The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 August 2012, 01:38 AM   #1
vernest
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Watch: 1951 Bubbleback
Posts: 6
about the 5512 Submariner

Hi, nice to be a part of your website . My question is that my wife recently purchased a 1962 Submariner for our anniversary . Although the movement is alleged to be a 1560 ( I haven't opened the case) , the face is 2 line instead of the 4 that is hallmark . Could it be that early 1962 in the production of the Subs with the 1560 , they had not sent them off to be certified ? It seems odd since the reason for the upgrade in movement was to create a 2 model choice for the buyer , either the 5513 and it's 1530 or the Official Chronometer model . I will take it into my local Rolex guy to trace the serial number and see for sure , but I was just curious to ask you all . There is a stamp 5512 on the case in between the lugs at the 12o'clock position ....
vernest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2012, 06:05 AM   #2
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
I'm not sure if this answers your question or not. It is not uncommon to have 5512's in the two line version as well as the four line version. In addition, while I believe the 1530 movement, for the most part, is/was considered a non chronometer movement, examples of chronometer rated watches have surfaced in the past powered with the 1530 movement.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2012, 11:45 PM   #3
vernest
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Watch: 1951 Bubbleback
Posts: 6
than you , that helps
vernest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2012, 12:24 AM   #4
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
Sub Gift....

Quote:
Originally Posted by vernest View Post
Hi, nice to be a part of your website . My question is that my wife recently purchased a 1962 Submariner for our anniversary. . .
Enough said, your wife is a saint, consider yourself a very fortunate individual....
You should buy her a new BMW convertible....
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2012, 01:51 AM   #5
drainaps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by vernest View Post
Hi, nice to be a part of your website . My question is that my wife recently purchased a 1962 Submariner for our anniversary .
..........
Gentlemen,

This is, beyond doubt, proof of the existence of God.

To the OP : Can I send my wife over for a crash course on "Gifting for the Watch Enthusiast 101"? All expenses covered plus a reasonable fee paid on top! Any Research Material needed (ideally 1950-70 Subs) covered too.

Miracles do occur after all...... How am I supposed to sleep now ? Holy cow!
drainaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2012, 03:00 AM   #6
StuartM1970
"TRF" Member
 
StuartM1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Stuart
Location: Dubai
Watch: IWC Mark XV
Posts: 280
Where do you find this kind of wife?

_____
Mark XV, 14060M, PAM 372, Seamaster Chronostop
StuartM1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2012, 06:13 AM   #7
vernest
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Watch: 1951 Bubbleback
Posts: 6
I am very lucky

.....I hadn't considered that , but you may have a viable little enterprise idea in the making . I will talk it over with her and get back with you all ....and yes I do treat her very well and appreciate how lucky I am ..
vernest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2012, 05:18 PM   #8
Tim Brennan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21
I purchased a Milgauss today and dropped my 5512 (circa) off for service. The Jeweler stated that my watch should, "Come back nicely."
About a year ago, I was in a reputable shop looking at watches and wearing said 5512. The man at the counter seemed knowledgeable enough, but stated that my watch was really only worth about $500. While I will admit that my 5512 is not the most luxurious or attractive watch in my collection, I was taken aback by the relative worthlessness of this piece. Can anyone explain? I inherited this watch from my father, so regardless of the value on the market, it is priceless to me.
By the way, I'm loving the Milgauss!

Thanks guys
Tim Brennan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2012, 07:40 PM   #9
Kiwinz
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brennan View Post
I purchased a Milgauss today and dropped my 5512 (circa) off for service. The Jeweler stated that my watch should, "Come back nicely."
About a year ago, I was in a reputable shop looking at watches and wearing said 5512. The man at the counter seemed knowledgeable enough, but stated that my watch was really only worth about $500. While I will admit that my 5512 is not the most luxurious or attractive watch in my collection, I was taken aback by the relative worthlessness of this piece. Can anyone explain? I inherited this watch from my father, so regardless of the value on the market, it is priceless to me.
By the way, I'm loving the Milgauss!

Thanks guys
Bugger me, Mate

I would pay You double in a blink., guess someone wanted to make a quick buck with this silly offer.

You have a lovely piece there with Your 5512, I would love one of them.

BTW, Congrats to the Milgauss.
Kiwinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2012, 08:42 PM   #10
Paul
"TRF" Member
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
The $500 valuation ......

The fella is out of touch ..... or a robber - did he offer to buy your tired old 5512 ?

Earlier this month, a well-regarded seller on Vintage Rolex Forum offered a very nice, correct 2 line 5512 for sale at $13,500 (nato strap, box but no papers, recently serviced).
I don't really follow this model but would suggest his price was quite fair.

