ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

buddy13 · 13 February 2011, 02:29 AM

Only one week after buying my first Rolex, see post here:

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=163309

I am already thinking of moving on to my second :oops: ...I mean the 16610 is truly a very nice watch but I have become accustomed to large watches in the 42-45mm range and every time I put the 16610 on my wrist I dont feel too impressed...I am very aware that quality and weight are not proportional in any way...but I think I want more heft :bounce:..

So I am ehmmm..looking at trading the 16610 for a DSSD :shock: ...has anyone here made the switch? Do you think it is worthwhile? I am asking for your opinion cause a LNIB 16610 is not going to be very easy to replace a short time for now :( ...and I cant keep both for 4 reasons:

1) I have self limited my collection to around 6 watches so need to move one to buy another
2) I might not have the budget for 2 expensive Rollies
3) My girlfriend will kill me...
4) My girlfriend will kill me...

In my eyes, apart from the obvious size difference there are a few advantages to it which I think I really like (I only listed those which interest me..for example 3900m vs 300m WR rating is not important to me):

- Larger markers and hands
- Better lume
- Better clasp
- Upgraded movement

Thanks for any help and opinions...

darthmouse · 13 February 2011, 02:37 AM

I would not trade a 16610 for a DSSD, but if you really would prefer the weight and size, then go for it.

ersnyder · 13 February 2011, 02:39 AM

Personally not a big fan of the DSSD (and I do like big watches) but if you like it, go for it! And, yes, like the rest of us you are kinda crazy.

esm · 13 February 2011, 02:41 AM

I can see a big problem already - it's time for a new girlfriend

In all seriousness, if you like it, go fir it. Be your own boss.

Btw - it's not crazy, it is quite common amongst us watch nuts

SaddleSC · 13 February 2011, 02:52 AM

I would NOT make the trade. I personally love the DSSD and it is certainly an engineering tour de force, but it is more of a specialty watch and I don't think that it is anywhere near as versatile as a classic 16610. Combine that with the fact that the 16610 has been recently discontinued, it will be much harder to replace.

wokafu · 13 February 2011, 03:08 AM

16610 is a classic....keep it...

HL65 · 13 February 2011, 03:09 AM

Keep it and buy the DSSD! Be like the rest of us--super carazy!! Welcome to RolexWorld!!

buddy13 · 13 February 2011, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan1965

Keep it and buy the DSSD! Be like the rest of us--super carazy!! Welcome to RolexWorld!!

Hehe...that is the best choice I suppose

...

Tunacan26 · 13 February 2011, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddy13

Hehe...that is the best choice I suppose

...

No brainer, only way to go.

mike · 13 February 2011, 03:49 AM

Well,...I can't address the girlfriend issue, I have enough trouble with the wife issue.

Here's something to consider though.

You have a collection of six watches. How well or in what capacity does a watch the size of the DSSD fit?

As you say, your preference is in the 42-45MM range. The DSSD fits there. I agree with all you have stated about the DS with the addition of a true 60minute insert. One has to go to the rarified atmosphere of the Mil. Sub. to have that capability---the girlfriend/wife issue comes up here.

While it's certainly true they don't make the 16610 anymore it's not a hard one to find.

The main issue that seems to arise with the DS is one of thickness and here, again, I have to get back to "how would it fit" in a collection of six watches.

Personally I could build a pretty strong case that such a speciality piece would blend quite well in a collection of that size.

mike · 13 February 2011, 03:51 AM

Oh,...I almost forgot. The "officially crazy" thing.....yes you are! The warmest of welcomes to the club.

L-16610 · 13 February 2011, 03:53 AM

you're crazy

Join us in the madhouse LOL

mtrunner · 13 February 2011, 03:55 AM

I would definitely try the DSSD on first before buying it if you haven't done so already. It is huge compared to the 16610. I have tried it on and it is just not comfortable. Also the watch sits extremely high on the wrist. I would stick with the 16610.

DCgator · 13 February 2011, 04:08 AM

Go Deep I say. The Deepsea is unique, new, and a dynamic watch!

buddy13 · 13 February 2011, 04:10 AM

The irony lies here

...

I tried DSSD on a couple times when in London last November. I was sure it was not for me due to its thickness and it's writing on that (somewhat uneeded) ring in the case...

So I completely dismissed it when on the search for my first Rolex

..

