ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 August 2011, 05:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: #296
Posts: 792
|
golf GPSs
Hi there
Im looking to purchase either a Sky Caddie SGX or a Golf Buddy world platinum. What are your experiences with either? Or in fact you may have a better suggestion on the matter? Kind regards Jon |
17 August 2011, 06:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,398
|
I have bought a Garmin S1 approach watch - it's simple and as it's a watch it's dead convenient to simply look at my wrist for instant yardage to front middle and back of the green. No subscriptions, it simply finds the ten nearest courses to you. Cost me £160 but far better for me as I've had a bushnell laser and a sky caddie before but the convenience of this far outweighs the pros of other devices.
Have a look at http://m.direct-golf.co.uk/#/golfproduct/?id=11984 |
17 August 2011, 06:46 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: #296
Posts: 792
|
Cheers golfpunk I shall take a look.
Jon |
17 August 2011, 06:49 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
I have the older skycaddie and LOVE it. Only one I have experience with. I don't use it that much on my home course but when on vacations I use it a lot.
|
17 August 2011, 08:06 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
How about you play golf like real men and women? Use course markers and your own eyeballs.
Until the pros use GPS devices during competition, I'm not going to be a slave to technology. Yes, I know they use GPS devices during their practice rounds and take meticulous notes, but their very livelihoods depend on it. When I'm out at my club, the last thing I want to do is grind THAT hard over trying to go low. GPS isn't going to make you a scratch golfer if you've got poor technique or equipment that is not fitted for your swing/game.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
17 August 2011, 09:02 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Quote:
|
|
17 August 2011, 10:29 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 592
|
I don't see an issue with using GPS. I don't have the time to develop a book on every course I play.
|
17 August 2011, 02:08 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Northville, MI,US
Watch: Smstr 600m BigBlue
Posts: 412
|
I hope this isn't hijacking the thread, but have your thought about a rangefinder instead?
I mention this since I've had one for 11 yrs. It started to die, so wife buys me a GPS (callaway uproMax). I used it for about a month. A few points: It had multiple views- one was like a flyover. It showed how far each hazard was and had a function to show how far it was to a lay up and then to the hole. The more basic views just showed distance to hazards and front, center and back of green. - It had a great screen that was easy to read in the sun - It was smaller than a small cell phone so I kept it in my pocket - The battery would last about 1.5 rounds But I returned it. Primarily because they were having some issues with them and would stop selling them. It scared me away since I was worried that support for it would go away before I would quit golfing with it. It did lock up for me a bit and some of the touch options would fail. Also, it was a bit too sensitive with moving and zooming. Also, it always took a few seconds to restart when it went to sleep between shots. Not a huge deal, but yeah, slower than a rangefinder. They are giving me a bit more than I paid for it or would give me a lot more if I took a gift card from the company. I took the check. I would have kept it if they didn't make this offer though- so Yeah I liked it for the most part. It would keep track of how long you hit a club (if you wanted to) and they were supposed to add in a bunch more features. But I'm going back to the Rangefinder, why? -Legal to use ( I don't think GPS's are truly allowed????) -power lasts for over a season if not many -Gives distance to the pin- not just the green ( though I do like knowing distance to front and rear of green) - I'm getting a smart phone and there are many apps that give you the same thing for free or a small fee (BTW some of our courses are putting FREE wireless on them.) - I can quickly shoot distance to a tree or other locations with the rangefinder. The GPS would do it, but I wasn't always sure what tree it was going to. -downside is they can cost a bit more, but hunting on the net can turn up some values. (I got mine for about what the GPS cost- $200-250) -you can't see a hole layout if you're not familiar with the course. So, something to think about anyway. But the GPS is a bit of a toy and I did enjoy having it. Good luck and enjoy your toy though.
__________________
RedwinGV |
17 August 2011, 02:47 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Des
Location: China
Watch: 16613 16710 116520
Posts: 2,841
|
Free golf GPS app on my iPhone, works a treat.
