ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 June 2007, 09:50 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
Photographing Rolex ?
Ok, you photo experts. How do I take good photos with my digital carmera. I have an Olympus 770 SW Camera. Laymans terms and how to do with out buying special lights, black boxes, etc...
Also, photos taken with the lower number of pixels so can post on the internet/TRF forum. Seems the photos I tried to take before eith come out blurry or are too reflective. Thanks. |
21 June 2007, 10:20 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
|
Hi Chad,
I take most of mine outside and on the highest pixel setting which is 8 meg on my Sony N1 digital. I usually have a plain background or greenery for contrast. Setting is on macro and I take them from about 6 - 8 inches. I also have a white light box with a fluorescent ring light but I find natural outdoor lighting is better for my amateur status. Watch out for reflections on the crystal but with a bit of practice you can see this on the screen. I then use ACDSee to crop and resize. I'm sure more professional advice will follow and I hope to learn a lot on your thread.
__________________
E |
21 June 2007, 10:24 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
|
Quote:
I Normaly Take Them On My PC Table Or Lightbox |
|
21 June 2007, 11:16 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
Problem is can not take max pixels, as can not then down load on to this forum.
|
21 June 2007, 11:34 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Just shoot at your max pixel on camera then resize with your photo software after you have edited your picture.As long as your picture is sharp a picture of around 800 X 800 pixels will be fine for net images
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
21 June 2007, 11:34 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
Chad, it's pretty simple to build a lightbox. All you need is a box, some white paper and a lamp. It really is just as easy as this:
As Eddie said, be wary of reflections, but the good thing is that most Rolex crystals are flat, so it's easy to offset the angle to eliminate reflections. Take a shot ax max resolution, crop the photo and then resize the image to a max of 800X800 pixels - I just take the longer side of the photo and set it to 800. That's all there is to it.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
22 June 2007, 12:34 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
|
my lightbox....
__________________
the hype is true. a crown for every achievement. visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link? |
22 June 2007, 12:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
I really like this post. This is very helpful advice and information. My problem is that if I go this far to learn how to take great pics of my Rolex will make me become a photographer. I am not looking for a career change.
|
22 June 2007, 12:58 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: NJ
Posts: 726
|
I also use adobe photoshop to resize and adjust the levels as a final touch-up. (My 10MP camera likes to make an extremely large image.) Then I save it using the "save to web" option to lower the amount of memory to view the picture on a webpage while keeping the quality of the image as high as possible.
|
22 June 2007, 01:03 AM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I use this set up.
I photograph OTHER peoples watches at 100 meters. |
22 June 2007, 01:14 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: NJ
Posts: 726
|
|
22 June 2007, 03:13 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
Hi.
I'm a freelance travel photographer and work for Getty Images / Lonely Planet. I don't deal in macro shots anymore, which is what you need macro meaning 1:1, one inch on real life - one on sensor. But this is what you want: 1: A DSLR with a true macro like Canon 100mm f/2.8 would be preferable, combined with a macro flash. 2; cheaper: use a decent digital compact, you'll need a tripod, try to check for bad reflects on the screen, they'll mess up light meetering givin a darkish image, use a decent digital compact with a good macro- never accept less than 1:3 macro when buying or your watch will be very very small. Use a high f-number if you know what the means (big depth of field - or everything in focus) Sincerely Sune http://www.globalphotographic.net Last edited by globalphotographic; 22 June 2007 at 03:21 AM.. Reason: unfinished post posted by mistake |
22 June 2007, 03:29 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
If you really want to go nuts here's a photo 1:5 I took using the combo below
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re.../mp-e-65.shtml --Sune |
22 June 2007, 03:33 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Bolton, UK.
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 6,844
|
Quote:
__________________
A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10 |
|
22 June 2007, 03:33 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Great shot Sune.
Puts a whole new meaning on "in your face". |
22 June 2007, 03:56 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
Thanks AJ / Larry.
