ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Spikedlee · 5 January 2012, 04:17 PM

Wondering if I should do it. I love my sub but I'm thinking about changing things up. I figure if I get a sub again I'd go big and just get a Sub-C, but I don't really want to have both a Sub and a Heritage.

Stengah · 5 January 2012, 04:23 PM

Personally, I would do it. And I have considered it too, but there is just no way that I can let go of this sub, for any reason.

mmmmp · 5 January 2012, 04:25 PM

No, I wouldn't. Keep the Sub and save for the Tudor.

FrankinCA · 5 January 2012, 04:45 PM

My 16610 is not going anywhere.

capote · 5 January 2012, 05:01 PM

Keep and save

tattooedfagin · 5 January 2012, 06:57 PM

Whilst the Tudor Heritage is a fine looking watch i wouldn't flip a Sub Date for one, save your cash & grab a pre-owned one further down the road

sierra11b · 5 January 2012, 07:01 PM

Keep and save. You will find what you want in due time and will have both.

Cru Jones · 5 January 2012, 07:02 PM

well, what are the respective ages and conditions of the pieces? roughly the same? if so, my "feeling" is that you'd need to get more than $1K back, but, i'm not 100% sure.

anywho, i'd have a tough time flipping a watch i "love" for something else just to change things up.

good luck with the choice.

davestan · 5 January 2012, 07:12 PM

Well I wouldn't trade for a Tudor - Rolex Sub will always be a classic(and the feel good wear factor that only a branded Rolex can give). If you love your Sub as you say I'm not sure why you would even be considering this proposition!

blackmsport · 5 January 2012, 07:13 PM

I would

I love Tudor

They make great looking watches

and love this latest

Carlos98326194 · 5 January 2012, 07:50 PM

Plus 1k seems not working on your side. Maybe the negotiation should start at 2k.
Just my 2 cents.

swatty · 5 January 2012, 07:54 PM

I own both and whilst I love the Tudor I wouldn't swap it for the sub

dysondiver · 5 January 2012, 07:56 PM

nope ,,, not me.

dddrees · 5 January 2012, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tattooedfagin

whilst the tudor heritage is a fine looking watch i wouldn't flip a sub date for one, save your cash & grab a pre-owned one further down the road

x2

mailman · 5 January 2012, 09:05 PM

Me...no. But if it makes you happy then why not

humvee · 5 January 2012, 09:29 PM

I would personally have an endoscopy/rectal exam done with a rusted metal rod, than to do the
trade.

Ebruner · 5 January 2012, 10:14 PM

Maybe buy a Tudor if you want, but a Rolex to Tudor trade just seems wrong in my opinion.

-Eddie

MP5 · 5 January 2012, 10:20 PM

And you were so happy about the sub date just not too long ago too.

Adam K. · 5 January 2012, 10:20 PM

Nuh-uh. Get the Tudor later.

padi56 · 5 January 2012, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

well, what are the respective ages and conditions of the pieces? roughly the same? if so, my "feeling" is that you'd need to get more than $1K back, but, i'm not 100% sure.

anywho, i'd have a tough time flipping a watch i "love" for something else just to change things up.

good luck with the choice.

The OP sub is a A serial from 1998/9,and seeing the Tudor Heritage was not launched until Basel 2010, so we can assume the Tudor is almost a brand new watch.

nauticajoe · 5 January 2012, 10:29 PM

I wouldn't do it.

Welshwatchman · 5 January 2012, 11:12 PM

I wouldn't do it but the street prices in the UK puts the A ser. Sub £1,000 ($1550) more than the Tudor.

TSW · 5 January 2012, 11:16 PM

Save up for the Tudor!

Hooper · 5 January 2012, 11:51 PM

Not a chance, unless you need the money !

Michael M. · 5 January 2012, 11:53 PM

Keep & Save IMO

The Tudor will only depreciate

Maxtor · 5 January 2012, 11:55 PM

If he is trading to a re-seller then the re-seller will need to leave room to make money on the resale as well. If I had a Sub I wouldn't trade it ever. Just keep saving for the next watch.

Dan Pierce · 6 January 2012, 12:25 AM

Go after the watch you really want regardless of brand name or what others might think is proper. However, considering the examples in question I'd think the trade should include a few more $$.
dP

Feras · 6 January 2012, 12:27 AM

Noway

mike · 6 January 2012, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Go after the watch you really want regardless of brand name or what others might think is proper. However, considering the examples in question I'd think the trade should include a few more $$.
dP

SWIMPRUF · 6 January 2012, 12:35 AM

Rolex for me...

