ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

masterkiller · 8 October 2011, 03:18 AM

...so different...

My 112 and my friends 176!

/masterkiller

garGARgar · 8 October 2011, 03:42 AM

I really like the look of brushed Ti...but prefer SS on my watches.

112...one day.

TSW · 8 October 2011, 04:39 AM

Great looking pair!

eric23 · 8 October 2011, 04:45 AM

Nice Pair, Congrats!

Cru Jones · 8 October 2011, 05:18 AM

Nice pair!! I, too, prefer the "pop" of SS.

barstoolman · 8 October 2011, 05:51 AM

Ti is just too dull............

texex91 · 8 October 2011, 06:31 AM

I like the Ti, it's much lighter than SS. BUT, I think having a mix of both is good.

runs_wscissors · 8 October 2011, 06:49 AM

Give owner impressions or differences between the two please.

- weight
- durability (scratched)

632627 · 9 October 2011, 01:37 AM

Weight is definitely noticeable, I had a 005 which I sold and 176. 176 was much more comfortable and got more wrist time. From what I've heard, ss is more scratch resistant.

dalip · 9 October 2011, 01:55 AM

Both great looking watches. I prefer SS simply because I like a bit of weight in a bigger watch like a PAM. I also found the dial bounces more of the SS. But both are stunners!

sea-dweller · 10 October 2011, 01:12 AM

Nice duo!

8 October 2011, 03:18 AM	#1
masterkiller "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Sweden Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM... Posts: 1,403	PAM112 & PAM176, so alike and yet... ...so different... My 112 and my friends 176! /masterkiller Attached Images __________________ Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO

8 October 2011, 03:42 AM	#2
garGARgar "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Gary Location: New York, NY Watch: 16610LV Posts: 711	I really like the look of brushed Ti...but prefer SS on my watches. 112...one day. __________________ 16610LV 126334 116710LN

8 October 2011, 04:39 AM	#3
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Great looking pair! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

9 October 2011, 01:55 AM	#10
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	Both great looking watches. I prefer SS simply because I like a bit of weight in a bigger watch like a PAM. I also found the dial bounces more of the SS. But both are stunners! __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

8 October 2011, 04:45 AM	#4
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	Nice Pair, Congrats!

8 October 2011, 05:18 AM	#5
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	Nice pair!! I, too, prefer the "pop" of SS.

8 October 2011, 05:51 AM	#6
barstoolman Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 801	Ti is just too dull............

8 October 2011, 06:31 AM	#7
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	I like the Ti, it's much lighter than SS. BUT, I think having a mix of both is good.

8 October 2011, 06:49 AM	#8
runs_wscissors Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: DC Posts: 18	Give owner impressions or differences between the two please. - weight - durability (scratched)

9 October 2011, 01:37 AM	#9
632627 Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: los angeles Posts: 37	Weight is definitely noticeable, I had a 005 which I sold and 176. 176 was much more comfortable and got more wrist time. From what I've heard, ss is more scratch resistant.

10 October 2011, 01:12 AM	#11
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Nice duo!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)