ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 October 2011, 11:11 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Chris
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610 LN, 16800
Posts: 863
|
thoughts on this 5513?
Fine condition vintage Rolex Submariner reference 5513 on leather bracelet. The case dial and bezel are all in pristine condition. The watch is dated by marking inside case which indicates it was made in the 3rd quarter of 1966, a personalized engraving on the case back shows that it was presented as a gift in 1967
Looking for $4950.... |
23 October 2011, 11:21 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
I think it's okay, what a clean engine under the hood.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
23 October 2011, 11:21 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
What is the serial number....Somewhere in the 1.5 area the gild dials were replaced with the meters first dials......Sounds like it's right on that edge???
The markers look to have a greenish tint....Not a big fan of that color myself but depending on price and service history, it looks fine... |
24 October 2011, 12:46 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
|
I was wondering what the earlier matte dials were made. What are the first two digits of the serial number??
Not fan of any kind of greenish tint either. |
24 October 2011, 02:56 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Chris
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610 LN, 16800
Posts: 863
|
The serial is 158XXXX...he's looking around 5K.
Am on the fence. |
24 October 2011, 03:33 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
With the serial 1.58mill, it means this watch was one of the first during the transition from gilt to matte. The watch looks like a nice example, but something about the lume IMO is a bit odd, could just be the picture though. Other than that, looks to have a clean 1520 cal. and a nice fat font insert & fat case. @ $4950, its priced right for the current market.
|
24 October 2011, 04:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
|
Do I see three dots on the crown? Should be twinlock if I am not mistaken?
|
24 October 2011, 07:03 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Appears the watch has been serviced. like someone else said the crown should not be triplock... Maybe it is a replacement?
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
24 October 2011, 07:18 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
It most probably is but that not a showstopper IMHO.
|
26 October 2011, 12:59 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
|
Nice piece......would be even nicer with a original Superdome crystal.
As for the plots, I have seen a couple of MF's with puffy plots and they were original. Something about the late 60's dials, some even have plots that will still glow momentarily when exposed to light. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.