The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 March 2007, 10:50 PM   #1
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Anyone Else "Somewhat" Allergic to Rolex SS?

Here's a my conclusion until recently after "extended" wear of my SS Rolex's my wrist would always start to irritate nothing major just somewhat uncomfortable , would never be able to wear it overnight or 24/7, I'm of the understanding Rolex uses SS 904L with a relatively high nickle content [which improves the lustre /etc of the finish. Now since getting my white gold daytona which is a palladium white gold [no nickle] and also my alpha which i'm guessing uses a cheaper? SS steel [lower nickle content?] i can wear my watches literally 24/7 with "great"!!!!! comfort!!!

Steve
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2007, 11:18 PM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Well myself have never had a problem but according Quote from Rolex employee back in 2002.At the moment, we have several companies all over the world, serving our needs for stainless steel. The watch case backs and bracelets are all made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 which is the best compromise between the attributes of the variant materials. As usual, the steel is melted under vacuum, so we get an very pure base, which is easy to handle and allows an perfect polishing. I think, the same procedure as in every good gold company.

Now X2CrNiMo17-12-2 is the code for 316L S.steel.

Now (904L is more hype than anything, Not unusual for Rolex) And as far as I am aware only certain parts like pins,case ring.bezel of your Rolex are 904L the rest according to that Rolex employee the more commonly used 316L.But would doubt if Rolex would say that because 904L,is approx 3 times more expensive than the more commonly used 316L,and we all know expensive is always better.And looking at it from another side of the coin would have thought there would have been the warning,about the high nickel content.Very similar to today in the UK warning about a packet of peanuts (warning) contains nuts.Especially in todays sue for anything, and health and safety political correct age
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 12:07 AM   #3
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
No, I have not had any form of discomfort with the new 904L.
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 02:16 AM   #4
cbrenthus
"TRF" Member
 
cbrenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
I don't know about the SS, but when I tried on a WG Daytona I started having heart palpatations, shortness of breath, and heavy sweating. I'm not sure if I was allergic to it or if it was just an acute case of severe Rolexitis.
cbrenthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 02:51 AM   #5
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
I have noticed a slight itch from where the clasp meets the bottom of my wrist, But I never thought it would be the watch since I wear it a little loose.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 03:14 AM   #6
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,968
My SS GMT does not bother me at all. It's one of the most comfortable watches I wear. I don't wear any watch 24/7 most of the time, but I normally wear mine about 18 hours/day with no discomfort.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 03:16 AM   #7
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
Don't have any issues with my old 14060 nor with the current 16600 SD.
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 04:17 AM   #8
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
The day my Rollies start doing all that nonsense to me, I'll kill them both, then myself and ask my wife to bury the 3 of us together!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2007, 11:19 PM   #9
Erix
"TRF" Member
 
Erix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nice, France
Watch: D Sub date 16610
Posts: 929
No problem for me, I usually wear my sub on a nato.
Erix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2007, 01:41 AM   #10
tonelar
"TRF" Member
 
tonelar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Tony
Location: san francisco
Watch: Seadweller
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erix View Post
No problem for me, I usually wear my sub on a nato.
__________________
It's a rarity that something popular is actually right...

Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all.
tonelar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2007, 03:37 AM   #11
oldbreadstinks
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sg
Posts: 568
one of my friends wear leather straps with all his watches because he's allegic to nickel, he wanted to get a SS DJ but couldn't because he can't wear stainless steel
oldbreadstinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2007, 09:26 PM   #12
shoppy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Watch: OP and daytona
Posts: 1,783
I get a strange feeling form wearing my leather strapped daytona. The only problem I have had with SS bracelets is nipping at the hair on my wrist.
shoppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2007, 10:01 PM   #13
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
Sometimes I do get a slight tingling, no rash, but it is there. Mainly when heavy sweating. The salt from sweat will react with the 904 and cause a nickel discharge. Talked with 2 RSC reps, and yes it occasionally is problem with those who are allergic to Nickel. Some have even broken out in rashes or had other symptoms. The nickel content in 904 SS is about 25% higher. As I posted in another post, due to new EU regulations, Rolex will probably be having to switch over to 316 pretty soon. As far as watches go, I see no significant benefit that 904 has over 316. I do know from my expereinces that 316 does seem to wear more comfortable.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2007, 10:09 PM   #14
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoppy View Post
I get a strange feeling form wearing my leather strapped daytona. The only problem I have had with SS bracelets is nipping at the hair on my wrist.
I have never had any allergy to steel, but in fact I DO have chrome allergy (to a mild extend), so that I cannot wear leather bands because some are treated with chrome in the manufacturing process.

__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2007, 10:31 PM   #15
shoppy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Watch: OP and daytona
Posts: 1,783
Thanks for the info Bo,
shoppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2007, 10:33 PM   #16
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
I find absolutely no problems with my skin v. 904L in any circumstance like cold or hot weather, humid, arid, rain, mud and sand and seawater many times.

I would suggest that those who are 'allergic' to this metal in Rolex bracelet must be in a very small minority.

Rolex 904L steel has properties surpassing 316 and it has a lustre of its own. I doubt very much if Rolex will go to 316 steel. It would be a mistake IMHO.

Here's about 904L:

http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1022
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2007, 11:30 AM   #17
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
I have seen some pics here on TRF showing some significant corrosion where the caseback meets the case after 15-20 years. Maybe from Hacko?

904L is more corrosion resistant and I'm wondering if the 904 would hold up better than the 316 in this regard. I wish I had saved the pics. I think they were from a vintage piece he was restoring.

The 904 is used for extreme circumstances in the chemical industry and I'm thinking it would hold up better after 20-30 plus years of sweat, grime etc. that the average person might put it through.

I have no problem with the high Nickel content in the 904 and have yet to see anyone here who has had a significant issue with it as far as affecting the skin.

I have to say the luster/color of the 904 is one of the things that really makes me love my SD.
Letsgodiving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2007, 11:42 AM   #18
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514


I've never had an issue with Rolex SS.
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2007, 03:48 PM   #19
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
I have seen some pics here on TRF showing some significant corrosion where the caseback meets the case after 15-20 years. Maybe from Hacko?

Maybe the pics were taken of a watch that wasn't 904L? 15-20 years back, might have been 316L or some other. Who knows with H

Steve
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2007, 07:28 AM   #20
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
Never had an issue and it is never off my wrist.

f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.