The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 October 2012, 04:30 AM   #1
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Accuracy question from a first time Rolex owner (GMT II C brand new)

Yes finally gotten myself a brand new GMT II C :-D
Very happy with the look and feel and happy to finally being a Rolex owner after a long series of radio controlled g-shocks…

One question to the experts from a newcomer on mechanical movements.
I register that the accuracy of the watch varies quite a lot through the day. In high activity periods with for example running and other exercise the watch can gain as much 15 - 20 seconds in in 2 – 3 hours period. In quiet periods for example during sleep at night (have the watch on 24/7) it slows down maybe 15 seconds trough the night.

Is this normal behavior to have such big differences in accuracy depending on activity level?

I understand that it is a very complicated mechanical instrument (and that a radio controlled G-shock will always will have a upper hand with regards to accuracy… :-D) but seeing watch reviews where they measure differences accuracy in various positions of the watch my variations seems large?

On an average 24 hour period the watch gain anywhere between 0-5 to 20 – 25 seconds dependent on activity level (this based on a 8 days of use).
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 04:41 AM   #2
dardeca
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,477
That is not normal.
dardeca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 04:45 AM   #3
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
What is normal and within COSC stds is minus four to plus six seconds per day. Give it a week ir two and then average it over a week minimum and then see.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 04:56 AM   #4
Lagunatic
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Ron
Location: Laguna Niguel, Ca
Watch: Rolex 116613LN
Posts: 1,724
you got a lemon. mine is -3 seconds every 24 hours.
Lagunatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 05:01 AM   #5
Watchmutt
"TRF" Member
 
Watchmutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 724
Are you comparing it to a consistent source?
Watchmutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 05:03 AM   #6
Kyu
"TRF" Member
 
Kyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: yes.. it's Kyu
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116759SANR
Posts: 1,499
Congrats !

As for the accuracy u should give it a week
20sec diff is not normal lol but check the min diff also
Kyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 05:30 AM   #7
gregdolley
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Greg Dolley
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rose Gold Daytona
Posts: 1,283
Wow. No that's not normal. My first two Rolexes (a DJ and a DD) were +5 sec/day. My current watch (a new Daytona) is almost spot on, gaining only 14 seconds over 49 days! And that's with the chrono running sometimes - I've noticed it gains more time when the chrono is active; if it's off all the time, the watch seems to gain only about 1/8th of a second per day.

The variations in the accuracy of your watch is what concerns me. It should be consistent throughout the day no matter what you're doing. It may not be as accurate as a quartz movement, but it still should not have such wide variations that you describe. +6 sec/day is the max for a COSC certified watch.

I would definitely have it looked at...
gregdolley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 05:31 AM   #8
mmmk604
"TRF" Member
 
mmmk604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
I get about +4s...
mmmk604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 06:14 AM   #9
How
"TRF" Member
 
How's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
My SubC +1s per day.
How is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 06:16 AM   #10
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Use time.gov as a reference and you can't go wrong. (I see you're in Norway, so I linked to the UTC mode.) Even radio-controlled clocks and watches can be way off in just a matter of hours because some manufacturers put the cheapest movement they can in a clock that's designed to update with an atomic clock every four hours.

I have a Sharp that's like that. It will get you to work on time, but forget it as a reference.

I have never experienced your situation with my Rolex watches, but mine have consistently gained time over the first year at which time I have them regulated and then they pretty much stay within COSC (-4/+6 sec./day), except for my DJ, which I dropped.

Check the watch about every 24 hours and give it at least 5 days before you make a judgement.

A regulation can be done in short order and under warranty for the first two years, so don't lose any sleep over it.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 06:19 AM   #11
Ck8
"TRF" Member
 
Ck8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Mark 哥
Location: UK
Posts: 860
Consistancy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kallagtunet View Post
Yes finally gotten myself a brand new GMT II C :-D
Very happy with the look and feel and happy to finally being a Rolex owner after a long series of radio controlled g-shocks…

One question to the experts from a newcomer on mechanical movements.
I register that the accuracy of the watch varies quite a lot through the day. In high activity periods with for example running and other exercise the watch can gain as much 15 - 20 seconds in in 2 – 3 hours period. In quiet periods for example during sleep at night (have the watch on 24/7) it slows down maybe 15 seconds trough the night.

Is this normal behavior to have such big differences in accuracy depending on activity level?

I understand that it is a very complicated mechanical instrument (and that a radio controlled G-shock will always will have a upper hand with regards to accuracy… :-D) but seeing watch reviews where they measure differences accuracy in various positions of the watch my variations seems large?