Obviously, lots of things influence price ( overall condition, correctness of all the parts, any service history, etc, etc).
That said, I don't recall seeing any correct 5512's priced much south of $10k for a long time.

Look after it
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2012, 09:20 PM   #11
high5
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: hong kong
Posts: 300
I think 5512 matt dial is about 7 to 8k depending on the condition and year. It is really in a strange price range. a lot of people would choose the 1665 great white instead at that price range. but then you have the gilt dial, 2 lines etc, those are a lot of more expensive
high5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2012, 10:19 PM   #12
C6MMVI
"TRF" Member
 
C6MMVI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Norm
Location: Florida
Watch: 5512, 105.012
Posts: 73
After lurking on this forum for a very long time and with the help of so many people providing a wealth of information, I recently purchased my grail 5512. A 1.49 (1965) totally original, meters first, matte dial, on an original C&I rivet bracelet.

The watch is 95% and was extremely lucky to find it. I paid $8500 for the watch gladly and looking at prices for the last year from almost every website and forum dealer I could find, thought this was a really good price.

By the way, this is my first post and I am not sure how many posts I will contribute. I guess I will say something when I have something to say, but I did want to take the time to thank everyone in this forum for giving me the knowledge necessary in making my purchase.

I have been part of several other forums for other items and all I can say is this is probably the best forum I have seen. The members truly look out for one another and the knowledge that some of the members have and are willing to share is great.

So, thanks again.
C6MMVI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 07:37 AM   #13
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
You are welcome C6

Sounds like you got an awesome piece, a true Steve McQueen (that was the model he owned).

Anyway some photos would be awesome if you can
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 08:09 AM   #14
C6MMVI
"TRF" Member
 
C6MMVI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Norm
Location: Florida
Watch: 5512, 105.012
Posts: 73
My 5512

Name:  5512 002.jpg
Views: 242
Size:  99.5 KB

Name:  5512 003.jpg
Views: 241
Size:  90.6 KB

Name:  5512 004.jpg
Views: 240
Size:  98.4 KB

Name:  5512 006.jpg
Views: 241
Size:  99.0 KB

Name:  5512 007.jpg
Views: 243
Size:  94.3 KB
C6MMVI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 08:18 AM   #15
T5AUS
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by vernest View Post
Hi, nice to be a part of your website . My question is that my wife recently purchased a 1962 Submariner for our anniversary . Although the movement is alleged to be a 1560 ( I haven't opened the case) , the face is 2 line instead of the 4 that is hallmark . Could it be that early 1962 in the production of the Subs with the 1560 , they had not sent them off to be certified ? It seems odd since the reason for the upgrade in movement was to create a 2 model choice for the buyer , either the 5513 and it's 1530 or the Official Chronometer model . I will take it into my local Rolex guy to trace the serial number and see for sure , but I was just curious to ask you all . There is a stamp 5512 on the case in between the lugs at the 12o'clock position ....
Hi Vernest and welcome.
My understanding on this is that the 5512 was first released with the officially certified chronometer movemement but the dial not marked so. When the 5513 came out it was deemed necessary to mark the dial of the 5512 to distinguish between the 5513 which was not chronometer rated
My 1962 5512 below

T5AUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 10:53 AM   #16
Tim Brennan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21
Well Gents,

Thank you for the input. I originally posted about my 5512 and realized that when I tried to add that it was circa 1969 I failed to do so successfully.
I also wanted to post a picture earlier this afternoon, of the original box and goodies that came with the watch when my father purchased it. He took excellent care of everything and as soon as I figure out how to attach a picture to my posts, I think it would be fun to arrange the watch (after it is returned to me from RSC) in the original box with the anchor, seal, tab, warranty.... you get the idea!
Thanks again.
Tim Brennan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 11:24 AM   #17
vernest
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Watch: 1951 Bubbleback
Posts: 6
to Tim ,, you got to be kidding me .......that watch , regardless of the special significance to you is a flagship in the Rolex line .......that is one true "crack smoker" you were talking to keep that timepiece , it is history ......I spit on his $500 offer
vernest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 11:26 AM   #18
vernest
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Watch: 1951 Bubbleback
Posts: 6
To T5AUS.....that is my baby .....and quite a beaut .......you are lucky indeed ....brilliant in it's elegant beauty ....
vernest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2012, 09:47 PM   #19
Tim Brennan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21
Vernest - Thank you. I thought something was amiss. When it comes back, I will post a photo, as I stated above, in the box with all the original goodies.
I figured out how to attach the photos with little effort last night.

Tim - Out
Tim Brennan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2012, 02:23 AM   #20
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
Looking forward to your pics Tim.

BTW - is the RSC replacing any visible parts?
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.