ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex116520 · 15 April 2011, 11:03 PM

Is this right ? 5513 with white gold surround markers ? To fit a 1520 movement ?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...fvi%3D1&_rdc=1

MonBK · 16 April 2011, 06:57 AM

Can't put my finger on it but something is not right?

mcjp6 · 16 April 2011, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex116520

Is this right ? 5513 with white gold surround markers ? To fit a 1520 movement ?

I believe the dial shown is good.....

Certainly the last run of 5513s had wg surrounds and gloss dials. One of my 5513s shown here for comparison

MonBK · 16 April 2011, 10:47 AM

In that case I stand corrected.

I just got the wrong feeling about this seller when I saw he previously bought this:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=280640769056

SkyKing31 · 16 April 2011, 12:12 PM

Isnt the price a bit high?

Rolex116520 · 16 April 2011, 03:39 PM

WOW ! Great looking watch Michael

So , W/G surrounds on that dial are OK . Learned something again . Thank you .

The $350 price tag would be for that " stunning effect of the spider web " .. not that I can see the spiderweb on that dial from that photo

Rolex116520 · 20 April 2011, 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyKing31

Isnt the price a bit high?

When you see he paid exactly the same for some blank documents .. he's only trying to get his money back .

onryo · 22 April 2011, 03:24 AM

Looks fine to me. It is either a post-1983 (WG surrounds started in the 8.4 million range) original dial or a late 80s service dial.

15 April 2011, 11:03 PM	#1
Rolex116520 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: EEC Watch: Daytona & Deepsea Posts: 2,387	Authentic Rolex Submariner dial W/G Ref 5513 1984-1990 Is this right ? 5513 with white gold surround markers ? To fit a 1520 movement ? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...fvi%3D1&_rdc=1 Attached Images __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

16 April 2011, 03:39 PM	#6
Rolex116520 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: EEC Watch: Daytona & Deepsea Posts: 2,387	WOW ! Great looking watch Michael So , W/G surrounds on that dial are OK . Learned something again . Thank you . The $350 price tag would be for that " stunning effect of the spider web " .. not that I can see the spiderweb on that dial from that photo __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

16 April 2011, 06:57 AM	#2
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	Can't put my finger on it but something is not right?

16 April 2011, 10:47 AM	#4
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	In that case I stand corrected. I just got the wrong feeling about this seller when I saw he previously bought this: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=280640769056

16 April 2011, 12:12 PM	#5
SkyKing31 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Manalapan Florida Watch: Tridor Masterpiece Posts: 2,819	Isnt the price a bit high?

22 April 2011, 03:24 AM	#8
onryo Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Seattle Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 410	Looks fine to me. It is either a post-1983 (WG surrounds started in the 8.4 million range) original dial or a late 80s service dial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)