ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cdrii · 26 December 2011, 02:38 PM

Hi All,

With my 50th birthday fast approaching (Feb 8) I am still torn between a new GMT IIc or a preowned V-series Black Faced Daytona with the newer clasp.

This will be my 4th Rolex joining two DJ TT & a Serti Subby.

Now I know it is all personal preference, I am well aware of the pros and cons of both watches and believe I would be happy with either...however, having said that, I would hate to have buyers remorse after the purchase.

Since I regularly rotate my watches, neither watch will be an everyday watch

I don't think the fact the Daytona has no date would be a big issue. I can't get away from the fact that the Daytona is still tough to find new at dealers and very desireable.

The new GMT IIc is also a beauty, and easier to obtain as most AD's have them new and many TRF sellers have them.

I admit, I like having items that are "tougher" to find making them a little more exclusive.

Will I be using the functions of either watch? Probably not, heck I don't dive with my Subby so I doubt I would use the timer on the Daytona or the 2nd time on the GMT.

Yes, I am well aware there are bigger problems in this wicked wicked world, and this issue is not one of them, but isn't that why we have this forum?

Anyway, I would still love any input, particularly from those owners who have both watches. Happy Holidays to all and thank you in advance for your thoughts.

Mickey® · 26 December 2011, 02:41 PM

BIG 50!
Go Daytona! It will go good with the TT DJ and the SERTI Sub.

KSUwildcats · 26 December 2011, 02:52 PM

Here is my Christmas present. I love it. I have a 6263 daytona, but have been eyeing this for 2 years now. Finally, I am a happy owner!

I had to show off my new baby too!

FeelingTheBlues · 26 December 2011, 02:54 PM

I don't own neither of those but I'd like to share my opinion if you don't mind.

Given your current collection, I believe you have three watches that are quite different despite the fact that you own two Datejusts (I think the leather band makes quite a difference in between the two of them). Having said that, my preference would be the Daytona because it would look more different and unique in your collection than a GMT-II (and I'm saying this even if I prefer the GMT). As well, you added that you liked rarer watches and I think the Daytona would fall in that category more than a GMT you can and will be able to find in AD's and on the second hand market for many years to come.

Sorry for the long post, whichever you buy will be a fabulous choice anyway, just make sure you take your time when choosing and you will never regret it!

bgriz · 26 December 2011, 02:58 PM

I'd go Daytona for the reasons you mentioned and given that you said you wouldn't miss the date. I have one on the way right now myself, except it's a white face!

Mickey® · 26 December 2011, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUwildcats

Here is my Christmas present. I love it. I have a 6263 daytona, but have been eyeing this for 2 years now. Finally, I am a happy owner!

I had to show off my new baby too!

Congrats!
Thanks from all of us for taking plastic bezel protector off in 3rd photo.

opaline460 · 26 December 2011, 02:59 PM

Daytona in your case.

GlobalGooch69 · 26 December 2011, 03:05 PM

I would go for the gmt for a few reasons. 1. It has a date 2. It has wider lugs giving it the appearance of a larger case 3. I would disagree with saying the daytona is rare, go on eBay and see for yourself there are a lot more daytonas for sale than there are ceramic gmts and 4. The BRAND new gmt can be bought for LESS than the USED daytona. The gmt also feels great on the wrist. I vote gmt but both are great choices, good luck!

KSUwildcats · 26 December 2011, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickey®

Congrats!
Thanks from all of us for taking plastic bezel protector off in 3rd photo.

LOL, yeah, hard to remove her guard. But she is mine now! I truly do love it!!

DolphinV8 · 26 December 2011, 03:16 PM

The Daytona is more exclusive than the GMT2-C, but it's not that hard to find one these days.

MCHI09 · 26 December 2011, 03:17 PM

I have and really like both watches. Having said that I would go Daytona, It is my clear favorite.

