The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 May 2012, 12:28 AM   #1
shay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: israel
Watch: AP panda+daytona s
Posts: 50
AP 15300 or AP 15400

hi guys
i want to buy new AP,
i don't know which model to buy.
today at the store i tried the 15300 And suddenly it looks small to me because I got used to my roo panda...
What do you think would be more in demand? the 15300 because Stop producing it? or the 15400 because it new Collection and because The tendency today is big watches?
I have a price of 11500$ for the 15300 from AD of AP.
this is good price or can i argue more? about 10000-10500$?
the 15400 is 500-700$ more
thank you
shay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:31 AM   #2
S``
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
10k -10.5k for a mint/lnib from grey... not BNIB from AD...

the RO will always be a 39mm in my mind... leave the bigger diameters to the ROOs. But what do I know... I'd say it looks like your mind is on the 15400... go with whatever you think look best on you.
S`` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:33 AM   #3
Ristretto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: GMT + 3
Watch: Platinum Daytona
Posts: 1,322
15300.
__________________
“What the mind can conceive, it can achieve.” – Napoleon Hill
Ristretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:46 AM   #4
shay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: israel
Watch: AP panda+daytona s
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Szer View Post
10k -10.5k for a mint/lnib from grey... not BNIB from AD...

the RO will always be a 39mm in my mind... leave the bigger diameters to the ROOs. But what do I know... I'd say it looks like your mind is on the 15400... go with whatever you think look best on you.
AD gave me price 11500$,
and i'm talk about BNIB. not LNIB. But I thought to myself, when I would be in the store with cash I can ask for a discount of several dollars off
shay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:50 AM   #5
S``
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by shay View Post
AD gave me price 11500$,
and i'm talk about BNIB. not LNIB. But I thought to myself, when I would be in the store with cash I can ask for a discount of several dollars off
I think that's a reasonable request

have fun trying on and deciding... don't worry about which one will be more in demand in the future... tastes change and it could go either way (bigger or smaller)
S`` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 01:05 AM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Personally I prefer the 15300. It wears a little bigger than its 39mm suggest. The ROOs at 42mm, now 44mm, wear pretty big (even relative Panerai). It entirely depends on what you're looking for. If you want a big watch, get another ROO (maybe a Diver?). If you're looking for something with a little class, then the 15300 is a great choice. Nothing against the 15400 but I'm not sold on the new dial (although it works great for the Jumbo) and size.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 01:16 AM   #7
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
I just got a 15300 a bit ago, and the 39mm size works just fine for me. Ultimately you need to get the one that works best for you, don't worry about which one works for everybody else.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 03:55 AM   #8
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Definitely the classic 15300
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 10:09 AM   #9
Darlinboy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Darlinboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,703
Admittedly biased, since I just bought one, but the 15300 is a great watch.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Darlinboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 10:19 AM   #10
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
15300 for me too.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 11:49 AM   #11
DucS2R
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 135
It never hurts to argue for a few more dollars off, but IMHO, that is a good price from an AD. I paid more for mine last year in the US from an AD, though I still got a decent discount.

T
DucS2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 11:52 AM   #12
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
15300 gets my vote...for now. Would love to try on the 15400 though. Have to wait until September though...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:07 PM   #13
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
I love both. IMHO pick the one that suits you best. I think you will have a month long smile either way.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:13 PM   #14
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Easy for me - the 15300. Just find some side by side photos online between the two and look at the placement of the date window of the 15400. Since they used the same Cal 3120 movement they were forced to move it closer to center. Looks completely wrong to me. Scope up a 15300 while you can.

I had a 15300.OR - probably the nicest watch I have or ever will own.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:34 PM   #15
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
That's already a great price. I'd say go with the 15300 like mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Watches are the new currency!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2012, 12:37 PM   #16
rossi46
2024 Pledge Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Just find some side by side photos online between the two and look at the placement of the date window of the 15400. Since they used the same Cal 3120 movement they were forced to move it closer to center. Looks completely wrong to me
AGREED!

I also don't like the changes to the 12 o'clock position - yes, I know the double marker is reminiscent of the Jumbo, but there was just something awesome about the large "AP" up top. The seconds-hand doesn't look as good, either.

15300 all the way.

One day... one day...
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2012, 11:09 PM   #17
Eeyore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Eeyore
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Easy for me - the 15300. Just find some side by side photos online between the two and look at the placement of the date window of the 15400. Since they used the same Cal 3120 movement they were forced to move it closer to center. Looks completely wrong to me. Scope up a 15300 while you can.

I had a 15300.OR - probably the nicest watch I have or ever will own.
Absolutely agree the case of the 15400 is too big for the 3120 movement. Not only is the date too far inboard but the movement looks too small in the back of the watch.

Actually I am guessing that the 3120 was probably designed originally for a 36 mm case as the date looks in the right place in the 15450.
Eeyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2012, 05:30 PM   #18
Hsiang613
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Artesia, CA
Posts: 40
I have a 15300ST still brand new in the box... is it worth selling it right now? I'm thinking about getting a ROO instead...
Hsiang613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2012, 05:39 PM   #19
Dickson Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Dickson Lim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
15300 for me. It would better to go with the Diver if you opted the 41mm size. Just my 2cents.
__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible!
Dickson Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2012, 05:40 PM   #20
Dickson Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Dickson Lim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hsiang613 View Post
I have a 15300ST still brand new in the box... is it worth selling it right now? I'm thinking about getting a ROO instead...
We don't recommend selling here, we just ENABLE people to buy more.

__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible!
Dickson Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2012, 05:58 PM   #21
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dickson Lim View Post
We don't recommend selling here, we just ENABLE people to buy more.

__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 07:00 AM   #22
herbie911
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 445
Personally, I prefer the dial on the 15300. I like having AP at the 12 o'clock position.
herbie911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 07:15 AM   #23
LAJM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Larry
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 270
15300 for me without a doubt...in white dial looks great on the wrist and for me is the dress watch.
LAJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 07:50 AM   #24
Hsiang613
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Artesia, CA
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dickson Lim View Post
15300 for me. It would better to go with the Diver if you opted the 41mm size. Just my 2cents.
I thought the Divers r 44mm??
Hsiang613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 09:30 AM   #25
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hsiang613 View Post
I thought the Divers r 44mm??
42mm
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 12:07 PM   #26
Hsiang613
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Artesia, CA
Posts: 40
15300

Hsiang613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 07:57 PM   #27
Eeyore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Eeyore
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 113
A quick question - does the bracelet of the 15300 have a micro adjustment, or is removing or adding links the only form of adjustment?
Eeyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 08:01 PM   #28
Adam K.
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeyore View Post
A quick question - does the bracelet of the 15300 have a micro adjustment, or is removing or adding links the only form of adjustment?

No microadjustment--you just remove or add links to get the fit you need. A half-link is available as well, and can be helpful to some Royal Oak wearers.
Adam K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 09:02 PM   #29
Eeyore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Eeyore
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam K. View Post
No microadjustment--you just remove or add links to get the fit you need. A half-link is available as well, and can be helpful to some Royal Oak wearers.
Thanks.
Eeyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2012, 11:42 PM   #30
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam K. View Post
No microadjustment--you just remove or add links to get the fit you need. A half-link is available as well, and can be helpful to some Royal Oak wearers.
It's actually a 1.5 link.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.