The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 July 2011, 06:59 AM   #1
davenotize
"TRF" Member
 
davenotize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: robert
Location: N. Carolina
Watch: 116500
Posts: 195
BIG dilemma 16610 or AP royal oak 14790

Hello everyone, I currently have a sub 16610 Y serial which is my everyday watch i love it and has always been well cared for, but i have this guy who really wants it and wants to trade his Audemars Piguet royal oak 14790 SS for my sub.
Honestly i have always like the royal oak but the price hasnt let me put my hands on it. i need to know more about these watches in order to make my decision, please help advise and opinions! thx
davenotize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 08:01 AM   #2
rad87gn
"TRF" Member
 
rad87gn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
I personally wouldn't do the trade. It's to small for me at 36mm. They seem to be going for $5-$6K range used.
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52
rad87gn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 09:04 AM   #3
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
you said exactly right. you need to see them, try them and decide if you really like them on your wrist. And make sure it's a genuine article as well.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 10:02 AM   #4
Sperry
"TRF" Member
 
Sperry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Jim
Location: Alpha
Posts: 3,383
Both watches are worth about the same, but that AP is a bit more rare.

I've checked out the 39mm RO, and it feels perfectly-sized, even though 35mm-37mm is my preference.

Wearing it would be the next step.

RO service is a bit more than the Rolex service.
Sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 10:28 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Do you prefer the Royal Oak Vs your Sub??? Or do you think you will tire of the RO looks once the novelty wears off?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 10:32 AM   #6
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
That AP is a tad small and only waterproof to 50m, not an ideal daily beater IMO, esp compared to a Sub.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 12:16 PM   #7
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
That AP is a tad small and only waterproof to 50m, not an ideal daily beater IMO, esp compared to a Sub.
x2
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 12:24 PM   #8
davenotize
"TRF" Member
 
davenotize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: robert
Location: N. Carolina
Watch: 116500
Posts: 195
i really like both but im a bit afraid of resale value when it comes to the AP, which one would lose more. here are some pics of the actual watches.



davenotize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 12:24 PM   #9
Lorenzo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Manila
Watch: Sub 116610 / 79090
Posts: 167
maybe you should ask the question in a different forum if you want a different/unbiased reply ... :) if it were up to me, i wouldnt do it.
Lorenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 12:33 PM   #10
GOB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Panama
Posts: 167
Here is an unbiased reply from someone who has had both, albeit not the same AP model. Ever since 1990, I have owned pretty much every model type Rolex has made (Explorer, Sub, Daytona, GMT, Yachtmaster, Date, and Datejust) and multiple versions of each of those and not once did I have any mechanical issues due to malfunction with any of my watches. I used my 2 tone sub and Datejust as if they were regular watches and wore them anywhere from mountain bike riding to fishing offshore. Rock solid piece of machinery all the time. When I sold them all to purchase a Panerai and an AP Rubberclad, I broke even on some watches, lost very little on some, and made money on others, so resale value was top notch and took me all of an hour to find a dealer who would take them in trade.

Got the AP (my grail watch at the time) and the Panerai. The AP was nothing but problems from day one. I had a piece of the bezel chip off (rubber coating), had water intrusion, had the chrono hands spin somewhat on their own, and lastly, one of the chrono hands just fell off altogether! I treated that watch as if it was made out of Venetian crystal and still, it was beyond delicate. I am going to blame "bad luck" on this, but after selling it, I am coming back to Rolex (Daytona YG on strap). Others swear by their APs, it is a very well recognized brand among watch fanatics, but truth be told, based on my experience, I believe its more hype than anything else. For the AP lovers out there, I understand your passion for the brand as I was once in your shoes, but my experience, and the vast amount of money to repair, not to mention the poor resale value, has put me off the brand for a while.
GOB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 12:33 PM   #11
wcl884
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 353
As PSV mentioned the RO is only water resistant at 50m. It really depends if you are going to wear this as an everyday beater. Sub will survive years more without servicing and have more tolerance for banging and grimes. And while the price of service goes up every year, AP will take more money and take longer. Many many watch makers will service Rolex very well as half the price RSC charges - and does the job very well. I can't say I trust too many watch makers with my AP movements.

With that said, I am a big fan of AP RO. I would go with the RO if this is your back-up or 2nd watch.
wcl884 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 01:25 PM   #12
chestercopperpot
"TRF" Member
 
chestercopperpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 249
I own both and I only wear my AP for formal occasions...

You said the sub was your main watch right? I wouldn't do it. AP's are amazing, really beautiful watches...but if the sub is your main watch i wouldn't do it. The sub is just too classic and too durable. AP's are a bit on the fragile side.
chestercopperpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 04:13 PM   #13
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Love them both!
And both are cornerstones in a collection imo.
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 08:36 PM   #14
BeeMee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT IIC
Posts: 153
Check my signature - my AP RO is a 14790 which I purchased new in 1995.

I wore it everyday (when it was not at the AP service center for repair) for 5 years.

The workmanship and attention to detail on the AP is fantastic as compared to any Rolex. However the 14790 AP is not nearly as rugged as your Sub.

