ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

pdoukas · 1 November 2011, 07:45 AM

Nothing about this listing looks good:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-GMT-MA...#ht_989wt_1189

First of all, in 1958, there were no crown guards. Even so the next iteration came out in 1959 with pointed crown guards.

1.1 million serial dates 1964/65 in which case the case would have square crown guards if 1965.

Seller is sooooooo not disclosing the truth about this watch.

Just my humble opinion though.

Pete

tudorman8276 · 1 November 2011, 03:22 PM

...have you messaged him pointing all this out to him??

pdoukas · 2 November 2011, 07:48 AM

nope.......every time I point something out to the ebay folks they tell me to mind my own business......

Goiguidoc · 2 November 2011, 08:05 AM

Pete, I agree with your comment.
The serial number doesn't correspond to the model on the pics.
Doesn't make any sense.

Also, EBay doesn't care about fakes.
I have decided to stop reporting counterfeit items.
I will only report them on TRF.

T-Rip · 2 November 2011, 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pdoukas

nope.......every time I point something out to the ebay folks they tell me to mind my own business......

Me too.. Its funny...

dysondiver · 2 November 2011, 08:36 AM

i think its good work you guys do , and it would be a shame to stop... i think e bay could help if they had a removed because of fraud sticker ,,,, it would do them good in the long term.
keep up the good work.
ygag.

toph · 2 November 2011, 08:40 AM

clearly the guy has made a mistake about the date of the watch. 1.1 as you say is most likely 64. that is it . He shows the service dial on watch etc etc. Original dial is also not original to the watch but is a later original rolex dial. I doubt he knows that. Really dont think he is doing that badly compared to the real thiefs.

1 November 2011, 07:45 AM	#1
pdoukas "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Pete Location: Arizona Watch: ing Duke bball Posts: 1,488	This screams bad deal Nothing about this listing looks good: http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-GMT-MA...#ht_989wt_1189 First of all, in 1958, there were no crown guards. Even so the next iteration came out in 1959 with pointed crown guards. 1.1 million serial dates 1964/65 in which case the case would have square crown guards if 1965. Seller is sooooooo not disclosing the truth about this watch. Just my humble opinion though. Pete Last edited by pdoukas; 1 November 2011 at 07:48 AM.. Reason: mistake on wording

1 November 2011, 03:22 PM	#2
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	...mmmmmmm... ...have you messaged him pointing all this out to him??

2 November 2011, 08:40 AM	#7
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	clearly the guy has made a mistake about the date of the watch. 1.1 as you say is most likely 64. that is it . He shows the service dial on watch etc etc. Original dial is also not original to the watch but is a later original rolex dial. I doubt he knows that. Really dont think he is doing that badly compared to the real thiefs. __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

2 November 2011, 07:48 AM	#3
pdoukas "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Pete Location: Arizona Watch: ing Duke bball Posts: 1,488	nope.......every time I point something out to the ebay folks they tell me to mind my own business......

2 November 2011, 08:05 AM	#4
Goiguidoc "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Greg Location: Europe Watch: Rolex vintage Posts: 1,062	Pete, I agree with your comment. The serial number doesn't correspond to the model on the pics. Doesn't make any sense. Also, EBay doesn't care about fakes. I have decided to stop reporting counterfeit items. I will only report them on TRF.

2 November 2011, 08:36 AM	#6
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	i think its good work you guys do , and it would be a shame to stop... i think e bay could help if they had a removed because of fraud sticker ,,,, it would do them good in the long term. keep up the good work. ygag.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)