ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 November 2011, 11:15 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 40
|
Rolex DeepSea
I am considering purchasing this piece however, I own a GMTII in SS and recognize they are very similar. I am curious to hear what folks think about owning theses two pieces. Are they too similar to add the DSSD to my collection?
|
8 November 2011, 11:18 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
The DSSD is one of a great watch.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
8 November 2011, 11:19 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 451
|
My situation is reverse. I have a DSSD and today the mailman will bring me the GMT IIC. They look similar from far away but there is nothing similar about them. Two different animals. Only thing they share is the reflectivity of light from the bezel. Go get your DSSD-- you will not regret it.
The GMTIIC is more wearable than the DSSD on a daily basis though. |
8 November 2011, 11:40 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NY
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 109
|
I think it's perfect. One's a mans watch and one for your significant other.
|
8 November 2011, 11:44 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
well, they are both rolex sports watches with black dials and bezels, but, the similarities stop there.....if you like it, go for it.
|
9 November 2011, 12:09 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
IMO, the similarities between the DSSD and GMTII are few. However, I would strongly recommend trying the DSSD on before buying it. It is an enormous watch, which might sound appealing now, but it's size can turn some owners off over time.
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
9 November 2011, 12:16 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
The DSSD is a marvel of engineering, however the design and implementation falls short esthetically IMO.
|
9 November 2011, 12:23 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: L.I./N.Y.
Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M
Posts: 2,769
|
Quote:
|
|
9 November 2011, 12:39 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Huntington Bch CA
Posts: 258
|
The DSSD is, apparently, not for everyone.
For me, that's just an added bonus that I was not aware of when I purchased mine. It has replaced my TT blue Sub as a daily wearer. |
9 November 2011, 12:40 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
It's up to you.
|
9 November 2011, 12:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
DSSD is it's own animal. It's an awesome beast.
|
9 November 2011, 01:06 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
|
The Dssd is a very thick watch compared to your GMT.
While I had the big watch itch, I got a Deep blue Master 2k for a very reasonable price. It's an awesome watch but I seldom wear it due to the weight and heft. This probably saved me upwards of 9k because in the end I chose a Sub C over the DSSD. It's one thing to go to an AD and try on on for a minute but a whole other to wear it for a day or two and see if the time piece still pleases you. Having said that the DSSD is a beautiful time piece imo. Whats your wrist size? Chibatastic |
9 November 2011, 01:06 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
|
Double post..
|
9 November 2011, 01:32 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
They are "similar" but different enough to be enjoyed individually IMHO !
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.