ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2012, 07:35 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: london
Posts: 5
|
Sea Dweller Trade
About to swap my 16600 from 2008 for a Panerai 243. Straight exchange no money changing hands. Am I doing a good thing or am I about to make a big mistake. Help needed - thank you all.
|
17 September 2012, 07:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well if you want to change go for it we cannot say if it will be a mistake or not, so if you do change any mistake is down to you..
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
17 September 2012, 07:42 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Hans Henrik
Location: EU, Denmark
Posts: 184
|
I had an Panerai but sold it again since the comfort in my opinion is not as good af the comfort of Rolex sports watches. I have an SD 16600 and would NEWER sell it for an Panerai.
|
17 September 2012, 07:46 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Balkans
Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller
Posts: 49
|
Not me, I'll keep my 16600 over a PAM...
|
17 September 2012, 07:50 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: Switzerland
Watch: SD/PAM74/ExII/SRSD
Posts: 393
|
go for it... you will most likely returning to Rolex sooner or later :)
__________________
The young do not know enough to be prudent, and therefore they attempt the impossible, and achieve it, generation after generation. Pearl.S.Buck |
17 September 2012, 08:14 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I prefer the SD but the 243 is a classic PAM with a great look.
The 44mm case is definately more bulked up than the SD but can be pretty comfortable on the strap. Go for it if it's calling out to you. If you check out Nishant's recent pics on the Panerai sub forum you will likely be pushed over the edge... |
17 September 2012, 08:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: london
Posts: 5
|
Travis - it's Nishant's post that is pushing me over the edge and since i have a 16610 too I may be about to topple over!
|
17 September 2012, 08:30 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Naya
Location: Kuwait
Watch: Keep it simple
Posts: 122
|
|
17 September 2012, 08:33 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
|
I know I wouldn't. Not for two of them, but thats just me.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist. |
17 September 2012, 08:34 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here and there
Watch: Panerai, Rolex
Posts: 289
|
I like the look of the 243 (and the 24). If you like it, go for it.
|
17 September 2012, 10:06 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
No way....keep the SD!
|
17 September 2012, 10:19 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
I would not do it.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
17 September 2012, 10:45 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 7
|
SD all the way.
|
17 September 2012, 10:50 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 36
|
personal preference but if it was me i'd keep what you've got
|
17 September 2012, 11:06 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I'd keep the SD but that's me.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
17 September 2012, 11:25 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
I'd keep the Dweller
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
18 September 2012, 12:22 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
|
I'd keep the SD - its a classic! Nuf said.
|
18 September 2012, 12:37 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I would keep the SD.
|
18 September 2012, 12:39 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PA
Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail
Posts: 1,054
|
SD! Post the same question in the PAM sub forum and see your results
|
18 September 2012, 12:43 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Erwin
Location: usa
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 685
|
I've almost done it with a different Pam model ( twice ), but ending up keeping the SD instead! Never will I consider again!
|
18 September 2012, 12:43 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: L.I./N.Y.
Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M
Posts: 2,769
|
I wouldnt do it, not a chance.
|
18 September 2012, 01:04 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
I would do it . . . NEVER for a 243 . . .
Just my .02 But for the one pictured underneath . . . . it would be a really hard decision for me . . ! HAGOne and keep us updated ! |
18 September 2012, 01:06 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Coach
Location: Boston
Watch: Rolex Deep Sea
Posts: 1,297
|
I say do it if you like the 243. The Sea Dweller is the better watch, but you already have a Sub. Could be a nice change of pace for you. Good luck!
|
18 September 2012, 02:24 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
Naw, would never trade the SD for the PAM. I thought about it as well, but in the end couldn't let a Rolex(especially a classic like SD) go for a PAM. If you're getting the "itch" for a new watch, add another one, or trade the SD for a different Rolex.
Rolex over PAM any day of the week. |
18 September 2012, 02:29 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
I think you are about to make a big mistake, SD 4000 is much more popular than the Panerai among the diving community
|
18 September 2012, 03:11 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
|
Yikes!! Don't do it. A 2008 Dweller is practically the perfect watch IMO.
While the 243 is one of the few PAM models that I like - it's something about the brand that I just can't fall in love with, or ever trade for a Rolex. It's entirely your choice though. If the 243 "does it" for you, and the SD doesn't, then that might be the choice for you. I think you will regret it 5+ years down the road though. Good luck! |
18 September 2012, 03:12 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
|
oops, dupe post please ignore
|
18 September 2012, 03:29 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 357
|
SD for a PAM? As to me, never.
|
18 September 2012, 04:01 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Justin
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,307
|
I'd keep the Seadweller
|
18 September 2012, 04:12 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
I am a PAM fan...but I would have to go NO deal on this one..
if it was a SUB...maybe not a SD
__________________
too much into watches... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.