As you can see, I have a number of watches. My GMT IIC and my Breitling are my everyday watches. I love to wear the AP RO when wearing a dress shirt or even a long sleeve sport shirt as it is very comfortable and fits well under the cuff of those shirts. It is small compared to your Sub, but I do not feel that it is too small.

I also agree that AP watches do not hold their resale value as well as Rolexes do. Perhaps that is because their retail list prices are too high and unless you buy one at a substantial discount, you will take a huge hit if you sell it.

Lastly, Rolexes are fairly expensive to have serviced at an RSC, but there are several highly recommended independent service people right here on this forum.

However, AP service centers charge prices that make RSC prices seem inexpensive. Personally, I don't know of any recommended independents who will service an AP. Even if a watchmaker is competent to service an AP, they probably cannot purchase replacement AP parts. You will most likely need to use the authorized AP service center for service.

Ultimately, only you can make the decision as to whether this trade is a good deal for you.
__________________
Rolex GMT IIC SS, Tudor Grantour Chrono, 18K/SS, Breitling "Old" Navitimer", SS.
Rolex Day-Date, Bark Finish (recently gifted to son #2)
Rolex Daytona, 18K/SS (recently gifted to son #1)
BeeMee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 08:55 PM   #15
calibre1
"TRF" Member
 
calibre1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: ROLEX, OMEGA
Posts: 279
I have no experience in wearing an AP.

Just based on looks alone I say don't do the trade....keep your Sub.

It's a "do anything, go anywhere" watch that looks good with anything that your wear.

My
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 16570
Rolex Submariner 16610
Omega Seamaster Professional Titanium 2231.50
Omega Speedmaster Professional 3570.50
calibre1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 09:00 PM   #16
johnbeth
"TRF" Member
 
johnbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
Interesting responces everyone, my responce is keep the sub and buy to AP when you have the cash. Thats what I would if I liked both watches.
johnbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 09:29 PM   #17
GoonerStrike
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Ryan
Location: USA
Posts: 122
this is a tough one, considering the 16610 is my favorite watch of all time, I would not make the trade.
GoonerStrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 09:35 PM   #18
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Keep the Sub. The RO is a very good watch, but not nearly as versatile and rugged as the Sub, hence I don't think it could replace your Sub as your everyday watch.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 10:22 PM   #19
mtrunner
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mtrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Bozeman, MT
Watch: 126508 Paul Newman
Posts: 7,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiery View Post
keep the sub. The ro is a very good watch, but not nearly as versatile and rugged as the sub, hence i don't think it could replace your sub as your everyday watch.
+1
mtrunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 11:23 PM   #20
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
I think the AP is great looking, but this comparison is apples to oranges. A Rolex is super tough/robust, whether it's a DJ or Sub (not Cellini), a Rolex can take almost any abuse until you get to diving depths. The AP is a handsome dressier model, and I would probably make a comparison to a DD, rather than Sub-- and, I wouldn't expect the AP to handle the abuse that a DD can.

Pick the one you like, however, I would want to know the service cost for the AP. I would expect to pay double +.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 11:30 PM   #21
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Just don't care for the AP designs.

However, hearing how fragile they are makes me appreciate Rolex even more!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 11:34 PM   #22
Hooper
"TRF" Member
 
Hooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by davenotize View Post
i really like both but im a bit afraid of resale value when it comes to the AP, which one would lose more. here are some pics of the actual watches.



Sub alllllllllllll the way !
Hooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2011, 11:49 PM   #23
foobar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tech
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 46
I have to proudly say 16610! More versatile, rugged and smarter looking ;-)
foobar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2011, 12:09 AM   #24
SilverSun
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 30
If you have always liked the AP then go for it!

IMO the Sub is a better every day watch and should be able to handle whatever you can throw at it. Although the RO is marketed as a sports watch it wears alot more dressier and its shiney and looks like would be prone to scratches if wore for everyday leisure activities - so the sub would probably age better IMO

I have never been a fan of the design of AP but as a brand, and the finishing of the case and bracelet when you try one one, it is in a different level compared to any Rolex. However as mentioned the service costs for AP will be high.

go for whichever smiles at you!
SilverSun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2011, 01:05 AM   #25
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
I'd say hold on to that Sub, but then again, AP watches do nothing at all for me.

Just don't rush a decision that you may regret.
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2011, 04:57 AM   #26
Gharddog03
"TRF" Member
 
Gharddog03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Just don't care for the AP designs.

However, hearing how fragile they are makes me appreciate Rolex even more!
Gharddog03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2011, 09:27 AM   #27
davenotize
"TRF" Member
 
davenotize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: robert
Location: N. Carolina
Watch: 116500
Posts: 195
thanks guys I really appreciate your input, i went to my local AD to try it on one more time and it does feel to fragile and delicate like some of you said it was, maybe because im used to my sub "tank" i dont know but as for now im keeping my sub, maybe later if i get a good deal on the RO 15300 39mm then will consider it.
davenotize is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.