ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

xxthe_remedyxx · 21 April 2012, 01:58 PM

Between the 116610LN SS and the 116613LN TT, which would you choose and why?

dddrees · 21 April 2012, 02:00 PM

116610LN SS, because a simple stainless steel watch goes better with everything in my opinion.

Chatassys · 21 April 2012, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

116610ln ss, because a simple stainless steel watch goes best with everything in my opinion.

x2

Atomant · 21 April 2012, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

116610ln ss, because a simple stainless steel watch goes better with everything in my opinion.

x3

Lagunatic · 21 April 2012, 02:15 PM

116610ln ss

paverman · 21 April 2012, 02:37 PM

X4

Gharddog03 · 21 April 2012, 02:39 PM

X5

SaddleSC · 21 April 2012, 02:42 PM

X6 SS is more versatile IMO

911SC · 21 April 2012, 03:00 PM

I agree with the above in regards to the SS, but there's just something about a TT Submariner whether new or old. Yes it's flashy, eye catching and to some gaudy but a 16613 by right is simply beautiful, a true work of art. not to say that the 16610 is inferior, it is not-just less noticeable. IMO to a concerning eye a Rolex is a Rolex, personally it doesn't matter if it has gold or not, your watch will be noticed regardless. The TT can be worn dressed up or down. I have both watches, I hardly wear my 16610. Maybe I like the attention

Hairdude1 · 21 April 2012, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

116610LN SS, because a simple stainless steel watch goes better with everything in my opinion.

Agreed!

FeelingTheBlues · 21 April 2012, 03:06 PM

TT for me, I'm a yellow gold man so I'm somewhat biased but I think it's just flashy enough when needed while it remains subtle, it's a great mix of colors for an everyday watch but it looks a bit dressier than a regular SS watch in my opinion!

MY-WATCH · 21 April 2012, 03:22 PM

X7 ss

TSW · 21 April 2012, 03:46 PM

X8

Runnin' Rebel · 21 April 2012, 05:53 PM

X9

up2nogood · 21 April 2012, 05:55 PM

Another SS vote. But only because you're limiting to one!

htc8p · 21 April 2012, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by up2nogood

Another SS vote. But only because you're limiting to one!

i say go for the TT but then you have to get another SS model...then again

x10

globalmedia33 · 21 April 2012, 06:16 PM

I would pick the 116610LN, i'm not a fan of TT.

Sam Philip · 21 April 2012, 06:21 PM

Ss

Limey- · 21 April 2012, 06:36 PM

Ss

Andad · 21 April 2012, 06:41 PM

The TT would be my choice for all occasions.

Bangel · 21 April 2012, 06:48 PM

LN for me. More practical, more versatile, less noticeable.

gwalker · 21 April 2012, 06:57 PM

If your only watch SS. If your keeping DSSD get the TT. Not enough difference in the two.

Wristmaster · 21 April 2012, 07:03 PM

SS gets my vote. Steel has all the qualities, its light, not too flshy, goes well with anything. And durable.

jimisaint · 21 April 2012, 07:46 PM

Two Tone.....

kymwatchlog · 21 April 2012, 07:51 PM

if only one then make it a SS. imo TT should not be a one and only watch.

but which sings to u?? this is most impt.

Kingair · 21 April 2012, 07:57 PM

SS

The only way to go ;-)

HANW

Aspirin · 21 April 2012, 07:57 PM

I vote for 116610LN SS.

Director EDTF · 22 April 2012, 12:28 AM

TT for me. Originally it was a toss up between the DSSD and the 116613LN. I went for the DSSD so the next time around I am going for the TT!! A little bit of a different look.

HL65 · 22 April 2012, 12:29 AM

LN SS for me.

Darlinboy · 22 April 2012, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxthe_remedyxx

Between the 116610LN SS and the 116613LN TT, which would you choose and why?

Definitely the stainless. It can dress up or dress down, looks great with everything. And... I'm not a huge fan of TT.

21 April 2012, 01:58 PM	#1
xxthe_remedyxx "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: George Location: NYC Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,105	If you could only have one... Between the 116610LN SS and the 116613LN TT, which would you choose and why?