Now I feel myself strangely attracted to it...also as someone pointed out I miss the full minute markers on the bezel as so..

BarkMaster · 13 February 2011, 04:14 AM

If you don't like the 16610, then you'll find yourself wering other watches from your (wall clock sized!

) collection, so I say go with what you want... because THAT is what you'll want to wear.

johnbeth · 13 February 2011, 04:32 AM

I would not trade. The more Rolex watches u have the better!

Gerardus · 13 February 2011, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ersnyder

Personally not a big fan of the DSSD (and I do like big watches) but if you like it, go for it! And, yes, like the rest of us you are kinda crazy.

same for me

BarkMaster · 13 February 2011, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerardus

same for me

Listen to the man... he wears bark.

buddy13 · 13 February 2011, 05:30 AM

thanks guys for all your replies...

I think I'll keep it for a few weeks and see from there. It is no pain at all keeping the 16610

B. Doggy · 13 February 2011, 06:31 AM

I wouldn't...

Atomant · 13 February 2011, 12:18 PM

IMO if I were to look for a bigger watch I would look elsewhere. Anything bigger than a 40mm for a sport Rolex is too huge. To each his own I guess.

sea-dweller · 13 February 2011, 12:38 PM

Keep the 16610 and buy the DSSD later.

general · 13 February 2011, 01:09 PM

the Sub is an all around every day watch. The DSSD is more of a specialty tool watch. I agree with sea-deweller's suggestion. BTW, you ate not crazy. I have been wanting to buy another Rollie as soon as I bought my 1st one.

Launch Mini · 13 February 2011, 01:21 PM

I too tend t wear the larger watches. What I found with the 16610 wasn't it's physical size but the smaller markers and hands. This made the watch look smaller IMO. The maxi dial makes the LV appear larger

dddrees · 13 February 2011, 01:29 PM

Do what you think is right.

You are in good company here, we are all a bunch of watch nuts here.

Xpert37 · 13 February 2011, 02:21 PM

You should not give up the 16610 so easily - it is a timeless classic worthy of passing down to your children (whether they are with your GF or not). :-)

13 February 2011, 02:29 AM	#1
buddy13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Etienne Location: Malta Watch: Orient star 300m Posts: 724	OK..I think I'm officially crazy.. Only one week after buying my first Rolex, see post here: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=163309 I am already thinking of moving on to my second :oops: ...I mean the 16610 is truly a very nice watch but I have become accustomed to large watches in the 42-45mm range and every time I put the 16610 on my wrist I dont feel too impressed...I am very aware that quality and weight are not proportional in any way...but I think I want more heft :bounce:.. So I am ehmmm..looking at trading the 16610 for a DSSD :shock: ...has anyone here made the switch? Do you think it is worthwhile? I am asking for your opinion cause a LNIB 16610 is not going to be very easy to replace a short time for now :( ...and I cant keep both for 4 reasons: 1) I have self limited my collection to around 6 watches so need to move one to buy another 2) I might not have the budget for 2 expensive Rollies 3) My girlfriend will kill me... 4) My girlfriend will kill me... In my eyes, apart from the obvious size difference there are a few advantages to it which I think I really like (I only listed those which interest me..for example 3900m vs 300m WR rating is not important to me): - Larger markers and hands - Better lume - Better clasp - Upgraded movement Thanks for any help and opinions...

13 February 2011, 02:52 AM	#5
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	I would NOT make the trade. I personally love the DSSD and it is certainly an engineering tour de force, but it is more of a specialty watch and I don't think that it is anywhere near as versatile as a classic 16610. Combine that with the fact that the 16610 has been recently discontinued, it will be much harder to replace. __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

13 February 2011, 03:09 AM	#7
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,008	Keep it and buy the DSSD! Be like the rest of us--super carazy!! Welcome to RolexWorld!! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

13 February 2011, 04:10 AM	#15
buddy13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Etienne Location: Malta Watch: Orient star 300m Posts: 724	Thanks for your replies mates ;-)... The irony lies here ... I tried DSSD on a couple times when in London last November. I was sure it was not for me due to its thickness and it's writing on that (somewhat uneeded) ring in the case... So I completely dismissed it when on the search for my first Rolex .. Now I feel myself strangely attracted to it...also as someone pointed out I miss the full minute markers on the bezel as so..

