ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 March 2012, 12:28 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 57
|
What's the future of random serial #'s
What's the future of random serial #'s, If I am buying or selling a watch and it's sporting an M serial, it's a 2007. What about those new random serials, do you need to contact rolex for manufacturing info?
|
12 March 2012, 12:42 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I don't think that Rolex is ever going to reveal that information.
So far, they have not. The information regarding serial numbers and date of manufacture on the internet are educated guesses made by those who follow Rolex very closely and they are not absolute by any means. Here's some info: http://watchmakingblog.com/rolex-serial-registry/
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
12 March 2012, 01:35 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
I think the random serial # system was implemented to prevent Ads from having the amount of time a watch sat in the case to be relieved simply by the serial #... When you go to buy or sell in the future, the date on the warranty card or sales receipt is supposed to give an approximate year of the watch... I think this will ultimately prove problematic in future resale...
|
12 March 2012, 02:14 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Quote:
The only way to verify the history of a watch is by the use of original warranty and purchase reciept documentation,once these are lost you will have no way to know anything about a watch with randomized serialization.This situation is going to make for an awful lot of story telling when it comes time to sell random serial pieces without paperwork.I can see a lot of watches being less than a year old in the future and old watches becoming extremely difficult to find. |
|
12 March 2012, 02:18 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
|
12 March 2012, 03:24 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
What would you want to contact Rolex for? They won't tell you anything. |
|
12 March 2012, 05:45 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I think random numbering is here for a very long time, as the possible combinations are nearly astronomical.
I also think that some ADs are as concerned about dating watches as many enthusiasts are. The history of watch numbering really doesn't lend itself well to conspiracy theories. The change was just the next logical step in the practice that would ensure a healthy supply of numbers. This is not to say that Rolex did not recognize advantages in the change of the system, but I don't believe that the change was made simply to make the date of manufacture even more cryptic. For at least one model, the random numbering system does a pretty good job of fixing date range of manufacture, that being the 14060M. At the very least, future buyers and sellers will know that these were the last made. For a long time, it will be a riddle many will try to solve.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
12 March 2012, 05:51 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
It’ll make b & p / original receipt more of an issue in the times to come
|
12 March 2012, 06:04 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
How about the clasp code?
|
12 March 2012, 06:35 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
No all these Internet codes could ever tell you like your watch say a M serial. That a case/clasp was stamped sometime between August 2007 and July 2008 nothing more and not necessarily when a watch was made.You guys make far too much of a issue over a case stamp.Watches are not like loafs of bread they have no sale by date and they don't perish and go off if not kept under refrigeration etc.Take movements like the cal 3135 now Rolex must make millions of those,now can assure you they are not made to order for any particular case.With the thousands in stock plus the many hundreds being tested at the COSC and returning form the COSC a movement in any particular case could be older or newer or visa versa only Rolex knows when the movement was made.All we know by some Internet code is a appox date when a case or clasp was stamped and thats it.And all new watches when bought from a AD get the same two year warranty no matter what the case serial is.Myself always buy watches by there condition and we know the randoms started 2011 onward,so base price on condition of watch not by a serial.And posts about the ADs having watches in stock for years,well that might happen on say the slow selling gold models etc.But these Internet codes cannot be relied on as a 100% manufacture date with the slow sellers its that simple.Now in general the fast selling sports Rolex are not at ADs long enough to gather any dust,afraid today the Internet has put far two much importance ,on a case stamp with some now buying a case serial rather than a Rolex watch.And as we all should no by now Rolex watches are good for 50 years no matter what the case stamp is.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 March 2012, 08:55 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Even if Rolex tracked this which they may not, they're not going to help you decode it.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
12 March 2012, 08:57 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
You would think they would have made this random as well. They didn't overlook this tidbit did they?
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
12 March 2012, 11:28 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 57
|
Appreciate the comments!
|
12 March 2012, 11:33 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
|
13 March 2012, 01:36 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
|
Now we need to keep everything complete if we want to resell our randomed Rolex.
|
13 March 2012, 04:58 AM | #16 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
M serials were first seen in very late 2007. This does NOT mean that every M serial was made on that single day or in that single year.. a physical impossibility. Serial prefixes were made and marketed for at least 2 to 4 years...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
13 March 2012, 05:03 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
IMO deciphering Rolex serial numbers is an exercise in futility so I don't understand the obsession with it.
|
13 March 2012, 05:06 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
You are correct. I still see M DD and DJ in cases every now and then. It's still a new watch. These serial number threads crack me up. People are way too anal about this.