5 January 2012, 04:17 PM	#1
Spikedlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Chicago, IL Watch: Too many to narrow Posts: 585	Would anyone here trade a Submariner date for a Tudor Heritage + at least $1K in cash Wondering if I should do it. I love my sub but I'm thinking about changing things up. I figure if I get a sub again I'd go big and just get a Sub-C, but I don't really want to have both a Sub and a Heritage.

5 January 2012, 04:45 PM	#4
FrankinCA Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Frank Location: Ventura County Watch: Omega SeMP Chrono Posts: 141	Nope. Sub is my favorite Rolex>>> My 16610 is not going anywhere.

5 January 2012, 06:57 PM	#6
tattooedfagin "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Chad Location: the neighbourhood Watch: 1680 Red Posts: 2,262	Whilst the Tudor Heritage is a fine looking watch i wouldn't flip a Sub Date for one, save your cash & grab a pre-owned one further down the road __________________ SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame

5 January 2012, 07:50 PM	#11
Carlos98326194 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Carlos Location: UK Watch: ing YOU! Posts: 1,121	Plus 1k seems not working on your side. Maybe the negotiation should start at 2k. Just my 2 cents. __________________ 16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B

5 January 2012, 09:05 PM	#15
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	Me...no. But if it makes you happy then why not __________________ JJ

5 January 2012, 04:23 PM	#2
Stengah "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: California Watch: 16610 Posts: 259	Personally, I would do it. And I have considered it too, but there is just no way that I can let go of this sub, for any reason.

5 January 2012, 04:25 PM	#3
mmmmp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Mark P Location: Toronto Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41 Posts: 2,046	No, I wouldn't. Keep the Sub and save for the Tudor.

5 January 2012, 05:01 PM	#5
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	Keep and save

5 January 2012, 07:01 PM	#7
sierra11b "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: California Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50 Posts: 1,966	Keep and save. You will find what you want in due time and will have both.

5 January 2012, 07:02 PM	#8
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	well, what are the respective ages and conditions of the pieces? roughly the same? if so, my "feeling" is that you'd need to get more than $1K back, but, i'm not 100% sure. anywho, i'd have a tough time flipping a watch i "love" for something else just to change things up. good luck with the choice.

5 January 2012, 07:12 PM	#9
davestan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 504	Well I wouldn't trade for a Tudor - Rolex Sub will always be a classic(and the feel good wear factor that only a branded Rolex can give). If you love your Sub as you say I'm not sure why you would even be considering this proposition!

5 January 2012, 07:13 PM	#10
blackmsport Banned Join Date: May 2009 Location: Melb - Australia Posts: 2,959	I would I love Tudor They make great looking watches and love this latest

5 January 2012, 07:54 PM	#12
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	I own both and whilst I love the Tudor I wouldn't swap it for the sub

5 January 2012, 07:56 PM	#13
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	nope ,,, not me.

5 January 2012, 09:29 PM	#16
humvee Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 451	I would personally have an endoscopy/rectal exam done with a rusted metal rod, than to do the trade. Attached Images

5 January 2012, 10:14 PM	#17
Ebruner "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Eddie Location: Kentucky Watch: 118208 Posts: 2,510	Maybe buy a Tudor if you want, but a Rolex to Tudor trade just seems wrong in my opinion. -Eddie __________________

5 January 2012, 10:20 PM	#18
MP5 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: ATX Posts: 2,886	And you were so happy about the sub date just not too long ago too.

5 January 2012, 10:20 PM	#19
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	Nuh-uh. Get the Tudor later.

5 January 2012, 10:29 PM	#21
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	I wouldn't do it.

5 January 2012, 11:12 PM	#22
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	I wouldn't do it but the street prices in the UK puts the A ser. Sub £1,000 ($1550) more than the Tudor. __________________ ..33

5 January 2012, 11:16 PM	#23
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Save up for the Tudor! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

5 January 2012, 11:51 PM	#24
Hooper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Tony Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: 16610 Posts: 3,290	Not a chance, unless you need the money !

5 January 2012, 11:53 PM	#25
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Keep & Save IMO The Tudor will only depreciate

5 January 2012, 11:55 PM	#26
Maxtor 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Max Location: Toronto Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo Posts: 2,472	If he is trading to a re-seller then the re-seller will need to leave room to make money on the resale as well. If I had a Sub I wouldn't trade it ever. Just keep saving for the next watch.

6 January 2012, 12:25 AM	#27
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,216	Go after the watch you really want regardless of brand name or what others might think is proper. However, considering the examples in question I'd think the trade should include a few more $$. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

6 January 2012, 12:27 AM	#28
Feras Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Feras Location: Bahrain Watch: Rolex,Tag Posts: 1,923	Noway

6 January 2012, 12:35 AM	#30
SWIMPRUF "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: * Posts: 2,323	Rolex for me... __________________ Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)