ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AL7273 · 3 November 2012, 01:18 AM

Hi Guys,

I went to the local Rolex AD and I was shocked (shocked i tell you) to see how large the new Explorer IIs are. I have small wrists and can't really pull off wearing one of them. It's the same with the new GMTs as well.

I am in the market for a new watch and was planning on buying one through Sediqqi here in Dubai but the new models are HUGE...or is it just me?

Psmith · 3 November 2012, 01:23 AM

The GMT and Sub are still 40 mm

Perhaps you need a little time to get used to the different look? (although the GMT II C was launched back in 2007)

The bracelets and clasps now feel more substantial and have a different feel on the wrist compared to the old models

The Exp II is now 42 mm, but I find it sits flat on the wrist and the case is quite curved in profile, making it comfortable for me at least

kilyung · 3 November 2012, 01:49 AM

How about the new 39mm Explorer?

R_Ongjoco · 3 November 2012, 01:53 AM

OT, but I'm glad that there are still folks who think wearing something over 42mm is too big. I've seen numerous posts from people on other fora that they wouldnt wear anything under 44mm.

I still think that the sweet spot is 40-42mm. Of course this is just my opinion :)

/off-topic post

AH0RSEY · 3 November 2012, 02:16 AM

my suggestion is eat more spinach - aka Popeye - it did his wrist the world of good ;o)

if that doesn't work, yeah you can always find the Previous Explorer 2 - 16570 @ 40mm might suit you better....smaller than that, try a DJ ( BUT DONT TRY DJII cos they are 41mm )

floater156 · 3 November 2012, 02:50 AM

I'm going to have to agree with you about the new 42mm ExpII. I'm 6'6" 245 lbs and it's too big for me.

MalcolmSquare · 3 November 2012, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AH0RSEY

you can always find the Previous Explorer 2 - 16570 @ 40mm might suit you better

x2. The 16570 looks and feels great in person.

Annan · 3 November 2012, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MalcolmSquare

x2. The 16570 looks and feels great in person.

Agree. I tried on the new model and thought it looked too big but am quite pleased with my new (to me) 16570.

Ardalan · 3 November 2012, 09:49 AM

Submariner

superdog · 3 November 2012, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Annan

Agree. I tried on the new model and thought it looked too big but am quite pleased with my new (to me) 16570.

That watch was made for you. It's literally perfect for your wrist.

strafer_kid · 8 November 2012, 11:45 PM

The new Explorer 42mm may appear a bit big at the outset - I thought this myself just before I picked one up - it felt bigger than my 1680 sub (and is) but it is a more modern and more robustly constructed watch that you could take more or less anywhere without too much worry of damage etc - its design and construction clearly depict that - anyway dont let any initial impression put you off - definitely think you should take another look!

3 November 2012, 01:18 AM	#1
AL7273 Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: UAE Posts: 195	Explorer II Hi Guys, I went to the local Rolex AD and I was shocked (shocked i tell you) to see how large the new Explorer IIs are. I have small wrists and can't really pull off wearing one of them. It's the same with the new GMTs as well. I am in the market for a new watch and was planning on buying one through Sediqqi here in Dubai but the new models are HUGE...or is it just me?

3 November 2012, 01:23 AM	#2
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	The GMT and Sub are still 40 mm Perhaps you need a little time to get used to the different look? (although the GMT II C was launched back in 2007) The bracelets and clasps now feel more substantial and have a different feel on the wrist compared to the old models The Exp II is now 42 mm, but I find it sits flat on the wrist and the case is quite curved in profile, making it comfortable for me at least __________________

3 November 2012, 02:16 AM	#5
AH0RSEY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Harrogate Watch: OUT !!!! Posts: 829	my suggestion is eat more spinach - aka Popeye - it did his wrist the world of good ;o) if that doesn't work, yeah you can always find the Previous Explorer 2 - 16570 @ 40mm might suit you better....smaller than that, try a DJ ( BUT DONT TRY DJII cos they are 41mm ) __________________ Current rotation; AP15500ST grey, White Daytona 116500, WG Black/Red Daytona 116509, White and Black EXP 42, GMT2C.... too many previous it makes my head hurt thinking about them.

3 November 2012, 02:50 AM	#6
floater156 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Chris Location: Wisconsin Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,984	I'm going to have to agree with you about the new 42mm ExpII. I'm 6'6" 245 lbs and it's too big for me. __________________ Lead by example through production.

3 November 2012, 09:49 AM	#9
Ardalan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 482	Submariner __________________ My Collection: -Rolex White SS Daytona -Rolex Submariner no-date -Omega Speedmaster Moon Watch -Omega Seamaster Professional

3 November 2012, 01:49 AM	#3
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	How about the new 39mm Explorer?

3 November 2012, 01:53 AM	#4
R_Ongjoco "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ron Location: BayArea/SanDiego Watch: AP Posts: 427	OT, but I'm glad that there are still folks who think wearing something over 42mm is too big. I've seen numerous posts from people on other fora that they wouldnt wear anything under 44mm. I still think that the sweet spot is 40-42mm. Of course this is just my opinion :) /off-topic post

8 November 2012, 11:45 PM	#11
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	The new Explorer 42mm may appear a bit big at the outset - I thought this myself just before I picked one up - it felt bigger than my 1680 sub (and is) but it is a more modern and more robustly constructed watch that you could take more or less anywhere without too much worry of damage etc - its design and construction clearly depict that - anyway dont let any initial impression put you off - definitely think you should take another look!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)