BTW, I actually like not having to set the date when I haven't worn it in a while :)

TSts · 26 December 2011, 03:56 PM

Short answer, I bought both. You may also...

htc8p · 26 December 2011, 06:45 PM

i like the gmt more but in your case you should get the daytona.

its good to have it in rotation as a luxury watch (especially for 50) since the gmt is still considered a tool watch.

petesjag · 26 December 2011, 06:49 PM

The daytona Is awsome but i would choose the gmt because its new and would complement your callection better... The gmt Is big and rugged unlike your dj s and subby...

Ear Pain · 26 December 2011, 07:19 PM

This.....

padi56 · 26 December 2011, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUwildcats

Here is my Christmas present. I love it. I have a 6263 daytona, but have been eyeing this for 2 years now. Finally, I am a happy owner!

I had to show off my new baby too!

Well IMHO you made the right choice there is only one Rolex Daytona and thats the vintage ones.Myself not a fan of the modern Daytona line up just don't like the bezel and dial layout.l Now a modern day Daytona with a dial and black aluminium insert like say the 6263 IMHO that would be a very nice watch.The GMTc is a very good watch one of the best that Rolex has brought out since introduction of the 3 series movements in 1988/9.

Solomander · 26 December 2011, 08:57 PM

I think that the Daytona would complement your current collection. The GMT II is generally similar to the Submariner in appearance. The Daytona would give you a different look and a different vibe.

dddrees · 26 December 2011, 09:00 PM

Either way you can't go wrong, both are extremely nice watches. I have both and you may find you eventually do the same as well. For me the GMTIIC is something I wear more often and I wear the Daytona for more special occasions.

OrangeSport · 26 December 2011, 09:21 PM

I would go for the GMT all day long. It just shouts to me when the Daytona doesn't. I prefer buying new too.

But, ultimately, you have to decide which grabs you harder....

Nice decision to have to make though!

Gerardus · 26 December 2011, 11:35 PM

New, new, new, thats the pick!
and the GMTIIC is awesome!

HL65 · 26 December 2011, 11:39 PM

For me- Daytona. With that said get whichever one you feel sings to you the most. It doesn't matter much what we think as it won't be on our wrists. In the end it is a good place to be though because either way you can't really go wrong.

Art 1 · 26 December 2011, 11:40 PM

Depends on what functions you could use. The GMT would be much more easier to read the time.

nauticajoe · 26 December 2011, 11:45 PM

Daytona's got my vote.

btrue · 26 December 2011, 11:54 PM

I am not a fan of the Daytona's look, but I have to agree with others who have mentioned that the sub and gmt are very similar and a Daytona would add some diversity to your collection!

You will probably be quite pleased with either!

impalass · 27 December 2011, 12:09 AM

Daytona

The Joker · 27 December 2011, 12:39 AM

Daytona

Jakey · 27 December 2011, 01:15 AM

The Daytona. It's an amazing watch. I have owned several Rolex's but the Daytona was a whole different feeling. All the best.

kilyung · 27 December 2011, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdrii

With my 50th birthday fast approaching (Feb 8)

I have both but would probably opt for the Daytona first... to then be traded in for a GMTc in a few years. Enjoy the Daytona while you can read it and get the GMTc when your eyes deteriorate.

Art 1 · 27 December 2011, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I have both but would probably opt for the Daytona first... to then be traded in for a GMTc in a few years. Enjoy the Daytona while you can read it and get the GMTc when your eyes deteriorate.

Exactly, well said. I plan on doing similar with my daytona. It's just too tough to read and the chrono is worthless, to me. But I have enjoyed wearing it over the years.

impalass · 27 December 2011, 03:23 AM

As a new SS Daytona black dial owner and self confessed timing everything/ anything idiot, yes the Daytona is a pain in the a$$ to read, especially coming from a Speedmaster Pro.

It took me around three weeks to get use to the Daytona chrono sweep hand and sub dials, no more reading the timing functions at a glance, it just takes a second or three longer. More time spent taking in the beauty of the dial, lol.

