ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 December 2010, 10:53 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
My next Rolex - modern or vintage?
Hi All
While I am not planning on buying another Rolex for a little while I have already begun considering what it might be. I have a Submariner (16610) and a GMT-Master II, which I am both extremely happy with. I love the vintage Submariner 5513 but am also tempted for the new Submariner with the ceramic bezel. Owning either would be a delight. So the question is which way would members go - vintage or modern? M |
11 December 2010, 10:54 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,007
|
Vintage for me Mark!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
11 December 2010, 11:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Vintage is a lot if work IMO. But if you get lucky, hey go for it!
|
11 December 2010, 12:03 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Vintage.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
11 December 2010, 12:52 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NE
Posts: 421
|
Vintage - anyone can buy a new rolex - a vintage watch has far more personality.
|
11 December 2010, 01:13 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Roger
Location: Toronto
Posts: 604
|
I got a sense that you will eventually get both, it is just a matter of which one comes along first with the price and condition you desire. Naturally, when the right 5513 shows up, don't pass it up.
|
11 December 2010, 01:19 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
Vintage-1680 for me.
|
11 December 2010, 01:29 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
Vintage!!!! How can you go wrong with something as beautiful as this:
|
11 December 2010, 01:35 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,007
|
That is what I am talking about!!! Nice Sub Yazo!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
11 December 2010, 01:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
|
11 December 2010, 02:28 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 43
|
Vintage definitely. You've already got the new. Buying vintage may be a little more difficult and takes more patience, as long as you remember- buy the dealer, not the watch...you'll do fine.
|
11 December 2010, 06:18 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Well,....
|
11 December 2010, 11:57 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
Cheers guys, your comments are greatly appreciated
Now that Mike has posted that photo of a gorgeous vintage Sub I think I have made my decision! M |
12 December 2010, 03:39 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 999
|
Good choice, vintage watches are so much more special IMO. Just know that once you go vintage you will definitely get the sickness.
|
12 December 2010, 03:43 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Or, maybe a date??
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.