ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

STEELINOX · 1 December 2011, 01:51 PM

Welp, here's a good one fs at WatchUSeek !

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-...ml#post4491823

toph · 1 December 2011, 01:56 PM

The bracelet on the watch and the one he shows stampings of are different as far as i can see. I also think the insert is not original but as for the actual watch, from looking at the bad pictures, i am finding it hard to acertain what is giving it away as totally fake.

STEELINOX · 1 December 2011, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toph

the bracelet on the watch and the one he shows stampings of are different. I also think the insert is not original but as for the actual watch, form looking at the bad pictures, i am finding it hard to acertain what is giving it away as totally fake.

The guys got different watches, one with SEL, one without.

The font at "6" is about faded as to the rest of the minute track...

The cyclops mag is wrong...

toph · 1 December 2011, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

The guys got different watches, one with SEL, one without.

The font at "6" is about faded as to the rest of the minute track...

The cyclops mag is wrong...

yes i was about to say the swiss t<25 has faded really badly or maybe it came that way

STEELINOX · 1 December 2011, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toph

yes i was about to say the swiss t<25 has faded really badly or maybe it came that way

Meh, I also dont like the coronet above "ROLEX" ...

STEELINOX · 1 December 2011, 02:19 PM

This image shows a waaay fat/short "9" marker...

imono · 1 December 2011, 02:43 PM

The 3rd picture shows an SEL bracelet which does not belong.
The seller is sure showing lousy pictures as well.
A pain in the butt to buy it with guaranteed problems later on.

Freelance · 1 December 2011, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

The guys got different watches, one with SEL, one without.

The font at "6" is about faded as to the rest of the minute track...

The cyclops mag is wrong...

The 2 different bracelets photo'd is a bit strange, but the MAG is CORRECT. 16610 and 16570's have shallow rehauts which make the date look smaller. I was once 'questioned' on the authenticity of mine based on the same 'should be bigger' argument.

He is guilty of bad photo's for sure.

RollieFan · 2 December 2011, 01:06 AM

hmmmm. hard to tell from the pic here. But it looks like the correct hand stack. Very few fakes get the hand stack correct. And the few that have the moddified movement to get it right are horribly unreliable.

Showing pics of two diffreent braclets isnt helping this guy.

1 December 2011, 01:51 PM	#1
STEELINOX 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Sink-O! Location: a praire in AZ Watch: ROLEX-less atm... Posts: 14,021	GMT MASTER FS at WatchUSeek ! Welp, here's a good one fs at WatchUSeek ! http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-...ml#post4491823 __________________ *Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !

1 December 2011, 01:56 PM	#2
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	The bracelet on the watch and the one he shows stampings of are different as far as i can see. I also think the insert is not original but as for the actual watch, from looking at the bad pictures, i am finding it hard to acertain what is giving it away as totally fake. __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

1 December 2011, 02:19 PM	#6
STEELINOX 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Sink-O! Location: a praire in AZ Watch: ROLEX-less atm... Posts: 14,021	This image shows a waaay fat/short "9" marker... __________________ *Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !

1 December 2011, 02:43 PM	#7
imono "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: USA Posts: 3,241	The 3rd picture shows an SEL bracelet which does not belong. The seller is sure showing lousy pictures as well. A pain in the butt to buy it with guaranteed problems later on.

2 December 2011, 01:06 AM	#9
RollieFan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Midwest Posts: 35	hmmmm. hard to tell from the pic here. But it looks like the correct hand stack. Very few fakes get the hand stack correct. And the few that have the moddified movement to get it right are horribly unreliable. Showing pics of two diffreent braclets isnt helping this guy.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)