__________________
TRFs "after Dark" bar and NightClub Addict Punctuality is the courtesy shown only by Kings Dalip: "GTG posts are worthless without pics, absolutely worthless" |
17 August 2011, 02:57 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
You're dead wrong about the USGA and R&A sanctioning usage of distance measuring devices IN COMPETITION. The R&A website itself is clear in spelling out that usage of such devices is contrary to the Rules of Golf, but that a Committee can permit the usage of such a device as a Local rule. The USGA follows a similar line of thought, with distance measuring devices allowed by Local Rule. However, you will not see a distance measuring device used in competition during the US Open or The Open Championship or any PGA Tour event. As I said above, they can be utilized during the course of practice rounds prior to the competition, but once medal play has begun they are forbidden from usage. Feel free to post any images or video of players or caddies using distance finders during official rounds at either Royal St. Georges or Congressional CC. I'll save you the time and let you know that no one uses a distance finder once they've officially teed off. If you're trying to shave a couple of strokes by using an artificial aid, that's your prerogative. There's way too much technology already in use to make a difficult game a bit easier. At my country club, if you shoot a bad round, that invariably means you're breaking out the money clip when it comes time to true up at the 19th hole.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
|
17 August 2011, 06:49 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
I use Golfshot GPS iphone app. It was only $35 and works at 22,000 courses around the world for no extra download costs. You would need to have an Iphone 4 with the better battery life .
All my golfing partners have expensive GPS units and my iphone is always within 2m reading of the best units + your get satellite view of the course as well |
18 August 2011, 01:54 AM | #12 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: #296
Posts: 792
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When I make my decision I will let you know. Kind regards Jon |
|||
18 August 2011, 02:06 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: midwest
Watch: SS Datejust
Posts: 1,288
|
If I could just find one that helps me get the ball thru the clowns mouth I would buy that.
|
18 August 2011, 11:16 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Quote:
|
|
18 August 2011, 02:01 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
|
18 August 2011, 02:27 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Quote:
|
|
19 August 2011, 01:12 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick H.
Location: Amherst, NY
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,901
|
love my skycaddie
|
19 August 2011, 09:39 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: #296
Posts: 792
|
Update, I have ordered the Golf Buddy World Platinum.
When I manage to get my hands on it and my head around it I will post a review. Kind regards Jon |
20 August 2011, 02:18 AM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
When you play the same course often, you have a good idea what the yardage is and you're able to decide which club to hit just from experience. When you don't know the course, GPS is the quickest and most accurate method of getting the yardage. It takes about as much time as it takes to pull a club out of the bag. |
|
20 August 2011, 03:24 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
And the fact is that GPS is not accurate to the inch. I find they're off by a couple of yards at a minimum. Further, you typically have to wait for the satellite signal to propagate to your device once you've set your bag down. The distance finders that use a laser to measure to a point at the top of the flag are more accurate IMO, but we all have seen that it takes some time to aim it properly. And I've seen plenty of instances where the yardage number returned was obviously wrong b/c the laser was measuring to something in the background rather than the flag. I know that there's value beyond the golf course in teaching my sons to eyeball a distance, as well as to triangulate based upon course markers/yard sticks. They will not use electronic aids until they're competition ready.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
|
20 August 2011, 08:16 AM | #21 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
I'm not looking to get the yardage down to the inch, nor have I suggested that GPS is that precise. A couple of yards is good enough for me. The times I've used them, I've found them to provide a pretty good estimate (I don't own one). They especially shine when you've hit a shot off line and there are no course markers nearby. Lasers are great when you have line of sight access to a target large enough to get a good reflection. My experience is that's not always the case on the golf course. I've also found them to be less convenient than GPS. On the courses I play, I tend to have quite a bit of time before the group ahead is clear. Even when playing quickly, I've found the better GPS units have a very short lag time. They're certainly quicker than someone pacing 20 yards off from a marker. I've seen iPhone aps that were really slow, but I've also heard other guys say their's updates quickly. |
|
20 August 2011, 09:21 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
If you're inside the cart path and the yardage sticks, there should be enough markers available to get a reasonably accurate yardage faster than a GPS could provide.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
|
20 August 2011, 09:37 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 592
|
If someone uses a GPS unit four or five times in a round to get the yardage, I'd hardly call that standing around fiddling with it. Some of the ones I've seen in use didn't require fiddling, the owner just looked at it and read off the yardage.
I have yet to meet a golfer who never hits a wayward shot or two (and I have met a few touring pros). If there are adequate markers, I use them. When I have to hunt around for the nearest marker only to find there's nothing close, it would be nice to have a device hanging from my bag that provides the yardage at a glance. Not all courses use sticks. And those that use sprinkler heads don't have them all marked (and the markings don't all age well). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.