ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 May 2012, 03:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Sea Dweller 16600 Urgent Questions!!
Hi Members,
I went to a Watch&Clock fair yesterday (Nr Birmingham, UK), sold my Sub 16610 and purchased a Z serial SD 16600 from a dealer there. I got home happy with my new watch and started to research it...Ok, this is when I start getting nervous..Despite the bracelet reference being 93160A and the clasp code being OP4 and these same ref numbers and letters can be found on the inside edge of the SELs I realised that the links of the bracelet are the same size as my sub ND 93150 bracelet..Is this right or should the SD bracelet be of a thicker/chunkier build?? I sent the dealer the same queries and he reckoned that mine is correct.. (he has offered me a full refund if I'm still not happy). What do the SD experts say?? |
15 May 2012, 03:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
The SD bracelet is ref 93160 and is basically the same as on the 16610 subs,main difference polished sides and the interchangeable extension link bracelet looks correct.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
15 May 2012, 03:12 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Looks great, enjoy
|
15 May 2012, 03:38 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Hey thanks guys - I'm feeling much better now (my "this is a frankenwatch" neurosis was getting the better of me!)
|
15 May 2012, 03:56 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
|
You have nothing to worry.
Here are pics to show. |
15 May 2012, 04:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Looks good. Also on the SD on the 6 o'clock side the nearest link to clasp is a full link instead of half link.
|
15 May 2012, 04:07 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
|
Looks good but it's always a worry when you come across something unexpectedly and need to make a decision on the spot unless, of course, you've been researching it in advance or have a photographic memory.
I've started to keep a little file in my i-phone of things to look out for - just in case.... Would love to see some pics of the face |
15 May 2012, 04:09 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 257
|
Gorgeous watch :)
|
15 May 2012, 04:18 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
|
great upgrade, everything looks good enjoy it
__________________
PP Geneva |
15 May 2012, 04:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Here are some pics!
|
15 May 2012, 04:26 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
PS - I've got to say that I am missing my Sub Date which has the Cyclops and had the lug holes which made it SO much easier to swap straps..
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.