do you guys no this dealer on ebay??

[icemics]

ROLEX 18K DAYTONA "PAUL NEWMAN" MODEL 6264 CIRCA 1969


do you guys no this dealer? and is it real..

http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-18K-DAYTON...item3f0413b5b5

[Lol-x]

The seller seems to have some mixed results.

With a watch like this you should be 100% confident on all aspects.

The Paul Newman Daytonas sold on the used market are known for having imitation dials.

The photographs provided by the seller are unacceptable for a watch of that value. The white markings on the sub-dials look too new to me which suggests a possible re-dial.

The seller does not warrant the watch as being 100% factory original.

I don't get how a seller can try and sell a $5,000 watch let alone a $110,000 watch with a handful of blurry photographs.

Be careful.

[Wolfgang427]

Stevo's correct even with professional pics I wouldn't buy a watch in that price range without inspecting it in person.

[Lol-x]

Also it looks like there is some damage near the 1 O'Clock mark on the bezel.

Yeah, I agree, inspect in person, the seller should be showing photos of the movement, inside the caseback, and close up and detailed photographs of the dial.

A seller with 500 feedbacks who posts photographs like he does, should put you on notice right from the get go!

[Route 66]

If I could afford to purchase a $110,000 watch, it wouldn't be through Ebay. I'd fly to the seller's location to inspect it in person.

[TimeToGo]

Originally Posted by stevarn

if i could afford to purchase a $110,000 watch, it wouldn't be through ebay. I'd fly to the seller's location to inspect it in person.

x2!

[Grissom]

Originally Posted by Stevarn

If I could afford to purchase a $110,000 watch, it wouldn't be through Ebay. I'd fly to the seller's location to inspect it in person.

x3!

[Michael M.]

Originally Posted by stevarn

if i could afford to purchase a $110,000 watch, it wouldn't be through ebay. I'd fly to the seller's location to inspect it in person.

x4!

[Frogman4me]

Anything over 10k I'm flying and inspecting it myself. Too much money for photos alone.

[DoubleRedRolex]

IS the case supposed to be 14k? I thought these were 18k? Any why does it have a cheap gold plaque buckle on a $110k watch???


Lonnie

[rmfnla]

Originally Posted by DoubleRedRolex

IS the case supposed to be 14k? I thought these were 18k? Any why does it have a cheap gold plaque buckle on a $110k watch???
Lonnie

My thought exactly!

[G.D.BeanCounter]

For that kind of money... Road trip!!!
Face-to-face with qualified RSC/ Appraiser riding shot-gun

[RLXSTR]

Hmmm...seems the Model # and year do not match. I do not understand why someone would post such horrible photos of such a wonderful watch. It deserves to be photographed professionally especially with that kind of price tag. It is way over priced, as it's on a leather strap and an gold plated buckle. At one time, I'm sure this had an 18K Oyster riveted bracelet.

[MonBK]

Not good.