I have been a Daytona "fanboy" since the early 70's when AD's could'nt give them away, believe it or not, and of course being an older man now wearing bifocals fulltime may make all the difference.

26 December 2011, 02:38 PM	#1
cdrii Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: los angeles Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 133	Torn between New GMT IIc or V-series preowned Daytona Hi All, With my 50th birthday fast approaching (Feb 8) I am still torn between a new GMT IIc or a preowned V-series Black Faced Daytona with the newer clasp. This will be my 4th Rolex joining two DJ TT & a Serti Subby. Now I know it is all personal preference, I am well aware of the pros and cons of both watches and believe I would be happy with either...however, having said that, I would hate to have buyers remorse after the purchase. Since I regularly rotate my watches, neither watch will be an everyday watch I don't think the fact the Daytona has no date would be a big issue. I can't get away from the fact that the Daytona is still tough to find new at dealers and very desireable. The new GMT IIc is also a beauty, and easier to obtain as most AD's have them new and many TRF sellers have them. I admit, I like having items that are "tougher" to find making them a little more exclusive. Will I be using the functions of either watch? Probably not, heck I don't dive with my Subby so I doubt I would use the timer on the Daytona or the 2nd time on the GMT. Yes, I am well aware there are bigger problems in this wicked wicked world, and this issue is not one of them, but isn't that why we have this forum? Anyway, I would still love any input, particularly from those owners who have both watches. Happy Holidays to all and thank you in advance for your thoughts.

26 December 2011, 02:52 PM	#3
KSUwildcats "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: United States Watch: Daytona 6263 Posts: 26	gmt!! Here is my Christmas present. I love it. I have a 6263 daytona, but have been eyeing this for 2 years now. Finally, I am a happy owner! I had to show off my new baby too! Attached Images

26 December 2011, 02:54 PM	#4
FeelingTheBlues "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Carl Location: Always moving Watch: If you wish... Posts: 22,039	I don't own neither of those but I'd like to share my opinion if you don't mind. Given your current collection, I believe you have three watches that are quite different despite the fact that you own two Datejusts (I think the leather band makes quite a difference in between the two of them). Having said that, my preference would be the Daytona because it would look more different and unique in your collection than a GMT-II (and I'm saying this even if I prefer the GMT). As well, you added that you liked rarer watches and I think the Daytona would fall in that category more than a GMT you can and will be able to find in AD's and on the second hand market for many years to come. Sorry for the long post, whichever you buy will be a fabulous choice anyway, just make sure you take your time when choosing and you will never regret it! __________________ Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin

26 December 2011, 02:58 PM	#5
bgriz 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Brian Location: Chicagoland Watch: ing the markets Posts: 2,194	I'd go Daytona for the reasons you mentioned and given that you said you wouldn't miss the date. I have one on the way right now myself, except it's a white face! __________________ 126600 SD43 Red 126710BLRO GMT II PEPSI 178274 Midsize DJ Rhodium/Roman- Hers 126334 DJ41 in blue, fluted, on jubilee 116509 Daytona WG Panda 114060 Sub no date 126621 YM Chocolate dial Root Beer 126710BLNR Batman 126613LB Bluesy 126711CHNR GMT II Root Beer

26 December 2011, 03:56 PM	#12
TSts "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: So-Cal USA Posts: 1,067	Short answer, I bought both. You may also... __________________ 116710LN 116300blro

26 December 2011, 02:41 PM	#2
Mickey® Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Mickey® Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Swiss Made Posts: 5,801	BIG 50! Go Daytona! It will go good with the TT DJ and the SERTI Sub.

26 December 2011, 02:59 PM	#7
opaline460 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,386	Daytona in your case.

26 December 2011, 03:05 PM	#8
GlobalGooch69 Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: USA Posts: 116	I would go for the gmt for a few reasons. 1. It has a date 2. It has wider lugs giving it the appearance of a larger case 3. I would disagree with saying the daytona is rare, go on eBay and see for yourself there are a lot more daytonas for sale than there are ceramic gmts and 4. The BRAND new gmt can be bought for LESS than the USED daytona. The gmt also feels great on the wrist. I vote gmt but both are great choices, good luck!