|
13 March 2012, 05:09 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
Quote:
Frankly if an AD was going to pluck a decade-old watch out of the case and sell it to me as new, I would be unhappy. Each day it sits in the dealer's case is another day closer to when service is needed. Having a system of numbering was better in my opinion, and conveyed useful information that a smart company would have no interest in hiding. |
|
13 March 2012, 07:19 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
Quote:
|
|
13 March 2012, 09:24 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 57
|
x2
|
13 March 2012, 09:36 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 57
|
|
13 March 2012, 10:42 AM | #23 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
However.... thinking that you can look at a chart made up from Internet guessing, and know when a particular watch was made is just flat wrong... The old charts that are out and about are for research when you do not have any information about a watch at all and choose to make some educated guesses about it.. They are not intended for people to go into Dealers showrooms and challenge them on how old you "think" the watch in the case is...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
14 March 2012, 12:31 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
Even if the serial # does not give an exact age, at the very least we can get a range (even if its within 1-36 months)of when it was made. I feel Rolex has done us a disservice by taking that away from us...
|
14 March 2012, 03:48 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Felipe
Location: Brazil
Watch: ALL rolex models
Posts: 397
|
|
14 March 2012, 04:15 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
How many watches have you seen sitting at any AD long enough to gather even dust especially the SS sports.Its only the slow selling models like say the all gold diamond watches etc.Now these Internet codes cannot in reality be applied to any of the slow selling type watches as many serials overlap in the years.All these Internet codes all they can tell us is a approximation when a case/clasp was stamped nothing more and not when a finished watch was made..And watches don't go off they have no sell by date,and with modern day oils its not a problem to let a watch sit for years but not many are.Now with watches that use the say cal 3135 they make around 600000 of those a year.And they are not all made in the same day week or year.So in any case the movement could be months a year or even older made before its cased.Rolex must have hundreds at the COSC being tested and hundreds returning passed, and the failed movements returned to say re-oiled and sent for testing again.Plus perhaps thousands in stock waiting to be cased, this serial case stuff has been blown well out of proportion by the Internet today.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
14 March 2012, 05:06 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,417
|
Clearly Rolex made the move to go with non-sequential serial numbering system to gain advantage in their own manufacturing, distribution and supply chain strategy.
I cannot conceive any reason that ROLEX would want consumers or even ADs to understand the underpinnings for the ROLEX serial number strategy. It stands to reason that for ROLEX models that are in production over many years, one will have no way to discern the date when a case or movement is made once it is separated from its ownership papers and warranty card. Even with the papers and warranty card, the actual date of manufacture is unclear and imprecise. So, unless the design is changed (or there is some manufacturing flaw), a ROLEX produced this year, will have no discernible difference with one that is produced 10 or even 20 years from now. When you purchase from an AD, how will you know if you are getting NOS? How will you know if your lubricants are 'fresh' ? You won't! ROLEX maintains it will not make any appreciable difference to the serviceability and life of your watch. Every piece receives the same warranty! So, now I am waiting for some technical papers to be published showing the degradation of ROLEX watch movement lubricants for a caliber that is left to sit on a shelf for 5 or even 10 years. Someone on TRF recently reported that they were sold a ROLEX by an AD that may have been in the supply chain for several years before finally being sold for the first time. Who is to know the reasons it lingered for so long? For all the reasons cited above, there was no reason this customer should be unsatisfied with the first time purchase regardless of the born-on date. The watch is still under a 2- year warranty from date of original purchase. And it has been said that, if a watch is properly serviced (at the cost to the consumer), it will last for years. But I think the real question is, might the lifetime service cost to the consumer be higher, if it is originally sold as NOS with older, possibly degraded lubricants when first sold? Should ROLEX therefore introduce some policy as it relates to the sale of ROLEX with non-sequential serial numbers, that these should not be sold by an AD after a period of more than 5 years or even 10 years (fill in the blank), without first being returned to ROLEX for a caliber lubrication? I think these are legitimate questions...
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
14 March 2012, 06:41 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
As I've said before, I believe that the reason is purely mathematical, with regard to maintaining a system of numbering that will provide a series of fresh "alphanumeric identifiers" well into the future, after having gone through numbers only and then to a simple letter-first alphanumeric system.
Of course, that's just my opinion and as always, Rolex is not talking.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
14 March 2012, 07:23 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Since Rolex have introduced new semisynthetic lubricants in their manufacture I don`t think "shelftime" is a significant factor that requires consumer awareness in quite the manner that some seem to imagine.Newer lubricants do not "dry up" the way older style lubricants did.
The bottom line is still that a new watch is "new" as of the date of sale,not manufacture.A new watch is not like a car that comes with a date code within the VIN ,the warranty of a Rolex is "triggered" on the date of sale for a period of two years. |
14 March 2012, 07:23 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
Are you saying that when I am considering my 5-year service date, I can skip counting all the days the watch sat not running?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.