21 April 2012, 02:00 PM	#2
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	116610LN SS, because a simple stainless steel watch goes better with everything in my opinion. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

21 April 2012, 02:42 PM	#8
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	X6 SS is more versatile IMO __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

21 April 2012, 03:06 PM	#11
FeelingTheBlues "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Carl Location: Always moving Watch: If you wish... Posts: 22,039	TT for me, I'm a yellow gold man so I'm somewhat biased but I think it's just flashy enough when needed while it remains subtle, it's a great mix of colors for an everyday watch but it looks a bit dressier than a regular SS watch in my opinion! __________________ Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin

21 April 2012, 03:46 PM	#13
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	X8 __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

21 April 2012, 02:15 PM	#5
Lagunatic Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Ron Location: Laguna Niguel, Ca Watch: Rolex 116613LN Posts: 1,724	116610ln ss

21 April 2012, 02:37 PM	#6
paverman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Ken Location: Illinois Watch: Too many Posts: 2,870	X4

21 April 2012, 02:39 PM	#7
Gharddog03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Genaro Location: Fresno Ca. Watch: R O L E X Posts: 4,466	X5

21 April 2012, 03:00 PM	#9
911SC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Chicago/Michigan Watch: 16623 YM40 Posts: 1,305	I agree with the above in regards to the SS, but there's just something about a TT Submariner whether new or old. Yes it's flashy, eye catching and to some gaudy but a 16613 by right is simply beautiful, a true work of art. not to say that the 16610 is inferior, it is not-just less noticeable. IMO to a concerning eye a Rolex is a Rolex, personally it doesn't matter if it has gold or not, your watch will be noticed regardless. The TT can be worn dressed up or down. I have both watches, I hardly wear my 16610. Maybe I like the attention

21 April 2012, 03:22 PM	#12
MY-WATCH "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Sala hu din Location: N/A Posts: 1,782	X7 ss

21 April 2012, 05:53 PM	#14
Runnin' Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: 🤔 Posts: 8,424	X9 __________________ ♛

21 April 2012, 05:55 PM	#15
up2nogood "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Alex Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: Idiot Savant Posts: 1,944	Another SS vote. But only because you're limiting to one!

21 April 2012, 06:16 PM	#17
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	I would pick the 116610LN, i'm not a fan of TT. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

21 April 2012, 06:21 PM	#18
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	Ss

21 April 2012, 06:36 PM	#19
Limey- "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Nick Location: WA Watch: Your Six Posts: 477	Ss

21 April 2012, 06:41 PM	#20
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,533	The TT would be my choice for all occasions. __________________ E

21 April 2012, 06:48 PM	#21
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	LN for me. More practical, more versatile, less noticeable.

21 April 2012, 06:57 PM	#22
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	If your only watch SS. If your keeping DSSD get the TT. Not enough difference in the two.

21 April 2012, 07:03 PM	#23
Wristmaster "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: A.K.W Location: Indonesia Watch: Me Watching U Posts: 587	SS gets my vote. Steel has all the qualities, its light, not too flshy, goes well with anything. And durable.

21 April 2012, 07:46 PM	#24
jimisaint "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Jimi Location: New York Watch: 16710, PAM 50, IWC Posts: 223	Two Tone..... __________________ 16710LN, 16613TLN, PAM 50, IWC Spitfire Chrono

21 April 2012, 07:51 PM	#25
kymwatchlog Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: US Posts: 853	if only one then make it a SS. imo TT should not be a one and only watch. but which sings to u?? this is most impt.

21 April 2012, 07:57 PM	#26
Kingair "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA Watch: Not enough ;-) Posts: 21,232	SS The only way to go ;-) HANW

21 April 2012, 07:57 PM	#27
Aspirin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: at home Posts: 1,330	I vote for 116610LN SS.

22 April 2012, 12:28 AM	#28
Director EDTF 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Nelson Location: Central, NJ Posts: 2,466	TT for me. Originally it was a toss up between the DSSD and the 116613LN. I went for the DSSD so the next time around I am going for the TT!! A little bit of a different look.

22 April 2012, 12:29 AM	#29
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,008	LN SS for me. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)