ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

david_chance · 26 October 2012, 08:11 PM

This is the second time this watch has been auctioned.

Thinking perhaps he didn't know that by 1966 Rolex had no connection with Unicorn I wrote to him and let him know.

Then I noticed this morning he relished the watch without any clarification at all.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/STUNNING-RAR...E:B:SS:US:1123

cajunron · 27 October 2012, 09:23 AM

This seller actually has more than one watch that they have branded as "Rolex" Unicorn watches. Anything they can do to make a sale. SMH.

david_chance · 29 October 2012, 12:27 AM

Would this be considered fraud or deceptive? Or just ambiguous?

26 October 2012, 08:11 PM	#1
david_chance Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: New Jersey Posts: 17	Rolex Unicorn 1966 Auction This is the second time this watch has been auctioned. Thinking perhaps he didn't know that by 1966 Rolex had no connection with Unicorn I wrote to him and let him know. Then I noticed this morning he relished the watch without any clarification at all. http://www.ebay.com/itm/STUNNING-RAR...E:B:SS:US:1123

27 October 2012, 09:23 AM	#2
cajunron 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,872	This seller actually has more than one watch that they have branded as "Rolex" Unicorn watches. Anything they can do to make a sale. SMH. __________________

29 October 2012, 12:27 AM	#3
david_chance Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: New Jersey Posts: 17	Would this be considered fraud or deceptive? Or just ambiguous?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)