Another link to macro photography including watc specific advice from Tamron so-so lens manufacturer. http://www.tamron.com/lenses/macrotips.asp#watch Scroll down one-two pages "good old mechanical watch" --Sune Last edited by globalphotographic; 22 June 2007 at 03:56 AM.. Reason: missing link, pal |
22 June 2007, 04:15 AM | #17 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Great camera work, Sune!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
22 June 2007, 06:25 PM | #18 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
|
Quote:
I don't have F-stop settings on my Sony N1 (well not that I can find in the menu). If I change the ISO setting from auto to its highest setting of 200 (choices are auto-64 -100 or 200) would I expect a digital camera to close down the iris (to give me more depth of field) or reduce the shutter speed (which would not change the depth of field)? I hope I have asked this correctly? eddie
__________________
E |
|
22 June 2007, 08:58 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Bolton, UK.
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 6,844
|
Quote:
According to this review, there is a capability to set the aperture. Have another look through the manual for manual settings. http://www.cameras.co.uk/details/sony-dsc-n1.cfm Adrian.
__________________
A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10 |
|
22 June 2007, 09:12 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
|
thanks Adrian.
__________________
E |
22 June 2007, 09:38 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
Hi Chad,
I haven't setup a light box yet, but I usually use natural ligh as it works best since flash usually cause unncessary reflections. In leiu of the light box, I setup two seperate light sources (white light) using those flexible desk lamps and jus angle it so that the shadows are cancelled out. I then use a background drop cloth to give it a nice background. I also use macro seting and use PS to crop it. With macro photos a steady hand or a tripod will be most useful to get sharp photos.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
23 June 2007, 01:49 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
Hi Eddie.
If you increase ISO less light is needed, and an automatic camera would adjust to a smaller aperture (smaller iris = larger f-number) giving you a wider depth of field but its going to increase the shutter speed as well with no effect on sharpnes if on tripod. However you want to avoid increasing iso due to grains / noise becomming rapidly excessive above ISO 100. -> So take some time to dig up the aperture setting, turn to highes F-number, use a tripod or self release, turn down iso. Photos in artifical light turns out yellowish though, so corrects for this if possible on camera (another very long story about RAW-files could be posted here, I'll refrain :-) Good luck! Sincerely --Sune |
23 June 2007, 01:51 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
|
23 June 2007, 04:14 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: GA, USA
Watch: SS Sub / SS DJ
Posts: 221
|
Sune, awesome pics and great links.
Can you recommend something for me? I have a Nikon D200 with the 18-200 (3.5-5.6) VR Nikkor lens. I'm learning a lot and want to gradually ease into being able to do some neat macro shots, which this lens won't handle. The vast majority of my consumer-only shot making will be done with the 18-200, but is there an inexpensive good 'starter' macro that you would point me towards? It would be used very rarely. Is it a good idea to make sure a macro lens has VR of some sort? So far, my Sony HC7 High-Def camcorder actually seems to take 'ok' macro shots, but I really want to use the D200. Thanks - hope this doesn't 'hijack' the thread, it looks like a great overall discussion of macro pics, and I know several of us on the board have Nikon DSLR's.
__________________
His - SS Submariner Date Hers - SS Oyster Date, Blue Dial "SS Daytona Waiting List" Member NO LONGER! |
23 June 2007, 04:43 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Changes a lot
Posts: 75
|
Cheapest Nikon Macro:
NIKKOR AF 60/2,8D MICRO at around 250$ buy at B&H in N.Y. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Autofocus.html For watches it'd be the best since 60mm means you'll 1) get it checp 2) have a great depth of field which the 105mm or more wouldn't lend you 3) don't need more zoom since watches wont escape as you approach :-) You've got a nice camera, it needs decent tires - like the 60mm f/2.8 macro A new world of macro watches will appear!! Have fun --Sune |
10 May 2008, 10:44 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: Oklahoma City
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 411
|
Awesome post! Thanks for the great info!
Paul |
11 May 2008, 03:39 AM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: John Kim
Location: Cerriros, CA
Watch: Blue Submariner TT
Posts: 380
|
I got turned off to photography when everything went digital after I spent $$ building up my Canon USM collection with EOS 5 body.
Now, after many years of just using a Point & Shoot Digital Elph, I have my tail in between my legs and crawling back to Canon to look for a DSLR body. Since I do not want to Spend $$$$ for something that will be outdated in a few years, I am considering the Rebel xti. Any comments? |
11 May 2008, 03:51 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, Swatch
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
|
|
11 May 2008, 04:15 AM | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
Now I need to check on the macro flash you mention. Thanks for weighing in with your expertise. |
|
11 May 2008, 05:40 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Great thread!
Went straight to my bookmarks!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.