ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: GMT2C TT or GMT2C SS | |||
GMT2C TT | 63 | 40.91% | |
GMT2C SS | 91 | 59.09% | |
Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16 September 2010, 06:41 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
If you have to choose between the GMT2C TT and GMT2C SS what will it be?
I own the TT but am curious what you prefer?
Good luck and
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
16 September 2010, 06:44 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I choose and I prefer the SS GMTIIC.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 September 2010, 06:48 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Turkey
Watch: 116610 LN
Posts: 356
|
Anybody can't say SS or TT is the best.
It's a matter of choice. I would prefer SS because I hate yellow gold and a SS Rolex has a better retail price. |
16 September 2010, 06:50 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I prefer the SS in this model
|
16 September 2010, 06:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
I'm with you, Gerardus, but then I am a bit biased
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
16 September 2010, 06:53 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
16 September 2010, 06:54 AM | #7 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,120
|
I'll take the SS one please
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
16 September 2010, 06:55 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
I am feeling fine , thank you.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
16 September 2010, 07:04 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 1,188
|
The GMT2C looks good both ways. My preference, however, is SS.
|
16 September 2010, 08:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
I'm lucky enough to own both, if I had to keep just one it'd be the TT.
Not so long ago my watches had to go in storage & I had to make the choice of which to keep on my wrist. No contest, the TT GMT IIc is a watch for every occasion |
16 September 2010, 08:17 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Ss.
|
16 September 2010, 08:18 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
SS for me - more classic and timeless IMHO.
M |
16 September 2010, 08:18 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,158
|
Not really into TT of any Rolex, but hey, that's just me....
|
16 September 2010, 08:19 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
|
Stainless, but I am biased afterall. I'm just dont like TT on my wrist...
|
16 September 2010, 08:20 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Watch: 16622 YM
Posts: 374
|
Tt
__________________
O.G. TRF member #415 |
16 September 2010, 08:25 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
No gold on a Rolex!
|
16 September 2010, 08:26 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
|
my cousin just mentioned to me he wishes he got the tt model instead of his ss. the price difference to him was only 1500 dollars.
|
16 September 2010, 08:29 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
He could buy a $1500 gold bracelet, with more gold than the Rolex. ;-)
|
16 September 2010, 08:39 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
GMT II C SS for me...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
16 September 2010, 09:06 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Frank
Location: Ventura County
Watch: Omega SeMP Chrono
Posts: 141
|
Stainless steel all they way>>>
I'm not a big fan of TT watches in general and I feel the premium you pay isn't worth it - would rather use the extra $$ that for another watch.
Frank |
16 September 2010, 09:10 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
I have the TT and also like the SS GMTc.
The SS model wasn't available when I bought the TT. If I was making the decision today I would still choose the TT. IMO it is one of the best that Rolex makes.
__________________
E |
16 September 2010, 09:13 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
I prefer SS watches. I own a SS GMT2c
|
16 September 2010, 09:16 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Nice one, Eddie
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
16 September 2010, 09:19 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
|
|
16 September 2010, 09:26 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jeff
Location: arizona
Watch: Seiko 7A28 7049
Posts: 371
|
I usually prefer the SS but to me the TT in this model looks the best IMO
__________________
Submariner 16610 Explorer II 1655 Panerai 915 President of the Royal Commanders Club |
16 September 2010, 09:27 AM | #26 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
|
I would chose the TT,but having already aquired that,the SS is on the list...!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
16 September 2010, 09:35 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
TT sub looks good, but the SS GMT IIc looks fine
|
16 September 2010, 09:42 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
|
|
16 September 2010, 09:58 AM | #29 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
|
Thanks for the agreement!! IMO the GMTc is a superb watch both in looks and function........regardless of what it's made of.!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
16 September 2010, 10:35 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
SS
No Doubt ! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.