHO a Milgauss is not a first/ only Rolex, but a part of a rotation. Anyone considering an only-watch-Rolex would do himself a favor by choosing a Sub.

+1...very well said...

Mosco · 28 August 2010, 03:13 AM

No brainer for me, as i don't really like the new sub - plus the pricepoint is ridiculous. Millie - any dial, any crystal.

notaclctr · 28 August 2010, 03:17 AM

neither, I'd buy another daytona

inspires · 28 August 2010, 03:26 AM

Sub-C if you don't already have a Submariner in your collection, but if you do, I would go Milgauss GV

27 August 2010, 10:26 PM	#1
Mtlguy Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Montreal Posts: 56	Which would you rather. The new Sub-C or the Milgauss We all know how popular the Submariner is, but is its styling really that nice compared to some other brands diving watches (Breitling)? If you want to own a Rolex and you don't dive would you consider a nicer styped watch like the Milgauss vs the Sub-C?

27 August 2010, 10:28 PM	#2
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	Sub-C all the way. I don't like not having the date even on a Rolex. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

28 August 2010, 12:35 AM	#7
gmt master x Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: franklin Location: nyc Watch: 70 s gmt master. Posts: 677	Sub-c. got mine a few weeks ago, not putting it on until my bday,,,, Attached Images

28 August 2010, 01:09 AM	#10
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,277	Sub.....to me the milgauss is a "sport" watch but I'm not wild about PCL'c on Rolex's sport watches. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

28 August 2010, 01:13 AM	#11
Kokyuryoku "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Rye Location: Japan Watch: Sundial Posts: 2,156	Sub C all the way __________________ 'The Way of a Warrior is based on humanity, love, and sincerity; the heart of martial valor is true bravery, wisdom, love, and friendship. Emphasis on the physical aspects of warriorship is futile, for the power of the body is always limited'*- Morihei Ueshiba -* Omega 3570.50 (77mil) Rolex 16610 (V) Rolex 1601 (1966) Seiko BM

27 August 2010, 10:29 PM	#3
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	Sub C, I am not a fan of the lightning bolt hand

27 August 2010, 10:31 PM	#4
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	Sub is an iconic Rolex, so that would be a great 1 rolex, even if you dont dive. On the other hand, the Milgauss is a more dressy watch, it is beautiful imo. If you want a dressy rolex, should look into the DJ range (if you must have a date function)

27 August 2010, 10:32 PM	#5
Andrés G "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Guatemala Posts: 3,392	I would rather have a Sub C that any Breitling diver or a Milgauss. Since we´re talking about styling, it comes down to a personal decision.

28 August 2010, 12:26 AM	#6
Mtlguy Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Montreal Posts: 56	Does anyone thin the Green Milgauss look will get "tired" quick?

28 August 2010, 01:18 AM	#12
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	GV! But only because I already have a Sub (older). IMHO a Milgauss is not a first/ only Rolex, but a part of a rotation. Anyone considering an only-watch-Rolex would do himself a favor by choosing a Sub. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

28 August 2010, 01:19 AM	#13
Dustin Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Amsterdam Watch: Milgauss GV Posts: 31	I'm the proud owner of a Milgauss GV for over a year now. And I'm still enjoying the looks of it. Every single day... but the next thing on my wishlist is the new Sub-C! Man, that thing is awesome!!

28 August 2010, 01:22 AM	#14
TattooedGQ "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: NY, USA Watch: yo self! Posts: 2,686	IMO....EVERYONE'S going to end up getting the Sub-C. There's been a huge influx here already. Be Different and get a Millie. __________________ That boy's got the Devil in him. Rolex: I think I'm up to 9?? Omega: Got a few of those too. Breitling: And some of these.

28 August 2010, 01:22 AM	#15
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	Sub ... i love my GV Milgauss, but it is not a first/only watch - the Sub is. My 16600 Sd is my all time favorite ... at the moment with a green Nato.

28 August 2010, 01:24 AM	#17
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	SubC has my vote.

28 August 2010, 01:25 AM	#18
HORNBLOWER "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Ben Location: Ireland Watch: 1 OR 2 Posts: 2,640	sub, every time. Definatly the Sub is the one to choose. I never really got the Milgauss appeal

28 August 2010, 01:28 AM	#19
R1@160@alltimes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: ♛ Posts: 4,408	GV since I have 16610 already __________________

28 August 2010, 01:51 AM	#20
Smokeytreats Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Milgauss White Posts: 155	Sub is too small imo, the milgauss has the heft and weight that just feels true quality to me. I would opt for the Deepsea if you have larger wrists but that is a whole other animal all together.

28 August 2010, 02:24 AM	#21
fc3s2k "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Barry Location: california Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI Posts: 1,289	SUB-C for me!!!

28 August 2010, 02:34 AM	#22
Chipmunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Alvin Location: So Cal Watch: ROLEXES Posts: 5,390	I'll get the Sub 16610. Check out the GMTIIC, you might like it. Good luck __________________ "A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

28 August 2010, 02:41 AM	#23
want to be "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Ft.Lauderedale Posts: 181	Love the GV !

28 August 2010, 02:56 AM	#24
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	Get the GMTIIc and make me jeaous ... __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

28 August 2010, 02:58 AM	#25
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	Both are nice watches, I would go with the Sub-C, but that is just me!

28 August 2010, 03:07 AM	#26
chris russell Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Peterborough, ON Watch: your mouth. Posts: 1,023	If you're me, it's bofum. I notice your post didn't say, 'GV'. Which is good... because the black dial model is far less hokey-looking, imho. The Sub-c is a sports watch, the Milgauss much dressier. I went for both.

28 August 2010, 03:13 AM	#28
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	No brainer for me, as i don't really like the new sub - plus the pricepoint is ridiculous. Millie - any dial, any crystal. __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

28 August 2010, 03:17 AM	#29
notaclctr "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Benelux Watch: smurf Posts: 113	neither, I'd buy another daytona

28 August 2010, 03:26 AM	#30
inspires "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Hong Kong Watch: 1665 Posts: 1,495	Sub-C if you don't already have a Submariner in your collection, but if you do, I would go Milgauss GV __________________ _____________ All GREEN

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)