ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 August 2007, 02:51 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 151
|
best setting for watch winder?
Hey just wondering cause I just recently picked up a new watch winder...It has 4 settings, and want to know which is the best setting so my watches do not get overwound? Or does it not really matter?
A. Rotate 33 seconds rest 12 minutes B. Rotate 10 minutes, rest 90 minutes C. Rotate 30 minutes, rest 3 hours. D. Rotate 1 hour, rest 3 hours. Thanks in advance! |
26 August 2007, 02:54 AM | #2 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
A rolex cannot get overwound. It has some kind of protection mechanism that protects the spring from getting overwound
|
26 August 2007, 02:59 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 151
|
Cool, so basically it doesnt really matter what setting it's on?
|
26 August 2007, 03:01 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
If you would have a very complicated watch like a Patek Philippe or IWC perpetual calendar, a watch winder comes in handy so that you do not have to adjust the whole calendar if the watch has stopped. But for a Rolex where you would only have to adjust the date, I do not believe you need a watch winder. So I would just let it stop and give it a full 40 windings before wearing it again. You can read more in the FAQ's, section "Winding setting your watch". here is the link: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=8478 (scroll a bit down) A long term "rest" of the watch would definately NOT harm the watch! Modern watch lubrication oils are synthetic and would not dry out like the oils used in older watches. When you are wearing your watch, the parts are actually being exposed to WEAR AND TEAR. And if you are keeping the watch constantly moving on a watch winder, this means even MORE wear and tear. Therefore a watch winder has no positive effect on the watch whatsoever, but is a mere practical device to keep it going.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
26 August 2007, 03:03 AM | #5 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
|
26 August 2007, 03:08 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
You will have to find the manufacturers instructions on this, because different movements need different amounts of winding. Automatic movements, in general, cannot be over-wound as they have a clutch to prevent this. On the other hand, most manufacturers or the winder manufacturers will post different winding regimes for each movement. I suggest you ask for their instructions.
|
26 August 2007, 03:15 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 151
|
Cool, thanks for the good info its much appreciated...Good post SD that link is very informative.
Thanks again! |
26 August 2007, 04:29 AM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Based on some quick fuzzy math, and the estimated number of rotations your winder might give when on.... and the estimated 900 rotations per 24 hrs it takes to fully wind a Rolex..
I would pick either b or c..........and probably b for minimum affect to the watch. No, you cannot "overwind" your Rolex. However, I am not a winder fan....I see no point in wearing out a half dozen watches all at the same rate..... |
26 August 2007, 04:35 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 151
|
Thank you very much Bush!...I mean tool hehe...The winder is pretty neat, Garinin makes it and for under 100 bucks I highly reccomend it...It makes no noise and has 4 settings...Search garinin on amazon and youll find it...It was a good little buy!
|
26 August 2007, 07:17 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 265
|
Quote:
Thanks |
|
27 August 2007, 10:40 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
However, I think I'll take my sub and SD off the winders since they are both quickset dates. Ron
__________________
1992 TT GMT II (E) with Luminova upgrade 2004 TT GMT II (U) with slate Serti dial 2006 Sea-Dweller (R) 2007 TT Sub (Z) with slate Serti dial 2004 Breitling Emergency Ti w/Blue dial and co-pilot module |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.