13 February 2011, 04:14 AM	#16
BarkMaster "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Texas Watch: 18078 YG DD Posts: 7,962	If you don't like the 16610, then you'll find yourself wering other watches from your (wall clock sized! ) collection, so I say go with what you want... because THAT is what you'll want to wear. __________________ BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK

13 February 2011, 02:37 AM	#2
darthmouse "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: EC/Midwest Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,016	I would not trade a 16610 for a DSSD, but if you really would prefer the weight and size, then go for it.

13 February 2011, 02:39 AM	#3
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	Personally not a big fan of the DSSD (and I do like big watches) but if you like it, go for it! And, yes, like the rest of us you are kinda crazy.

13 February 2011, 02:41 AM	#4
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	I can see a big problem already - it's time for a new girlfriend In all seriousness, if you like it, go fir it. Be your own boss. Btw - it's not crazy, it is quite common amongst us watch nuts

13 February 2011, 03:08 AM	#6
wokafu "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Malaysia Watch: SM300+14060M Posts: 2,012	16610 is a classic....keep it...

13 February 2011, 03:49 AM	#10
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Well,...I can't address the girlfriend issue, I have enough trouble with the wife issue. Here's something to consider though. You have a collection of six watches. How well or in what capacity does a watch the size of the DSSD fit? As you say, your preference is in the 42-45MM range. The DSSD fits there. I agree with all you have stated about the DS with the addition of a true 60minute insert. One has to go to the rarified atmosphere of the Mil. Sub. to have that capability---the girlfriend/wife issue comes up here. While it's certainly true they don't make the 16610 anymore it's not a hard one to find. The main issue that seems to arise with the DS is one of thickness and here, again, I have to get back to "how would it fit" in a collection of six watches. Personally I could build a pretty strong case that such a speciality piece would blend quite well in a collection of that size.

13 February 2011, 03:51 AM	#11
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Oh,...I almost forgot. The "officially crazy" thing.....yes you are! The warmest of welcomes to the club.

13 February 2011, 03:53 AM	#12
L-16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Europe Posts: 825	you're crazy Join us in the madhouse LOL

13 February 2011, 03:55 AM	#13
mtrunner 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Gary Location: Bozeman, MT Watch: 126508 Paul Newman Posts: 7,835	I would definitely try the DSSD on first before buying it if you haven't done so already. It is huge compared to the 16610. I have tried it on and it is just not comfortable. Also the watch sits extremely high on the wrist. I would stick with the 16610.

13 February 2011, 04:08 AM	#14
DCgator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: PNW Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2 Posts: 8,123	Go Deep I say. The Deepsea is unique, new, and a dynamic watch!

13 February 2011, 04:32 AM	#17
johnbeth "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Depends on mood. Posts: 9,536	I would not trade. The more Rolex watches u have the better!

13 February 2011, 05:30 AM	#20
buddy13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Etienne Location: Malta Watch: Orient star 300m Posts: 724	thanks guys for all your replies... I think I'll keep it for a few weeks and see from there. It is no pain at all keeping the 16610

13 February 2011, 06:31 AM	#21
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	I wouldn't... __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

13 February 2011, 12:18 PM	#22
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	IMO if I were to look for a bigger watch I would look elsewhere. Anything bigger than a 40mm for a sport Rolex is too huge. To each his own I guess. __________________ 116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80

13 February 2011, 12:38 PM	#23
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Keep the 16610 and buy the DSSD later. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

13 February 2011, 01:09 PM	#24
general "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Earth Posts: 723	the Sub is an all around every day watch. The DSSD is more of a specialty tool watch. I agree with sea-deweller's suggestion. BTW, you ate not crazy. I have been wanting to buy another Rollie as soon as I bought my 1st one.

13 February 2011, 01:21 PM	#25
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	I too tend t wear the larger watches. What I found with the 16610 wasn't it's physical size but the smaller markers and hands. This made the watch look smaller IMO. The maxi dial makes the LV appear larger __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

13 February 2011, 01:29 PM	#26
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	Do what you think is right. You are in good company here, we are all a bunch of watch nuts here. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

13 February 2011, 02:21 PM	#27
Xpert37 Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Eli Location: Long Island Watch: 16610 Posts: 117	You should not give up the 16610 so easily - it is a timeless classic worthy of passing down to your children (whether they are with your GF or not). :-)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)