ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
3 March 2012, 05:34 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dusseldorf
Posts: 38
|
Explorer 1 - 36mm or 39mm?
Which one do you prefer between the 36mm and 39mm? I can't decide.
|
3 March 2012, 05:35 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Welcome. I like the 36mm better, but why not try both on and see what YOU like.
__________________
TRF member #917 |
3 March 2012, 05:49 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Smaller wrist=36mm, bigger wrist=39mm...............I have smaller wrists, so I prefer the 36mm one.......but remember, IMHO, a Rolex/Tudor oyster cased watch wears bigger than its specs. Try them on.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
3 March 2012, 05:52 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
i like the proportions of the 36mm better
|
3 March 2012, 05:55 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 949
|
Have a 36 myself, so I probably want a 39 more, lol.
|
3 March 2012, 05:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: East Lansing MI
Watch: 114270,5508,124060
Posts: 562
|
I got the 36mm and love it! As Dr. Bob and Wolfgang said, the watch does wear larger than what the specs will make you believe. This is due to it having a thin bezel, 20mm lug space and fairly large dial. Go to an AD and try them both.
|
3 March 2012, 06:01 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 136
|
You should definitely try on both, and ascertain which you prefer.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 16610 TT Rolex Yachtmaster 16622 SS/PL Rolex Explorer II 16570 SS Polar |
3 March 2012, 06:09 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: WA state
Watch: EXP 39mm
Posts: 278
|
I bought the 39mm because I liked the 3,6,9 look better. They are both very nice watches
|
3 March 2012, 06:15 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dusseldorf
Posts: 38
|
I am wearing a PAM 111 now so I am leaning towards the 39mm based on the size alone however my question is more regarding the other differences ... white numbers vs silver, etc.
Thanks for the welcome and advice so far!!!!!!! |
3 March 2012, 06:26 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Erling
Location: Iceland
Watch: Sub and TT DJ
Posts: 748
|
I bought the 39mm and I like it.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
3 March 2012, 06:44 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
I actually like them both equally...
|
3 March 2012, 07:54 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Alin
Location: Italy
Posts: 604
|
They are both nice, but 39mm version looks better IMO.
|
3 March 2012, 07:55 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
39.
|
3 March 2012, 07:59 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
39 but both are a bit small nowadays.
|
3 March 2012, 08:27 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Adam
Location: NYC
Posts: 280
|
Like both, but if had to pick 39.
__________________
16610 16610LV 116610LV 16622 116710 216570 |
3 March 2012, 08:31 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
39....
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
3 March 2012, 08:35 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
I still prefer the 36:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.