ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

B. Doggy · 18 September 2010, 03:01 AM

SUB (16610) or the Daytona (SS white dial)??

dalip · 18 September 2010, 03:03 AM

My lv certainly wears larger

Dr. Robert · 18 September 2010, 03:07 AM

sub wears larger.

mike · 18 September 2010, 03:10 AM

To me the Sub wears larger.

B. Doggy · 18 September 2010, 03:32 AM

Interesting....thanks fellas!

rfknauss · 18 September 2010, 05:02 AM

Submariners!

esm · 18 September 2010, 06:08 AM

16610 wears larger, but the 116520 is not a small watch at all

ayres · 18 September 2010, 06:10 AM

larger case back and clasp on the sub

Renoir · 18 September 2010, 06:11 AM

Also, the rotating bezel on the Sub makes a difference.

train-time · 18 September 2010, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

SUB (16610) or the Daytona (SS white dial)??

Definately the Sub and it feels much lighter on the wrist. The Daytona is very well balanced, but heavier than the Sub (solid bracelet and machined clasp, not to mention chronograph head). The Daytona is the most comfortable watch I have ever worn!

esm · 18 September 2010, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayres

larger case back and clasp on the sub

imo - the new clasp on 116520 wears "bigger" than the 16610 fliplock clasp

Gerardus · 18 September 2010, 06:34 AM

Yes the SUB.

egzbuen · 18 September 2010, 01:13 PM

Agree with all, the 16610 wears larger than the Daytona.

ersnyder · 18 September 2010, 01:15 PM

No doubt in my mind, the Sub!

dddrees · 18 September 2010, 06:41 PM

The Daytona does appear to wear a bit smaller. My Daytona definitely wears smaller than my GMTIIC.

travisb · 18 September 2010, 06:47 PM

I've had both and the Daytona has a more sleek, low profile appearance on the wrist. The Sub sits a liitle higher and wears bigger IMO

Shade · 18 September 2010, 09:12 PM

The sub wears larger..

fc3s2k · 19 September 2010, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renoir

Also, the rotating bezel on the Sub makes a difference.

X2

InVision · 19 September 2010, 01:06 AM

Sub wears larger, the daytona wear better and more comfortable IMHO.

Mike

Art 1 · 19 September 2010, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InVision

Sub wears larger, the daytona wear better and more comfortable IMHO.

Mike

+1. The Daytona is sooo much more comfy.

dannyp · 19 September 2010, 04:05 AM

I find that the larger the dial to bezel ratio, the larger the watch wears. My IWC MK XVI wears larger than my Rolex Exp. II even though it's 1mm smaller because there's no real bezel, the dial goes all the way to the edge. With the Sub, the bezel is essentially an extension of the dial, as both are black, while the Daytona has the distinctly different colored bezel. Also, the bezel on the Sub sits a bit higher, since it rotates. The recessed bezel is one of my favorite features on my Exp, because the watch wears a tiny bit smaller.

18 September 2010, 03:01 AM	#1
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Which One Wears Larger? SUB (16610) or the Daytona (SS white dial)?? __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

18 September 2010, 03:03 AM	#2
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	My lv certainly wears larger __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

18 September 2010, 03:07 AM	#3
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,288	sub wears larger. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

18 September 2010, 03:32 AM	#5
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Interesting....thanks fellas! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

18 September 2010, 05:02 AM	#6
rfknauss 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Richard Location: Macungie, PA Watch: 5513 Sub, LV Sub Posts: 14,497	Submariners! __________________ *"Few things in life give man as great a pleasure as wearing a Rolex!"* TRF's "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron

18 September 2010, 03:10 AM	#4
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	To me the Sub wears larger.

18 September 2010, 06:08 AM	#7
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	16610 wears larger, but the 116520 is not a small watch at all

18 September 2010, 06:10 AM	#8
ayres "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: honolulu Watch: whatever runs Posts: 551	larger case back and clasp on the sub

18 September 2010, 06:11 AM	#9
Renoir "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Renato Location: New York Posts: 2,396	Also, the rotating bezel on the Sub makes a difference.

18 September 2010, 06:34 AM	#12
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	Yes the SUB. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

18 September 2010, 01:13 PM	#13
egzbuen "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Manila Posts: 1,177	Agree with all, the 16610 wears larger than the Daytona. __________________ 18083 & 16750 16234 & 16233 16610 & 16800 3717-01 & 104 & 312 Nav B-Uhr

18 September 2010, 01:15 PM	#14
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	No doubt in my mind, the Sub!

18 September 2010, 06:41 PM	#15
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	The Daytona does appear to wear a bit smaller. My Daytona definitely wears smaller than my GMTIIC. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

18 September 2010, 06:47 PM	#16
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Sub.. I've had both and the Daytona has a more sleek, low profile appearance on the wrist. The Sub sits a liitle higher and wears bigger IMO

18 September 2010, 09:12 PM	#17
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	The sub wears larger..

19 September 2010, 01:06 AM	#19
InVision Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Destin, FL USA Watch: Outerspace DayDate Posts: 2,662	Sub wears larger, the daytona wear better and more comfortable IMHO. Mike

19 September 2010, 04:05 AM	#21
dannyp Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: usa Posts: 6,765	I find that the larger the dial to bezel ratio, the larger the watch wears. My IWC MK XVI wears larger than my Rolex Exp. II even though it's 1mm smaller because there's no real bezel, the dial goes all the way to the edge. With the Sub, the bezel is essentially an extension of the dial, as both are black, while the Daytona has the distinctly different colored bezel. Also, the bezel on the Sub sits a bit higher, since it rotates. The recessed bezel is one of my favorite features on my Exp, because the watch wears a tiny bit smaller.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)