On an average 24 hour period the watch gain anywhere between 0-5 to 20 – 25 seconds dependent on activity level (this based on a 8 days of use).
If you let it run in the breaking in period, keep a record of the gains or loses with your normal wear then you can send it back to RSC to regulate it. As long as your watch has a consistant amount either gains or loses then the RSC can do the adjustment. I have had all my Rolex regulated in the past and I can truly say they have been spot on day in day out.
__________________
I like wonton noodles soup - Mark 哥
Ck8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 06:52 AM   #12
James M
"TRF" Member
 
James M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16610
Posts: 158
Mines +6 at the moment, was higher then I changed to the crown up resting position.
James M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 06:55 AM   #13
caryyee
"TRF" Member
 
caryyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
If it's brand new, give it a week or so to bed in, and then check it again. But yes, that much of a diff in a 2-3 block seems unusual. Mine is consistent +2 secs a day (not sure what the variation is during high activity periods (I teach and also participate in group fitness classes daily)), but in any given 24hr period, it's +2 secs.
caryyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 08:15 AM   #14
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Thanks for the responses. The ting that worries me is the variance dependent on activity level I can not see how that can be handled through a general adjustment for speed. I will let it settle in one more week. I have used the clock at my PC at home and work as reference. Will use the link provided above to take the potential source variations away.
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 08:19 AM   #15
Grissom
"TRF" Member
 
Grissom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kallagtunet View Post
Thanks for the responses. The ting that worries me is the variance dependent on activity level I can not see how that can be handled through a general adjustment for speed. I will let it settle in one more week. I have used the clock at my PC at home and work as reference. Will use the link provided above to take the potential source variations away.
I have never experienced that......none of my watches have shown that their accuracy is dependent on my personal activity level. I would recommend that you have it looked at.
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976)
116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) +
116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil)

Who else needs an Intervention?
(109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5

RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend
Grissom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 08:22 AM   #16
Brenngun
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Brenngun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,866
Dumb question but gotta ask. Did you wind it a full 40 revolutiions of the crown? OK having said that ...... break in period or not it's accuracy should not be affected by a specific activity other than complete stillness.
Brenngun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2012, 08:33 AM   #17
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenngun View Post
Dumb question but gotta ask. Did you wind it a full 40 revolutiions of the crown? OK having said that ...... break in period or not it's accuracy should not be affected by a specific activity other than complete stillness.
I have not. But the AD said that they did while at the same time they adjusted the bracelet. I have done now to be on the sure side and I have will use only the time.gov for futher checks to be sure.. I will keep you posted and hope that it is not a lemon on my arm (it looks goood thoug...)...
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 06:59 AM   #18
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Have now been excluding potential other explanations? Have winded it full 40 + have timed in only using time.gov and still the same. Regular office level activates it gains 6-8 seconds per day. A training session of 45 minutes of running (not very fast I'm not that fit) it gains 7 - 8 seconds in the short time of exercise where the watch is in more movement.

I.E it seems like I have (very a good looking) lemon on my arm…

Anyone that knows mechanical movements that can explain how this can happen? And what can be done to it?

I will take it to the AD next week, but do not look forward to be parted with my watch for a repair after being a first time in my life Rolex owner for less than 2 weeks! I would ideally want a new one or at least a loaner while it is at repair. What can I expect?
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 07:11 AM   #19
globalmedia33
"TRF" Member
 
globalmedia33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Thien
Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 2,754
My Sub C gain 2sec. in a month.
__________________
Sub. 5513
116710LN
116610LV
“I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
globalmedia33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 07:34 AM   #20
James M
"TRF" Member
 
James M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16610
Posts: 158
+2 a month???
James M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 07:52 AM   #21
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by globalmedia33 View Post
My Sub C gain 2sec. in a month.
You are not helping a lot here
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 07:59 AM   #22
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
-4/+6 is the norm. Outside of those parameters......it's not normal.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 08:06 AM   #23
Kallagtunet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by nauticajoe View Post
-4/+6 is the norm. Outside of those parameters......it's not normal.
Yes understanding that. Anyone have an explanation on why 45 min of running can increasé the gain rate so sigificantly? Gaining 8 sec in such short time adding seems strange. There must be an mechaical explanation to the large variance of accuracy dependent on the activity level?
Kallagtunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 08:09 AM   #24
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Not sure.

You may want to lay it on its side tonight. It should lose a few secs.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 01:38 PM   #25
Brenngun
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Brenngun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kallagtunet View Post
Yes understanding that. Anyone have an explanation on why 45 min of running can increasé the gain rate so sigificantly? Gaining 8 sec in such short time adding seems strange. There must be an mechaical explanation to the large variance of accuracy dependent on the activity level?
Really have no idea why this would happen. Frankly I wouldn't spend any more time trying to figure out why nust know it's not normal. Take it back to your AD to get it fixed. It's not like your going to open it up yourself to try and fix it ..... right ....
Brenngun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 05:33 PM   #26
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
It's not normal, take it back under warranty
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 05:57 PM   #27
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by James M View Post
+2 a month???

My Exp II 216570 (3187 movement) averaged at -6 /month

If I had consistently rested it dial up at night I expect it would have been dead on
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 06:24 PM   #28
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
This is a puzzle and I would re-evaluate your time check methods.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 07:01 PM   #29
Lrd2sea
"TRF" Member
 
Lrd2sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: everywhere
Posts: 252
That does not sound right. I bought my gmt2 c brand new, and it was maybe off 7 sec. at most, per 24hr, the first few weeks.
After 5 months, it is now -1 or less in 72 hr, since the last time I sync it.
Lrd2sea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2012, 08:08 PM   #30
James M
"TRF" Member
 
James M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16610
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
My Exp II 216570 (3187 movement) averaged at -6 /month

If I had consistently rested it dial up at night I expect it would have been dead on
That's great, wish mine was that accurate.

As it is its just falling within COSC so as long as it stays that way I'm happy.
James M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.