ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 September 2010, 12:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Joon
Location: San Antonio
Watch: Omega Planet Ocean
Posts: 4
|
Question about the minute had precision 14060m
Question about the minute had precision.
Hi Guys, I have concern about a “new to me” submariner 14060m M serial COSC I recently purchased on TRF. The second had is precise as any other watch I have in my collection gaining nearly 2 seconds in a 24 hour day. I have however noticed that my minute had is not so process. The minute had is first of all hard to set, when I rotate it back for a precise set, the minute hand seems to tighten or bounce a little forward after I remove my fingers from the crown. Once I push the crown in and start the watch, I notice that the minute hand does not hit the minute marker precisely with every full revolution of the second hand. Has anyone else have this issue? |
3 September 2010, 12:33 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
When setting the time with the second hand hacked at 12:00, park the minute hand about 1/4- to 1/3-way past the minute marker you want (in other words, a bit more than you'd think). Don't back up, or you'll have to do it again. Eyeballing the right amount takes a little bit of practice. Once you restart the watch, the minute hand will intercept the next marker exactly 60 seconds later, and will remain aligned with the minute markers for as long as it continues to run. |
|
3 September 2010, 12:40 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Joon
Location: San Antonio
Watch: Omega Planet Ocean
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
|
3 September 2010, 01:18 AM | #4 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
|
It is best to set the time going forwards. You can (obviously) set the time back, but if you do, you tend to get a gap like you have described. The backlash in the gears must be taken up, otherwise you end up with the watch running for 20-30 seconds, without the hand moving.
Hope that helps |
3 September 2010, 01:24 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
You must also recognise that the minute hand is just pointing at one of 60 painted lines around the perimiter of a painted disc... It is not calibrated to be precise or exact around the dial......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 September 2010, 01:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Joon
Location: San Antonio
Watch: Omega Planet Ocean
Posts: 4
|
Thank you guys, it appears that setting the minute moving forward and slightly ahead worked...sigh.
Thanks again everyone. |
3 September 2010, 02:07 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M, 116200
Posts: 318
|
My 14060M has that, too, where the minute hand can be difficult to set. I agree that setting it forward is best. Wind the minute hand back five minutes or so, then more precisely go forward to the mark you want.
|
3 September 2010, 03:03 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Bruce
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 271
|
I have the same problem although it is exagerated with my U-Boat. The drive train backlash is almost a full minute off. Setting the time forward seems to do the trick.
__________________
Collection: Yachtmaster TT, Milgauss, Explorer II, SeaDweller, Air King, Lange #1, BR03-92, Panerai PAM 112, Omega Planet Ocean, Corum Admirals Cup, Ball Engineer, U-boat Flight Deck, Longines Silver Arrow, Hamilton Ventura,etc... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.