ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Joeohio · 2 May 2012, 11:58 PM

As I debate moving the entire collection and getting 1 WG DDII I was wondering if there is any difference in the Total Cost of Ownership with a Gold watch vs. SS?
Movement's Service cost should be the same correct?
Newer Bracelets shouldn't stretch and last as long as the SS versions? Could they last a lifetime?

Any thoughts or experiences are appreciated!

kilyung · 3 May 2012, 12:00 AM

With proper care, there should be little to no ownership cost delta between full gold and steel.

chicfarmer1 · 3 May 2012, 12:10 AM

Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

krlyuzh · 3 May 2012, 12:11 AM

Actually, the service (through Rolex Service Center) will be more than service for a SS model. On average, I believe it is about $800 for DD, though I cannot speak for a DDII.

Will it last a lifetime? Well, anything could if taken care of properly. However, if you compare SS vs 18KT, SS will always win, especially Rolex SS. It is well known that Rolex uses a better grade of steel for their watches than other brands. white gold is white gold though. 18kt has about 75% pure gold and 25% alloys. What that means is that it is soft. It will scratch, it will get thinner over the years. So, the short answer is that SS will last longer vs the 18kt if worn exactly the same.

Keeperoftime · 3 May 2012, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicfarmer1

Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

+1

rr-nyc · 3 May 2012, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicfarmer1

don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

+2

kcmo · 3 May 2012, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicfarmer1

Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

What great advice!

SaddleSC · 3 May 2012, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicfarmer1

Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

I LOVE this post...perfect answer.

gwalker · 3 May 2012, 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krlyuzh

Actually, the service (through Rolex Service Center) will be more than service for a SS model. On average, I believe it is about $800 for DD, though I cannot speak for a DDII.

Will it last a lifetime? Well, anything could if taken care of properly. However, if you compare SS vs 18KT, SS will always win, especially Rolex SS. It is well known that Rolex uses a better grade of steel for their watches than other brands. white gold is white gold though. 18kt has about 75% pure gold and 25% alloys. What that means is that it is soft. It will scratch, it will get thinner over the years. So, the short answer is that SS will last longer vs the 18kt if worn exactly the same.

DDs are more because of the added complications, not the metal they are made of. A SS Daytona is $800+ Services on all gold models arent more to service. Take good care of it and it will last a LONG time.

Kingair · 3 May 2012, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicfarmer1

Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

I was never into gold until I noticed my DD . . .
And just got my YG President . . . finally . . .

I do servicing at an Independent Watchmaker . . . . around $ 250.00 . . . without extra's . . . ;-)

HAGOne

cocopeep · 3 May 2012, 02:50 AM

Mabye more money for insurance.

tkerrmd · 3 May 2012, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeohio

As I debate moving the entire collection and getting 1 WG DDII I was wondering if there is any difference in the Total Cost of Ownership with a Gold watch vs. SS?
Movement's Service cost should be the same correct?
Newer Bracelets shouldn't stretch and last as long as the SS versions? Could they last a lifetime?

Any thoughts or experiences are appreciated!

no

mgent · 3 May 2012, 05:07 AM

Insurance shouldn't be much more, if you are comparing to a collection of other watches with equal value...

jnkay · 3 May 2012, 12:04 PM

You should get what you want, but to answer your question, the cost of owning the gold watch will be greater than ss if your taste or circumstances change and you decide to sell it. The gold models depreciate more than ss models if you buy new.

Rollie021 · 3 May 2012, 01:25 PM

I love my wg ddii.. I sold a few watches to get it and have no regrets!!! Not to flashy like the yg and the weight is excellent!!

Hairdude1 · 3 May 2012, 01:45 PM

Good info on service charges!

2 May 2012, 11:58 PM	#1
Joeohio "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: USA Posts: 71	Rolex Gold Cost of Ownership compared to... As I debate moving the entire collection and getting 1 WG DDII I was wondering if there is any difference in the Total Cost of Ownership with a Gold watch vs. SS? Movement's Service cost should be the same correct? Newer Bracelets shouldn't stretch and last as long as the SS versions? Could they last a lifetime? Any thoughts or experiences are appreciated!

3 May 2012, 12:00 AM	#2
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	With proper care, there should be little to no ownership cost delta between full gold and steel.

3 May 2012, 12:10 AM	#3
chicfarmer1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: J Location: USA Midwest Watch: Midsize Datejust Posts: 2,611	Don't overthink this. Get what you enjoy. Nothing is permanent, not even your taste.

3 May 2012, 12:11 AM	#4
krlyuzh 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Kirill Location: USA Posts: 11,932	Actually, the service (through Rolex Service Center) will be more than service for a SS model. On average, I believe it is about $800 for DD, though I cannot speak for a DDII. Will it last a lifetime? Well, anything could if taken care of properly. However, if you compare SS vs 18KT, SS will always win, especially Rolex SS. It is well known that Rolex uses a better grade of steel for their watches than other brands. white gold is white gold though. 18kt has about 75% pure gold and 25% alloys. What that means is that it is soft. It will scratch, it will get thinner over the years. So, the short answer is that SS will last longer vs the 18kt if worn exactly the same.

3 May 2012, 02:50 AM	#11
cocopeep "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: PA Watch: DJ 116234 Posts: 510	Mabye more money for insurance.

3 May 2012, 05:07 AM	#13
mgent "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Chicago / Boca Posts: 361	Insurance shouldn't be much more, if you are comparing to a collection of other watches with equal value...

3 May 2012, 12:04 PM	#14
jnkay "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: South Florida, US Watch: du jour Posts: 1,815	You should get what you want, but to answer your question, the cost of owning the gold watch will be greater than ss if your taste or circumstances change and you decide to sell it. The gold models depreciate more than ss models if you buy new.

3 May 2012, 01:25 PM	#15
Rollie021 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Michigan USA Posts: 37	I love my wg ddii.. I sold a few watches to get it and have no regrets!!! Not to flashy like the yg and the weight is excellent!!

3 May 2012, 01:45 PM	#16
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Good info on service charges!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)