ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

α-ψ! · 8 July 2011, 04:24 AM

I was thinking to give my 2 month logo to have a 104!I would like to have your opinions about it!!

ocwatching · 8 July 2011, 04:38 AM

The logo is pretty sweet but if you are looking for an automatic with date, I would do trade for a 312.
Just my two cents...

fc3s2k · 8 July 2011, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocwatching

The logo is pretty sweet but if you are looking for an automatic with date, I would do trade for a 312.
Just my two cents...

X2

Not a fan of the cyclops on a Panerai. 312 gets my vote!!!

esm · 8 July 2011, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fc3s2k

X2

Not a fan of the cyclops on a Panerai. 312 gets my vote!!!

That's would I would go with too.
Cyclops is Rolex IMO

I think a 1950 case would be a "better" & "worthy" upgrade too

dddrees · 8 July 2011, 05:23 AM

Constant flipping can become pretty expensive and its always easy to find something you don't already have. As long as you aren't losing to much and it's what you really want...................

mfer · 8 July 2011, 07:17 AM

Keep the zero. What is the problem with it?

α-ψ! · 8 July 2011, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Keep the zero. What is the problem with it?

Only that it's not automatic!!!

MDUB · 8 July 2011, 08:18 AM

I agree with Mik. 312 is nice, but you can save for it and get one LNIB for a decent deal when you are ready and they seem to be more readily available than the 0.

karmatp · 8 July 2011, 08:45 AM

I would NOT do that trade. Keep the zero and enjoy winding her every few days. Heck, auto's still need to be wound, at least with a manual wind you know your power reserve is full.

dddrees · 8 July 2011, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by α-ψ!

Only that it's not automatic!!!

That in itself isn't that big of a thing really. I have 2 manual wind watches with my Speedy and Pam 000. Both are pretty easy to wind, in fact that is part of the fun.

barstoolman · 8 July 2011, 09:45 AM

As much as I love the "zero", you gotta make that trade if it's straight up"......there's a huge difference in price and you can always get another "zero".....they are a dime a dozen.

Good luck!!!

B. Doggy · 8 July 2011, 11:11 AM

I owned a 104 for about 5 hours and took it back. The cyclops didn't do it for me on a PAM. Love it on a Rolex though. My opinion is not unlike those above that recommend the 312. Get what you like. The 000 is a nice watch.

Shade · 8 July 2011, 01:02 PM

Nope I wouldnt do it, I like the 000 the best in luminor case.

jvo300 · 8 July 2011, 01:10 PM

Not a trade I would do.

mocheen · 8 July 2011, 01:48 PM

I would keep the 000. The 000 is a beautiful watch. I always have to set the time and date on my automatic watches. Winding the watch just takes a few more twists. I know it is not as convenient as an automatic, but it is not that bad. The PAM 111 is the only manual winding watch that I have and the only other PAM that I could see myself trading it in for would be the 312. The 312 has everything I like about the 111 except it also has the date w/o cyclops and is automatic. I thought about getting a 104 before purely because it was automatic and I was used to having all automatic watches. I was drawn to Panerai originally because of the sandwich dial and the exhibition case back. With the 104 I would lose the sandwich dial, and exhibition case back in favor of the date and automatic functionality. I chose to stick with what originally attracted me to the brand and went with the 111. Good luck with your decision.

α-ψ! · 8 July 2011, 03:37 PM

Thank you everybody I think I will keep zero!! In the future I will maybe look for a 312!!

jnelson3097 · 9 July 2011, 01:30 AM

I'd go for the 312, or any of the models in the 1950s case before the 104.

8 July 2011, 04:24 AM	#1
α-ψ! "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: tolis Location: athens Watch: daytona tt Posts: 194	Trade a logo 000 for a 104?? I was thinking to give my 2 month logo to have a 104!I would like to have your opinions about it!!

8 July 2011, 04:38 AM	#2
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	The logo is pretty sweet but if you are looking for an automatic with date, I would do trade for a 312. Just my two cents... __________________ too much into watches...

8 July 2011, 05:23 AM	#5
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	Constant flipping can become pretty expensive and its always easy to find something you don't already have. As long as you aren't losing to much and it's what you really want................... __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

8 July 2011, 07:17 AM	#6
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Keep the zero. What is the problem with it? __________________ member#3242

8 July 2011, 08:18 AM	#8
MDUB Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Marc Location: SoCal Posts: 65	+1 Keep the Zero I agree with Mik. 312 is nice, but you can save for it and get one LNIB for a decent deal when you are ready and they seem to be more readily available than the 0.

8 July 2011, 08:45 AM	#9
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	I would NOT do that trade. Keep the zero and enjoy winding her every few days. Heck, auto's still need to be wound, at least with a manual wind you know your power reserve is full. __________________ My grails:

8 July 2011, 09:45 AM	#11
barstoolman Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 801	As much as I love the "zero", you gotta make that trade if it's straight up"......there's a huge difference in price and you can always get another "zero".....they are a dime a dozen. Good luck!!!

8 July 2011, 11:11 AM	#12
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	I owned a 104 for about 5 hours and took it back. The cyclops didn't do it for me on a PAM. Love it on a Rolex though. My opinion is not unlike those above that recommend the 312. Get what you like. The 000 is a nice watch. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

8 July 2011, 01:02 PM	#13
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Nope I wouldnt do it, I like the 000 the best in luminor case. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

8 July 2011, 01:10 PM	#14
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	Not a trade I would do.

8 July 2011, 01:48 PM	#15
mocheen "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Aaron Location: San Francisco Watch: 16610LV Posts: 187	I would keep the 000. The 000 is a beautiful watch. I always have to set the time and date on my automatic watches. Winding the watch just takes a few more twists. I know it is not as convenient as an automatic, but it is not that bad. The PAM 111 is the only manual winding watch that I have and the only other PAM that I could see myself trading it in for would be the 312. The 312 has everything I like about the 111 except it also has the date w/o cyclops and is automatic. I thought about getting a 104 before purely because it was automatic and I was used to having all automatic watches. I was drawn to Panerai originally because of the sandwich dial and the exhibition case back. With the 104 I would lose the sandwich dial, and exhibition case back in favor of the date and automatic functionality. I chose to stick with what originally attracted me to the brand and went with the 111. Good luck with your decision.

8 July 2011, 03:37 PM	#16
α-ψ! "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: tolis Location: athens Watch: daytona tt Posts: 194	Thank you everybody I think I will keep zero!! In the future I will maybe look for a 312!!

9 July 2011, 01:30 AM	#17
jnelson3097 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Justin Location: Wisconsin Posts: 1,307	I'd go for the 312, or any of the models in the 1950s case before the 104.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)