ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 December 2010, 05:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
Something you don't see everyday.
|
5 December 2010, 06:55 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
Looks good but not fussed on straps,prefer bracelets. Not cheap either !
|
5 December 2010, 08:24 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
I agree. Bracelets all the way for me. Seems to be a lot of people chasing a 6263 but this could be rarer.
|
5 December 2010, 10:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
Interesting, if this is a 6265, shouldn't it say DAYTONA above the chrono @ 6, not COSMOGRAPH? Maybe the "6265/8" has something to do with it? I'm no sure what a 6268 is, but the caseback has 6265 stamped on it.
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
5 December 2010, 10:36 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I prefer bracelets over leather bands...
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
5 December 2010, 01:20 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
It looks so good!!
|
5 December 2010, 01:23 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Looks really cool, I love gold 6265's! It's pretty expensive for one that doesnt have the bracelet.
|
5 December 2010, 01:23 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ritchie
Location: Angola
Watch: RExpI
Posts: 145
|
Handsome watch, thanks for sharing.....
|
5 December 2010, 01:31 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
Very nice watch--Personally-I would take a 6263 over it as I love the black bezel look far more!! A wonderful Christmas gift-a gold 6263 on bracelet though!!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
7 December 2010, 02:07 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
Beautiful!!
|
7 December 2010, 02:19 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Bozeman, MT
Watch: 126508 Paul Newman
Posts: 7,835
|
It is stunning but I am with the majority and would prefer it on a bracelet instead of a leather strap. The leather strap doesn't look like it fits the watch properly.
|
7 December 2010, 02:36 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
7 December 2010, 02:37 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Beautiful...............and I like it a lot on the strap, a diiferent look.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.