26 December 2011, 03:16 PM	#10
DolphinV8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Earth Watch: 16610LV Posts: 949	The Daytona is more exclusive than the GMT2-C, but it's not that hard to find one these days.

26 December 2011, 03:17 PM	#11
MCHI09 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Mark Location: IL Watch: Rolex Posts: 191	I have and really like both watches. Having said that I would go Daytona, It is my clear favorite. BTW, I actually like not having to set the date when I haven't worn it in a while :)

26 December 2011, 06:45 PM	#13
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,472	i like the gmt more but in your case you should get the daytona. its good to have it in rotation as a luxury watch (especially for 50) since the gmt is still considered a tool watch.

26 December 2011, 06:49 PM	#14
petesjag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: netherlands Posts: 2,177	The daytona Is awsome but i would choose the gmt because its new and would complement your callection better... The gmt Is big and rugged unlike your dj s and subby...

26 December 2011, 07:19 PM	#15
Ear Pain "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: David Location: London Posts: 318	This.....

26 December 2011, 08:57 PM	#17
Solomander "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Joel Location: New York Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 101	I think that the Daytona would complement your current collection. The GMT II is generally similar to the Submariner in appearance. The Daytona would give you a different look and a different vibe.

26 December 2011, 09:00 PM	#18
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	Either way you can't go wrong, both are extremely nice watches. I have both and you may find you eventually do the same as well. For me the GMTIIC is something I wear more often and I wear the Daytona for more special occasions. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

26 December 2011, 09:21 PM	#19
OrangeSport "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Jason Location: Essex, UK Watch: 14060M Posts: 2,943	I would go for the GMT all day long. It just shouts to me when the Daytona doesn't. I prefer buying new too. But, ultimately, you have to decide which grabs you harder.... Nice decision to have to make though! __________________

26 December 2011, 11:35 PM	#20
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	New, new, new, thats the pick! and the GMTIIC is awesome! __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

26 December 2011, 11:39 PM	#21
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,008	For me- Daytona. With that said get whichever one you feel sings to you the most. It doesn't matter much what we think as it won't be on our wrists. In the end it is a good place to be though because either way you can't really go wrong. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

26 December 2011, 11:40 PM	#22
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Depends on what functions you could use. The GMT would be much more easier to read the time.

26 December 2011, 11:45 PM	#23
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Daytona's got my vote.

26 December 2011, 11:54 PM	#24
btrue Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Bill Location: Indianapolis Watch: GMT IIC; PAM 005 Posts: 244	I am not a fan of the Daytona's look, but I have to agree with others who have mentioned that the sub and gmt are very similar and a Daytona would add some diversity to your collection! You will probably be quite pleased with either!

27 December 2011, 12:09 AM	#25
impalass "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: Toronto, Canada. Watch: SD / LV / Daytona Posts: 2,089	Daytona

27 December 2011, 12:39 AM	#26
The Joker "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Gotham Posts: 9,641	Daytona

27 December 2011, 01:15 AM	#27
Jakey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Jake Location: London Watch: SD43 & SS Daytona Posts: 309	The Daytona. It's an amazing watch. I have owned several Rolex's but the Daytona was a whole different feeling. All the best.

27 December 2011, 03:23 AM	#30
impalass "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: Toronto, Canada. Watch: SD / LV / Daytona Posts: 2,089	As a new SS Daytona black dial owner and self confessed timing everything/ anything idiot, yes the Daytona is a pain in the a$$ to read, especially coming from a Speedmaster Pro. It took me around three weeks to get use to the Daytona chrono sweep hand and sub dials, no more reading the timing functions at a glance, it just takes a second or three longer. More time spent taking in the beauty of the dial, lol. I have been a Daytona "fanboy" since the early 70's when AD's could'nt give them away, believe it or not, and of course being an older man now wearing bifocals fulltime may make all the difference.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)