ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 October 2012, 02:18 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
|
For all you vintage nuts out there...
Do you only collect vintages or have modern ones in your collection as well?
I'm starting to really love the look and feel of vintage watches as each one has a unique character and personality. I hope to have mostly vintages and a few modern ones that have my name on the card. I'll have to say vintages are much more difficult and stressful buys, but there's no shortage of extremely helpful experts on the forum with a keen eye to minute details. I appreciate you guys! |
30 October 2012, 02:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
The only new one I have is a Bell & Ross. I've had new Rolex watches before, but I sold them and bought old ones! Love vintage. Tried to buy new again, but just can't.
|
30 October 2012, 02:33 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
I owned modern first then I tried vintage and I couldn't go back.
|
30 October 2012, 02:33 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Quote:
Takes time . . . I am learning each day . . And some don't want to go through all the hassle . . . so they buy new . . . But if you love plexi . . . ;-) HAGM |
|
30 October 2012, 02:34 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
I prefer vintage but I still have a Explorer 114270. The only reason it isn't gone is that it was my first Rolex.
|
30 October 2012, 02:35 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
Vintage is like a fine Bordeaux and sometimes it takes TIME to source and takes TIME to slowly appreciate and enjoy! It is forever peaking and forever getting more aromatic and sexier over time!
Modern pieces are nice too but they are easily replaced any day of the week. Good luck and enjoy! Fred |
30 October 2012, 02:37 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
No new here! Am not interested in modern at all.
|
30 October 2012, 02:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Oxford UK
Watch: 5512 from 1960
Posts: 139
|
Vintage Only!
for few reasons: 1- I hate paying big $$$ for anything produced in 'millionS' per year 2- I hate seeing my exact watch on too many wrists... 3- I just dont like any of the new sport models, especially hate ceramics and YM2 4- Personally am 'anti-bubble' 5- I like to polish my own acrylic crystals 6- I love the hunt, the part sourcing, the debates etc , its become a hobby.... |
30 October 2012, 03:17 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
|
Startet with used and new, but Vintage is just so hard to beat for all the good reasons You guys posted already, ...it's an addiction.
|
30 October 2012, 03:32 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
I may be a little different than most, but my daily wear time is primarily spent with an M series ExpII. In order to preserve my vintage watches their wear is reserved for meetings, dinner out and other appropriate social activities........if I do wear a vintage to work it is usually on one of the "open" 6 or 9 days like today..........
|
30 October 2012, 03:53 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
|
I started with a new one - my 16600. Great watch that I have many memories with and will never sell. Then I got a vintage 1665, and if I get another watch, it will be a vintage. No more new models for me. None interest me and none have the appeal of vintage. Vintage is where it is at.
__________________
V/R Mike |
30 October 2012, 04:05 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: joe
Location: Laguna, SoCal
Watch: dd
Posts: 220
|
New watches you go to your AD and buy/order one. Anybody who has the money can also do exactly the same thing.
With vintage, first you must learn almost everything about the particular watch so you know, 1 - you know how to differentiate the good from the bad and 2 - which variant you like. Then the fun looking for one begins. You must have patience. When you find one then learn again about the seller. And the good about it, no two things are exactly alike. |
30 October 2012, 04:35 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
|
I have a mix of vintage and new and enjoy both.
I love the research and attention to detail that goes into vintage. The learning process, the acquired knowledge, the search....... although every now and then I need to buy new just to quench that desire if I'm struggling to find what I want...... My only problem is I'm extremely fussy and this often means that I pass unless they are absolutely perfect......I also generally only buy full packages so again this limits my options...... Another thing I find with vintage vs. new is that whereas I feel, to a certain extent, that I'm spending money when I buy new, with vintage I feel more like I'm diversifying ..... which is clearly more justifiable |
30 October 2012, 04:47 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
I don't presently own a modern but I'm looking at one. When I'm ready, I'll just buy it, not really too much work involved.
|
30 October 2012, 05:22 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I have both vintage and new, but I prefer a plexi crystal. I do dive with my Rolex watches, so I do need a uni-directional bezel and the ability to send off to RSC for a service, new dial, hands, etc. just in case one floods.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
30 October 2012, 06:04 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
|
I love vintage, but I'm entering the "one-watch" phase where I sell all my watches to get one really nice modern piece for reliability and daily wear. After this phase I'll be back into vintage, no doubt. I do plan to keep a 1978 TT DJ on my winder.
|
30 October 2012, 09:52 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Hello Paltak, I, like you, like them all and while most of my Rolex collection are vintage, I have a few newer models too. I also have a couple of the old Tudor chronographs that fit in well with everything else. Good luck with your collection.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
30 October 2012, 10:37 AM | #18 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
I go for the vintage Rolex, durable movements + classic luxury look which never go old... U heard the saying: "Old things are becoming new again" My 1570 movements is still running wild like a young mustang in the Rolex's wolf pack! Outlast all of them, Newest one = Movado =D |
|
30 October 2012, 11:04 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
|
Thanks for everyone's feedback. In my short love affair with vintages, I share many of the same sentiments many of you have echoed. The journey truly is the destination with vintages and I'm loving it.
|
30 October 2012, 11:25 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 86
|
u should check the "favorite vintage movement" thread; we posting our movements over there
|
30 October 2012, 11:35 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
|
|
30 October 2012, 02:01 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 6
|
|
30 October 2012, 02:06 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
|
|
30 October 2012, 02:11 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
|
Both For Me
The 1655 is the only Rolex reference that mattered and still sings very loudly to me... Other's references along the way were just fillers...
I loved the Rolex tribute to the 1655 with the 216570 so I picked that one up as well!
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.