Wheres the new updated SEA-DWELLER 4000 ?

[Lagunatic]

Wheres the new updated SEA-DWELLER 4000 ?

[Melanotaenia]

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

[Lagunatic]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

[Lanfor]

Originally Posted by melanotaenia

at the ad; it's called the dssd

x2

[Lagunatic]

I think i will stick with my Casio this year.





Photos shot from Vista Del Sol Drive, Laguna Beach, California.
Photo of Salt Creek Beach and Ritz Carlton Resort, Dana Point, Ca. 3/4/2012

[A.J.R.]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

aye

[kilyung]

It got kidnapped by the Tudor guys and rebadged the Pelagos!

[gwalker]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

Just because it shares a little bit of the name doesn't mean anything. You ever seen a Chevy Corvair.......

[mike]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

[Lagunatic]

Tudor Pelagos looks like a really nice watch, maybe i can buy it in Japan.
http://www.tudorwatch.com/

[CAPDSSD]

Originally Posted by gwalker

Just because it shares a little bit of the name doesn't mean anything.

That applies to the updated Submariner too?

I mean, I kind of see your point, but not in the same direction I'm afraid. I consider the DSSD an improvement upon the SD. Just like the SD4000 was an improvement upon the SD2000 - although, come to think of it, maybe some would argue this as well.

[dukerules]

The 16600 is perfection. There are plenty out there, just buy one, and be a happy man forever.

[Melanotaenia]

Originally Posted by gwalker

Just because it shares a little bit of the name doesn't mean anything. You ever seen a Chevy Corvair.......

Come on, the DSSD is obviously the SD replacement; to think that Rolex would revert back to an older design with less depth rating and no ring lock system, and then update the case to modern day is just ludicrous. There is no need for two depth watches in the line like that. The SD was already a pretty slow seller before being discontinued. And my AD says the DSSD is not a fast seller either.

I have a Sea Dweller and I love it. I agree the DSSD is too big for me and I would never buy one. However, that is pretty much the watch you are left with if you want a serious diver watch that out-performs the ratings on the Sumbariner.

Besides, they've been too busy putting together that Sky-Dweller abomination

[Lagunatic]

Originally Posted by dukerules

The 16600 is perfection. There are plenty out there, just buy one, and be a happy man forever.

I owned a Sea-Dweller 4000 for over 16 years until the idiots at Ben Bridge Jewelers messed it up, they put a nice big dent in the watch. I had to send the watch to Rolex Dallas service center to straighten things out. Rolex Dallas did a nice job. I was so fed up i sold the watch.

[Lagunatic]

Tudor Pelagos in titanium looks good, i think it will resist dents much better than stainless steel. I think.

[liuk3]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD

I posted the same answer in another thread. Was wondering when the OP was going to ask the question again about the SD 4000.

[thlax]

[Adam K.]

This guy and his Casio..!

[gwalker]

Originally Posted by Adam K.

This guy and his Casio..!

I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Look up some of his previous posts and see his others.

[thlax]

Originally Posted by gwalker

I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Look up some of his previous posts and see his others.

I dont think hes laughing at the Casio, more so that the Casio was used as a response to the OP. I am only as right as you though, im not him! Who knows....

[snaggle]

Originally Posted by Melanotaenia

at the AD; it's called the DSSD