ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

LordNinja · 12 February 2011, 04:33 PM

I have a 16610 (F serial) and a 16613 (K serial) I just picked up. I noticed the metal (SS) on the TT seems to be a different hue? I at first thought it was the finishing, but it seems the metal is different? Not sure if the pics will help but does anyone else own both watches that can compare? Did they use different metals for TT for effect?

The bracelet end codes match up and so forth. Weight is fine.. I was thinking of having it refinished by a pro but first I wanted to see what you guys thought:)

Thanks for any input in advance!

LordNinja · 12 February 2011, 04:57 PM

Browsing around the forums looking at 16613 it starting to seem normal. I wonder if it has to do with people polishing the gold links and over polishing the brushed? *shrug*

Sub'erman · 13 February 2011, 01:47 AM

Looking at the Rolex site pix the steel on the GS Sub looks like titanium compared to the old model... Same thing with the SS Sub.

MonBK · 13 February 2011, 01:56 AM

Lighting.

glocati · 13 February 2011, 02:40 AM

Chris, i think you are right. I think it a finish/polishing difference is all. Should be the same grade SS in both watches.

LordNinja · 13 February 2011, 03:54 AM

Thanks for the input guys, I was thinking about a 86 datejust I owned and some of the links that were over polished started to look similar.

12 February 2011, 04:33 PM	#1
LordNinja "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: Boston Watch: 116610,116233,OsQz Posts: 1,109	Metal color question, 16613/16610 I have a 16610 (F serial) and a 16613 (K serial) I just picked up. I noticed the metal (SS) on the TT seems to be a different hue? I at first thought it was the finishing, but it seems the metal is different? Not sure if the pics will help but does anyone else own both watches that can compare? Did they use different metals for TT for effect? The bracelet end codes match up and so forth. Weight is fine.. I was thinking of having it refinished by a pro but first I wanted to see what you guys thought:) Thanks for any input in advance! Attached Images

13 February 2011, 01:47 AM	#3
Sub'erman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: SK Location: Greenland Watch: Various SUBs Posts: 473	Looking at the Rolex site pix the steel on the GS Sub looks like titanium compared to the old model... Same thing with the SS Sub. __________________ Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!! He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!! "Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable"

12 February 2011, 04:57 PM	#2
LordNinja "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: Boston Watch: 116610,116233,OsQz Posts: 1,109	Browsing around the forums looking at 16613 it starting to seem normal. I wonder if it has to do with people polishing the gold links and over polishing the brushed? shrug

13 February 2011, 01:56 AM	#4
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	Lighting.

13 February 2011, 02:40 AM	#5
glocati "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Greg Location: Portland, Oregon Watch: 1675/3+16013 Posts: 538	Chris, i think you are right. I think it a finish/polishing difference is all. Should be the same grade SS in both watches.

13 February 2011, 03:54 AM	#6
LordNinja "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: Boston Watch: 116610,116233,OsQz Posts: 1,109	Thanks for the input guys, I was thinking about a 86 datejust I owned and some of the links that were over polished started to look similar.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)