ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 November 2007, 09:03 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
|
Magnetic field
I wear a GMT-II but the company I work for makes magnets
After reading about the new Milgauss and it's resistance to magnetic flux, I'm starting to wonder if my GMT is going to do well in this environment and what happens if I ever wear my GMT near any magnetic fields. I've never had any problems wearing a quartz watch in the shop, just how sensitive is my new Rolex and what will happen if I get too close to a magnet?
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
11 November 2007, 09:06 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Thani
Location: Dubai UAE
Watch: Milgauss 116400 GV
Posts: 2,082
|
ONLY the milgauss is anti-magnetic
so my suggestion is to BUY A MILGAUSS !! lool good luck ! |
11 November 2007, 09:16 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Well, all Rolex watches are antimagnetic to an extend.
To get the classification "antimagnetic", a movement must be able to go precisely after having been subjected to a magnetic field of 4,800 A/m (Ampere per meter). There are two ways of making a watch antimagnetic (quoted from Wikipedia): "The first way consists in using different alloys, capable to withstand magnetic fields. Such alloys as Invar (iron - nickel - carbon - chromium alloy), Glucydur (beryllium - bronze alloy), Nivarox (iron - nickel - chromium - titanium - beryllium alloy) and Elinvar - an alloy similar to Invar, though less resistant to magnetism and more resistant to thermal influence. Due to different components these alloys have different properties. They were differently used by various watch-making brands. However, since the 50's Nivarox and Glucydur were extensively used by the watchmakers. Starting with the 60's almost all Swiss watches had Glucydur balance and Nivarox hairsprings. The anchors, escape wheels and other parts of mechanism were also made of non-magnetic metals or alloys. Another way of making a watch non-magnetic is to house the entire movement into a case made of a highly conductive (permeable) material. The movement is covered by an additional soft-iron clasp to prevent the forming of magnetic fields inside the watch itself." I work in an environment (single office) with 14 PC's around me and close by non-stop, and my Rolex watch is still spot on! There is much hysteria about the influence of magnetism on watches. You would almost have to virtually place your watch on top of a big loudspeaker for several hours to have your watch magnetised. BTW: The Milgauss is not the only (super)antimagnetic Rolex that Rolex has made: The Oysterquarz was antimagnetic to 1,000 Oersted (another designation of antimagnetism), and the Milgauss is antimagnetic to 1,000 Tesla (yet another term), but the same as 1,000 Gauss (to use another term again!). Another step in the fight again magnetism is the new Parachrom Bleu hairspring which is inside the Daytona, Milgauss, new GMT II and YM II. That balance is virtually impervious to the influence of magnetism.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
11 November 2007, 12:05 PM | #4 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
Bill don't tell me you make stereo speakers?
It probably will not be a problem, but you might wish to check how your watch goes for time keeping. If it starts going out by more than +10 second per day, then there might be something to start worrying about. |
11 November 2007, 12:40 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
|
Quote:
Luckily, usually when I deal with parts they are in a demagnetized state. BUT I just checked www.time.gov and my watch is only behind about 2 seconds and I last set it on the day we set our clocks back 1 hour for daylight savings time. That seems kind of incredible so I will continue to monitor it.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
|
11 November 2007, 01:53 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
this is only anecdotal, but i have noticed that my watch runs a little slowly after heavy laptop use and my laptop's hard drive is directly under where i rest my wrist.
|
11 November 2007, 06:38 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
mborkow, this could be due to your relatively sedentary posture (as far as wrist movements are concerned) during laptop use. Like dial up overnight on the night stand.
Just a thought. Because I don't think laptop use has much magnetic effect on watches. Just my opinion. |
11 November 2007, 07:06 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
|
11 November 2007, 07:08 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Not necessarily sir. Dial up on my black face EXP II seems to lose time.
Those positions are a rough guide only and quite often, the newer fast beat (28k plus) movements react differently. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.